From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 27 08:14:58 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2013 13:14:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52879 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAgqX-0004G7-RT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:14:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48499) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAgqW-0004G1-AF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:14:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAgoi-0001i4-Lr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:13:05 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:42068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAgoi-0001hn-JF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:13:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAgoh-0006Vq-Is for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:13:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAgoc-0001eg-Kn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:13:03 -0500 Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:38554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAgd1-0006GA-4S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:00:59 -0500 Received: by mail-da0-f46.google.com with SMTP id z8so291311dad.19 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:00:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:organization:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OQumrJiJ5lK8OnJVrKQRIoM/DBwMTSzIhv9Ls0rReh0=; b=NyoVcSKPA/rXA2kdNnt2jXlsOyATvSo7wwkfpxbgZObX3psPpWvGlL5vKv2id51huJ MAxFgr3AzOsh6wkrzs+x3bCMS74crzgIXG2e6wLYzIhVtzXA7MruWfkWfQMyn63tWuhH isES3IQ+0zlXM735EmBcIgAZKAmMpI/yjBuVkIwMci5RJaqTR6i92Ml/ucd++UVpE7A6 S4it9pAaOHVLpnAtpZpBkLiYXfz/EKfuRl3dZyKRAZM+d1G/TSHXxVe4Z8DXQNRw5f29 FBoRn0uleV6YXp7xhKMPSF07H0htW3KgaoqX2iby/aOwixO5jZ7WZWGDz7N5d4/OuMMD wJsA== X-Received: by 10.66.19.229 with SMTP id i5mr7226527pae.220.1361970058165; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:00:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from Emacs ([123.114.129.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t6sm5316165paz.11.2013.02.27.05.00.53 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:00:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:00:50 +0800 From: Xue Fuqiao To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: [wishlist] About `--enable-link-time-optimization' Message-Id: <20130227210050.45842431c3333e9829ce5aa2@gmail.com> Organization: The Church of Emacs X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) Can `--enable-link-time-optimization' be the default if there is GCC (>= 4.5.0) on the host? -- Best regards, Xue Fuqiao. http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 04 02:30:49 2013 Received: (at 13834) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2013 07:30:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58077 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCPrD-00027L-S6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 02:30:48 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:50521 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCPrA-00027C-V1 for 13834@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 02:30:45 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCPqv-0000m2-Lz; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 02:30:30 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: Xue Fuqiao Subject: Re: bug#13834: [wishlist] About `--enable-link-time-optimization' References: <20130227210050.45842431c3333e9829ce5aa2@gmail.com> X-Spook: 64 Vauxhall Cross 9/11 Aldergrove global illuminati BATF X-Ran: &DqORx}}/Rax6\!k}$pP>QbS+h_fq!\x|KP2G+4zd*F;4+)K"sr@iC);#36`j;ox]Csj.[ X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 02:30:29 -0500 Message-ID: <5dtxorbp0q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13834 Cc: 13834@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) Xue Fuqiao wrote: > Can `--enable-link-time-optimization' be the default if there is GCC > (>= 4.5.0) on the host? Why? What measurable benefit have you found it to give? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 01 02:20:08 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2014 07:20:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43689 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9Us2-00023T-Jn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 02:20:07 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:50816) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9Urx-00022o-VY for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 02:20:02 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1W9Urk-0001tb-Gx for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 08:19:49 +0100 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:18:57 -0800 Message-Id: <87txcjpafy.fsf@building.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #13834 X-MailScanner-ID: 1W9Urk-0001tb-Gx X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1391843989.08273@fJGKhx4Fw2b9yO11Wz3kEQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) close 13834 From unknown Sat Aug 09 01:08:39 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator