From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 09 18:36:11 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2013 23:36:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47404 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4Jxr-0003vT-JZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:36:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4Jxp-0003vL-Bx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:36:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4Jxb-0006xV-7H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:35:57 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:57169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4Jxb-0006xQ-4F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:35:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4JxY-00016P-FL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:35:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4JxV-0006wC-Lu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:35:52 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4JxV-0006w0-79 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:35:49 -0500 Received: from adsl-68-77-17-140.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net ([68.77.17.140]:47524 helo=regnitz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4JxU-0004zb-9b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:35:48 -0500 Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 17:35:46 -0600 Message-Id: <87fw153vsd.fsf@gnu.org> From: "Roland Winkler" To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.2.93; strike-through in org mode X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) visit the following org file with emacs -Q cat > foo.org <) id 1U4OU0-0003MO-Cq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:25:42 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:43306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4OTw-0003ME-4m for 13668@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:25:38 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hm6so2099610wib.14 for <13668@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:25:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=dyPVUfcURvoPsI2swqMEQ7Owpx2vQY90TZcvsCIWD68=; b=rWBByE6QLeS3MaI78J0BSKYCBrbo6Ulj9xkXpQPzFl+fXeWCsfuZRBMywMNs7ouLEA ioFwYMQSTZme3yK0Hcx2QK2wRphorL/owktKb4jHjlBvDFVtbF9dWxH3MkL+RoVVLJq/ MNbq3cbqHwNBvFci57bu/9KK1/VbbCCfvFrlzyzpWb/ePibeFR1bYGfaZZuViHoGGUcb 2rP3WpRx1U5gm9KJERZRZMxY58wV0+OSDv+P6jg/jFi7JivTCFhghyIpmGS8/OIvThhO uef5kPqne+0uhzLQoWGGhQnK9Z0opfT+tCelhExFW6kBLRqGU2VhhTaiKpTvVB1zHmkX xPNw== X-Received: by 10.180.97.166 with SMTP id eb6mr9527239wib.20.1360470322899; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:25:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fx5sm24636370wib.11.2013.02.09.20.25.19 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:25:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F06D91C214F4; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:25:20 +0100 (CET) From: Bastien To: "Roland Winkler" Subject: Re: bug#13668: 24.2.93; strike-through in org mode In-Reply-To: <87fw153vsd.fsf@gnu.org> (Roland Winkler's message of "Sat, 09 Feb 2013 17:35:46 -0600") References: <87fw153vsd.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:25:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87halkn6bz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13668 Cc: 13668@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Hi Roland, "Roland Winkler" writes: > visit the following org file with emacs -Q > > cat > foo.org < * foo > bar (+.2 to .5) > baz (+.2 to .5) > > bar (+.2 to .5) > baz +.2 to .5) > EOF > > Why are part of the second and third line striked through? Because "+" tries to add fontification. > According to the org info pages there is some regexp-based feature > of that kind. Yes, see `org-emphasis-regexp-components'. > But it appears to me that this feature could use a > more sophisticated regexp matcher. Note that the 5th and 6th line > are not striked through. Because the space isn't allowed within +...+ fontified constructs. > Also, as an occassional org mode user without a need for very fancy > things, I am wondering whether I can simply switch off such > structural markup elements. (setq org-fontify-emphasized-text nil) > The org info node on structural markup > elements does not mention such a possibility. Mhh.. yes, I'll perhaps update the manual, or just add a Worg FAQ for this. > I would prefer if, as a > general strategy, the default values for such features were less > aggressive. We try to not make them agressive. But the text you quoted above looks like an example that could be in fixed-with block like this : : bar (+.2 to .5) : baz (+.2 to .5) : bar (+.2 to .5) : baz +.2 to .5) or in another block where *...* constructs are not fontified. Thanks, -- Bastien From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 10 08:01:05 2013 Received: (at 13668) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2013 13:01:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48317 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4WWm-0001Uf-Vd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:01:05 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:55625) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4WWk-0001UY-Lw for 13668@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:01:03 -0500 Received: from adsl-68-77-17-140.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net ([68.77.17.140]:47869 helo=regnitz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4WWT-0004H2-9f; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:00:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20759.39415.151607.366601@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 07:00:39 -0600 From: "Roland Winkler" To: Bastien Subject: Re: bug#13668: 24.2.93; strike-through in org mode In-Reply-To: <87halkn6bz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87fw153vsd.fsf@gnu.org> <87halkn6bz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> X-Mailer: VM 8.2 trial under 24.2.93.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13668 Cc: 13668@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) On Sun Feb 10 2013 Bastien wrote: > > But it appears to me that this feature could use a > > more sophisticated regexp matcher. Note that the 5th and 6th line > > are not striked through. > > Because the space isn't allowed within +...+ fontified constructs. There are spaces both between the 2nd and 3rd line, and between the 5th and 6th line. -- Possibly, the regexp matcher could distinguish in a smarter way between word constituents and no word constituents. > (setq org-fontify-emphasized-text nil) Thanks, I'll use that. > > The org info node on structural markup > > elements does not mention such a possibility. > > Mhh.. yes, I'll perhaps update the manual, or just add a Worg > FAQ for this. Why put this in a separate FAQ? Aren't the info pages the first source of information for such things? Roland From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 10 11:27:59 2013 Received: (at 13668) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2013 16:27:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49215 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4Zl0-0006aj-6U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:27:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:57521) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4Zkx-0006ab-Sg for 13668@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:27:57 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 8so4067562wgl.18 for <13668@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:27:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=MPmJUkmCyZv5k8YoaaloINDZO1jyNHolx6wEwsEnijc=; b=Y8/ZcK730SgK17CQV8SiviavFSiB/XOb2tCCIfPzKDLSOLTYkessLX83nZh2nR4hag L2i+VSY5vqkdg1UrP3UThzOBaG8yKXqBCJIt78Obd5IPfpgMhwzYNMg5LMyHT+2uRjcd sloUqZKupW1gZLfy/YdLELIJ3Vqe0lDTG8cd0Y+90HM379w7lLq4ZobN1AbpfmgFvFHN 9hQjPV9x+qi6lAhO2RYUP3ADSH+PocRQ+hMqZ6U2Tti+gbs8V2ZZImbav6ghPU91WLtF YHy7uZkRp4wK62CZ64OYd+WJRA088Rdxic57aXf2ckRiwon5gEUrXFxiIBjAILmr3eNI iZ5A== X-Received: by 10.194.104.137 with SMTP id ge9mr19221698wjb.59.1360513659974; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:27:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm27612034wiz.1.2013.02.10.08.27.37 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:27:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6B98D1C214F4; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:27:38 +0100 (CET) From: Bastien To: "Roland Winkler" Subject: Re: bug#13668: 24.2.93; strike-through in org mode In-Reply-To: <20759.39415.151607.366601@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Roland Winkler's message of "Sun, 10 Feb 2013 07:00:39 -0600") References: <87fw153vsd.fsf@gnu.org> <87halkn6bz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20759.39415.151607.366601@gargle.gargle.HOWL> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:27:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87zjzc2kxx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13668 Cc: 13668@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Hi Roland, "Roland Winkler" writes: > There are spaces both between the 2nd and 3rd line, and between the > 5th and 6th line. -- Possibly, the regexp matcher could distinguish > in a smarter way between word constituents and no word constituents. Sorry I wasn't clear: by default, space is not allowed after the first "*" and before the second "*". But yes, `org-emphasis-regexp-components' is perhaps too complex and we have been thinking of implementing this another way. Stay tuned. >> (setq org-fontify-emphasized-text nil) > > Thanks, I'll use that. > >> > The org info node on structural markup >> > elements does not mention such a possibility. >> >> Mhh.. yes, I'll perhaps update the manual, or just add a Worg >> FAQ for this. > > Why put this in a separate FAQ? Aren't the info pages the first > source of information for such things? Depends. We try to keep the info manual readable, and it's already quite long. If you can find a good place in the manual, please send a patch. Thanks, -- Bastien From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 10 12:08:28 2013 Received: (at 13668) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2013 17:08:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49244 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4aOB-0007Y7-T8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:08:28 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:59400) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4aO9-0007Y0-RA for 13668@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:08:26 -0500 Received: from adsl-68-77-17-140.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net ([68.77.17.140]:47950 helo=regnitz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4aNq-0007zM-I2; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:08:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20759.54259.751629.173184@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:08:03 -0600 From: "Roland Winkler" To: Bastien Subject: Re: bug#13668: 24.2.93; strike-through in org mode In-Reply-To: <87zjzc2kxx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87fw153vsd.fsf@gnu.org> <87halkn6bz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20759.39415.151607.366601@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87zjzc2kxx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> X-Mailer: VM 8.2 trial under 24.2.93.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13668 Cc: 13668@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) On Sun Feb 10 2013 Bastien wrote: > > Why put this in a separate FAQ? Aren't the info pages the first > > source of information for such things? > > Depends. We try to keep the info manual readable, and it's already > quite long. If you can find a good place in the manual, please send > a patch. I do not find the info nodes on "Structural markup elements" particularly overloaded. The node "Emphasis and monospace" is just one short paragraph, and org-fontify-emphasized-text could esily be mentioned there -- unless this variable also affects other things, so that it should be mentioned higher up in the node hierarchy. If such things get distributed among different places, an info manual plus a separate FAQ, they get yet more confusing, in particular for casual users of org mode. Many users will not even know (or expect) that the info manual does not give them the full story, but they need to consult other sources, too. Take the elisp manual: it's pretty big. But I like it because its authors are pretty good in making it an *efficient* and *reliable* source of information. (Here I'd like to put these words in bold, because I really appreciate this!) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 10 12:12:41 2013 Received: (at 13668) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2013 17:12:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49248 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4aSG-0007e9-V8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:12:41 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com ([74.125.82.176]:41031) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4aSD-0007e1-Rm for 13668@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:12:38 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id s43so4163693wey.7 for <13668@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:12:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=BrxvuZmLe++GmwM+FxTGUV8n1TBgaDy3T6oEdHh6vpc=; b=Iw/H9+4mHA6X0uGtuNj2mMi7QWtpXAsOhrBXevySeWWeYJGbU9jlXyVj9FzCUGbB2b 89oB3b6oxH8jt98Q6ZerS06sTA/wv8Cgw2JWoss3WHun0Pq0Qq1RZrQj322laqGzAPww fqcb5NVD7QjxiLPgrK4ayxb3VTPpHpNb9+twWk8wG7QT05wvcU+4t+DqKBaYhtYMaZx8 XR9sJMWrSC2XEuT6LZ5UIScojtnV9sB7bpqypbTEdZhw+IzwrVhE9NulItgHFKYzIWB1 p4xoHNR1oOnGZxxKPW8yCxaaWIq56oTB+ycPa+UNHkVcBkNrbA7K4Kym5wLNhKV8Oj69 XGKw== X-Received: by 10.194.89.167 with SMTP id bp7mr19381620wjb.0.1360516341722; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:12:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n2sm25620152wiy.6.2013.02.10.09.12.20 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:12:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3C3251C214F4; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:12:20 +0100 (CET) From: Bastien To: "Roland Winkler" Subject: Re: bug#13668: 24.2.93; strike-through in org mode In-Reply-To: <20759.54259.751629.173184__25253.7636356012$1360516174$gmane$org@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Roland Winkler's message of "Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:08:03 -0600") References: <87fw153vsd.fsf@gnu.org> <87halkn6bz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20759.39415.151607.366601@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87zjzc2kxx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20759.54259.751629.173184__25253.7636356012$1360516174$gmane$org@gargle.gargle.HOWL> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:12:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2w82ivf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13668 Cc: 13668@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) "Roland Winkler" writes: > I do not find the info nodes on "Structural markup elements" > particularly overloaded. The node "Emphasis and monospace" is just > one short paragraph, and org-fontify-emphasized-text could esily be > mentioned there -- unless this variable also affects other things, > so that it should be mentioned higher up in the node hierarchy. Please provide a patch. -- Bastien From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 10 12:33:47 2013 Received: (at 13668) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2013 17:33:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49277 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4amh-0008AI-7r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:33:47 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:59845) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4ame-0008AA-Sq for 13668@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:33:45 -0500 Received: from adsl-68-77-17-140.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net ([68.77.17.140]:47969 helo=regnitz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4amO-0000lo-Nt; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:33:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20759.55782.687925.263736@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:33:26 -0600 From: "Roland Winkler" To: Bastien Subject: Re: bug#13668: 24.2.93; strike-through in org mode In-Reply-To: <87d2w82ivf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87fw153vsd.fsf@gnu.org> <87halkn6bz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20759.39415.151607.366601@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87zjzc2kxx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20759.54259.751629.173184__25253.7636356012$1360516174$gmane$org@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87d2w82ivf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> X-Mailer: VM 8.2 trial under 24.2.93.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13668 Cc: 13668@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) On Sun Feb 10 2013 Bastien wrote: > Please provide a patch. I'd much appreciate if the org developers could do that. I have enough such things on my own emacs agenda, From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 11 09:58:30 2013 Received: (at 13668) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2013 14:58:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51012 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4upw-0002ZY-D7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:58:30 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:64522) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4upa-0002Z0-B5 for 13668@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:58:18 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l13so3246111wie.2 for <13668@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:57:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:references :user-agent:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=K7zHZ0rDZtWHMSRJcItaFDqaA/2jbVWu63YKUTHeOJw=; b=dO4nUeF2kFvD2ATp/6xDWjhj4rqH5OzulVd13niHU0AlhK310Ku3xUnzZysIKYHiXV psMRUmkeMLXL+nEB3WP42WJD5Fx07h98EHcVQ+BCq6qcUQfKVPRlpN5ctMYFeMmik13F KCVdQ40LbA2vAWpnvUi7OkdieEbKgamZf+NZE7g7OQoDL8dt14DypWY6qQ5bbEQsa+va owHXRBtLeQyird8squb2LoNVzREx++g6duMmdrH5stdRdJs7jDBwvvPPtPd170ZHBR2c MwM/PU6+ru/t5i90foiSJEP9JR2iVMAL/45COsZikstN46wz6STlYpAwASn3GLi8LRgJ Dmwg== X-Received: by 10.194.76.37 with SMTP id h5mr17464075wjw.21.1360594665331; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:57:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from bzg.localdomain (128-79-136-150.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr. [128.79.136.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e12sm33730288wiw.5.2013.02.11.06.57.42 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:57:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A80B41C21484; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:57:18 +0100 (CET) From: Bastien To: "Roland Winkler" Subject: Re: bug#13668: 24.2.93; strike-through in org mode In-Reply-To: <20759.55782.687925.263736@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Roland Winkler's message of "Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:33:26 -0600") Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:04:34 +0100 References: <87fw153vsd.fsf@gnu.org> <87halkn6bz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20759.39415.151607.366601@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87zjzc2kxx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20759.54259.751629.173184__25253.7636356012$1360516174$gmane$org@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87d2w82ivf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20759.55782.687925.263736@gargle.gargle.HOWL> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Message-ID: <87r4kmj3u9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13668 Cc: 13668@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) "Roland Winkler" writes: > On Sun Feb 10 2013 Bastien wrote: >> Please provide a patch. > > I'd much appreciate if the org developers could do that. I have > enough such things on my own emacs agenda, Done in Org's git repository, thanks. -- Bastien From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 11 12:10:32 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2013 17:10:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51056 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4wtk-0006SR-0F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:10:32 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:41421) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4wth-0006SH-Py for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:10:30 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4wtM-0000eT-60 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:10:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:10:08 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 13668 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) close 13668 From unknown Tue Aug 19 23:15:35 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator