GNU bug report logs - #13810
24.3.50; Docstring of `newline' is confusing

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Xue Fuqiao <xfq.free <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:06:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed

Found in version 24.3.50

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Xue Fuqiao <xfq.free <at> gmail.com>
To: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
Cc: 13810 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#13810: 24.3.50; Docstring of `newline' is confusing
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:35:22 +0800
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:18:59 +0100
Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net> wrote:
> >> > In the doc string of the function `newline':
> >> >   Insert a newline, and move to left margin of the new line if it's
> >> >   blank.
> >> > To reproduce this bug:
> >> >    emacs -Q
> >> >    M-<
> >> >    M-: (newline) RET
> >> > A new line appears, but the point doesn't move to left margin of the
> >> > first line.  
> >> I think you misread the doc string: point should -- and does -- move to
> >> the left margin of the *new* line.
> > You mean the *new* line is the second line (now)?
> In the doc string the two
> words "new line" unambiguously refer to the line after the inserted
> newline character that results from calling newline, but the first word
> "newline" should perhaps be replaced by "newline character" or "line
> feed".

Sounds fine for me.

> Steve Berman

-- 
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 246 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.