GNU bug report logs - #13707
24.3.50; (elisp) Pattern matching case statement: UPattern `(let UPAT EXP)' missing

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de

Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:34:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed, wontfix

Found in version 24.3.50

Fixed in version 25.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 13707 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 13707 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13707; Package emacs. (Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:34:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to michael_heerdegen <at> web.de:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:34:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.3.50;
	(elisp) Pattern matching case statement: UPattern `(let UPAT EXP)'
	missing
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:33:54 +0100
Hi,

in the elisp manual, node "Pattern matching case statement", in the
listing of possible UPattern forms at the end, the

  (let UPAT EXP)

form is missing.


Thanks,

Michael.



In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2)
 of 2013-02-07 on dex, modified by Debian
 (emacs-snapshot package, version 2:20130207-1)
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10707000
System Description:	Debian GNU/Linux 7.0 (wheezy)





Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13707; Package emacs. (Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:11:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 13707 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
Cc: 13707 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13707: 24.3.50;
	(elisp) Pattern matching case statement: UPattern `(let UPAT EXP)'
	missing
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:10:02 -0500
> in the elisp manual, node "Pattern matching case statement", in the
> listing of possible UPattern forms at the end, the

>   (let UPAT EXP)

> form is missing.

Yes, some of the more obscure forms are not in the Elisp manual, because
I'm not completely sure they're good enough to be advertised so loudly.


        Stefan




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13707; Package emacs. (Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:44:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 13707 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
Cc: 13707 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13707: 24.3.50;
	(elisp) Pattern matching case statement: UPattern `(let UPAT EXP)'
	missing
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:44:16 +0100
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:

> > in the elisp manual, node "Pattern matching case statement", in the
> > listing of possible UPattern forms at the end, the
>
> >   (let UPAT EXP)
>
> > form is missing.
>
> Yes, some of the more obscure forms are not in the Elisp manual, because
> I'm not completely sure they're good enough to be advertised so loudly.

Good.  I'll try to use and test it where possible.

So, leave this report open as a reminder, or close.


Thanks,

Michael.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13707; Package emacs. (Fri, 04 Mar 2016 15:35:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 13707 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>, 13707 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13707: 24.3.50;
 (elisp) Pattern matching case statement: UPattern `(let UPAT EXP)'
 missing
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 14:12:22 +0000
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de> writes:

> Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:
>
>> > in the elisp manual, node "Pattern matching case statement", in the
>> > listing of possible UPattern forms at the end, the
>>
>> >   (let UPAT EXP)
>>
>> > form is missing.
>>
>> Yes, some of the more obscure forms are not in the Elisp manual, because
>> I'm not completely sure they're good enough to be advertised so loudly.
>
> Good.  I'll try to use and test it where possible.
>
> So, leave this report open as a reminder, or close.

I think Eli fixed this documentation problem, so I'm now closing.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




Added tag(s) fixed. Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 04 Mar 2016 15:35:17 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug marked as fixed in version 25.1, send any further explanations to 13707 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and michael_heerdegen <at> web.de Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 04 Mar 2016 15:35:17 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 02 Apr 2016 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 9 years and 81 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.