Subject: bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question

From: Juri Linkov <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:52:43 +0200

> You guys are forgetting what the user really wants in the first place.
> All he wants to do is do another
> $ some_command &
> as in the shell.
> He is used to doing lots of these without regard if the previous one has
> finished yet or not... else what fun would asynchronous be?
>
> Therefore the wisest thing would be to automatically create
> *Async Output of bla gla* (or no word Async)
> *Async Output of moo goo*
> *Async Output of bla gla<2>*
> for him, without bothering him with questions.

You can customize `async-shell-command-buffer' to `new-buffer'
(labeled "Create a new buffer") that creates new buffers
automatically without questions.