GNU bug report logs - #13764
24.3.50; please do not use defsubst for `font-lock-(apply-highlight|fontify-anchored-keywords)'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:36:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: wontfix

Found in version 24.3.50

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 13764 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#13764: 24.3.50; please do not use defsubst for `font-lock-(apply-highlight|fontify-anchored-keywords)'
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
> > These are not tiny, trivial functions.
> >
> > They do not fit the criteria for `defsubst' outlined in (elisp)
> > `Inline Functions'.  And they introduce all of the disadvantages
> > listed there, especially this one, listed first:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > I see no reason why these function should not be defuns.
> 
> Presumably they are that way because of efficiency concerns.  Have you
> done benchmarking to compare the impact of these defsubsts turning into
> defuns?

Oh come on.  Why such a presumption?  Did you look at the code?

Read what you quoted above.  These do not fit the clearly
documented criteria for `defsubst'.

Do you see a reason why these should be `defsubsts'?
Have you done benchmarking to support such a supposition?

As they don't fit the Emacs criteria, and there is no code
comment that calls out why they - exceptionally - should be
defsubsts in spite of not fulfilling the criteria, a priori
they should not be defsubsts.  The burden of proof lies
with a claim that they - exceptionally - should be.

Not to mention that there is less and less need for using
defsubst.




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 263 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.