Subject: bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:19:58 -0500

>> BTW, one more useful option would be "run it when the current command
>> finishes".
> IIUC, this will require adding a queue of postponed commands,

You could just add-function on the process-sentinel.
But as pointed out elsewhere, another option is to actually let both
processes run in the same buffer.

        Stefan