From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 02 19:11:51 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2013 00:11:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33332 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nBW-0003Vf-Fp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:11:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44016) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nBS-0003VX-Nq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:11:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nAT-0008Vo-8a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:10:50 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:35845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nAT-0008Vc-63 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:10:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nAP-0007zL-Al for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:10:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nAL-0008U4-7G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:10:41 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:34194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nAK-0008Tn-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:10:37 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF5B20DBE for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 18:35:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:35:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secretsauce.net; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= mesmtp; bh=aq+takvepHyKl/NZ6nh/FLMyET4=; b=gs9WGEkyPWcL/oMN9pxdt fFNGqUdM5JnCaaM512eMK+3dN5SvcCrbJqWiXO3Qf4tHqRTD8whhkKxjY/UJO3Po nabN44iXByv9xbPP7dqgqViE2iC3E1zKlI3J+0fygET/7A5w9PgMdMLJIvEMH47M qGubWwHM/LgoAC7EK1EGsE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=aq+takvepHyKl/NZ6nh/FL MyET4=; b=rS9tjffizuD6HBFOR0iOIWkZzET5dtSwICk4oFKaVAJ9QQk6SCykS/ cDW/35h41zyiFovdVF/u4rJw7HG4M0LjJ77xdWTTUsz81qELDGwRFeNv0VP1AVef P1J7thdUsx94cmYR3Jyvx5/LLzgP9HVrTDsf4j/pCqLBGlSJnApCA= X-Sasl-enc: MifHfAUOTi9penL4WgQaKcc4eNgty1dHWAC8WNT3QvW3 1359848118 Received: from shorty.local (unknown [76.169.247.77]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A76368E0912 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 18:35:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from dima by shorty.local with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U1mc9-0005D6-Ah for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:35:17 -0800 From: Dima Kogan To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3.50; Incorrect syntax highlighting in cc-mode Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:35:17 -0800 Message-ID: <874nhuguh6.fsf@shorty.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) I'm observing incorrect highlighting of some C code I'm looking at. This issue appears to have been around at least since emacs23. Make a file tst.c with the following in it: void f(void) { filter_R( dt ); filter_t( dt ); a = b; } I'm observing the filter_R line being colored differently from the filter_t line. Everything on the filter_R line is using the 'default' face. 'filter_t' uses font-lock-type-face. 'dt' on the filter_t line uses font-lock-variable-name-face. In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw scroll bars) of 2012-12-31 on dex, modified by Debian (emacs-snapshot package, version 2:20121231-1) Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11204000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 7.0 (wheezy) Configured using: `configure --build x86_64-linux-gnu --host x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --localstatedir=/var --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-pop=yes --enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs-snapshot:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/24.3.50/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/24.3.50/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp --without-compress-info --with-crt-dir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ --with-x=yes --with-x-toolkit=lucid' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: C value of $LANG: C locale-coding-system: nil default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: C/l Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t abbrev-mode: t Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug sendmail gnus-util message cl-macs gv format-spec rfc822 mml mml-sec mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mailabbrev mail-utils gmm-utils mailheader reporter etags ring info misearch multi-isearch pp wid-edit descr-text reposition jka-compr find-func thai-util thai-word mule-util help-mode help-fns crm thingatpt cc-langs cl nadvice cl-lib cc-mode cc-fonts easymenu cc-guess cc-menus cc-cmds cc-styles cc-align cc-engine cc-vars cc-defs time-date tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel x-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list newcomment lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev minibuffer loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process dbusbind inotify dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting x-toolkit x multi-tty emacs) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 02 22:49:38 2013 Received: (at 13612) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2013 03:49:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U1qaI-0002T0-JE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 22:49:38 -0500 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:64191) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U1qaG-0002Ss-Dk for 13612@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 22:49:37 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MHM00G00L3FZV00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 13612@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 05:48:37 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MHM00G3GL91ZP10@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 05:48:37 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 05:48:41 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#13612: 24.3.50; Incorrect syntax highlighting in cc-mode In-reply-to: <874nhuguh6.fsf@shorty.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Dima Kogan Message-id: <834nhuawh2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874nhuguh6.fsf@shorty.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13612 Cc: 13612@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > From: Dima Kogan > Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:35:17 -0800 > > void f(void) > { > filter_R( dt ); > filter_t( dt ); > > a = b; > } > > > > I'm observing the filter_R line being colored differently from the > filter_t line. Everything on the filter_R line is using the 'default' > face. 'filter_t' uses font-lock-type-face. The "foo_t" tokens are taken as data types, AFAIK, to support size_t, off_t, etc. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 04 16:03:19 2013 Received: (at 13612) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2013 21:03:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TC7-0000J6-DX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:03:19 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:43472) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TC2-0000Iv-96 for 13612@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:03:14 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4ABA20AF0 for <13612@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:02:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:02:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secretsauce.net; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=hWf2P/Sh6huoaeuejW+CQNT8DHk=; b=IYmp1n+pzkq4V5KxH1cOQarvvVdC Js8+psjn8rtSv1siG2z1/feyUuL+MyZLQIrocKxCwe7ilEDcB3ZDpzTm5zR5YHm4 AdRQjJ1rDV6+SR4rIDrugRH0xCzx7WdP3P2GXRb4CDhEQ6mnfEMQavDMt8v7beD9 mTfyibHHMfEyyCQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=hWf2P/Sh6huoaeuejW+CQN T8DHk=; b=QOs80SLOt54nIenEym6EalPPWSzmVbBHvcf/JUj4WVi/x8aBEDUlV5 LwMsLTo1Uq9pINR6wlk3cbYNOUIP2P+AST28e2SMypTMM/FlRTYWBPMe6ZECRnNa p6q7OVkBQECPiYnCac6FU4IVh9iz+zBPPhmDSOF2tYIdy3IMfhEkI= X-Sasl-enc: iZr2GI2ZZkB139QsIFp/Z2ugGh0MTZ6zv++VFRTlfPyA 1360011722 Received: from fatty (unknown [204.154.109.20]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4FC224827A4 for <13612@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:02:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:59:44 -0800 From: Dima Kogan To: 13612@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#13612: 24.3.50; Incorrect syntax highlighting in cc-mode Message-ID: <20130204125944.77cf078a@fatty> In-Reply-To: <834nhuawh2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874nhuguh6.fsf@shorty.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <834nhuawh2.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13612 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) > On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 05:48:41 +0200 > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Dima Kogan > > Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:35:17 -0800 > > > > void f(void) > > { > > filter_R( dt ); > > filter_t( dt ); > > > > a = b; > > } > > > > I'm observing the filter_R line being colored differently from the > > filter_t line. Everything on the filter_R line is using the > > 'default' face. 'filter_t' uses font-lock-type-face. > > The "foo_t" tokens are taken as data types, AFAIK, to support size_t, > off_t, etc. Ah, that makes sense now. Ideally emacs should be able to separate the two cases, but maybe this is not significant enough to care. Thoughts? Should I close this bug? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 04 16:16:11 2013 Received: (at 13612) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2013 21:16:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36432 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TOc-0000be-Lt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:16:11 -0500 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:45199) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TOa-0000bV-9w for 13612@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:16:09 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MHP00800S7LAK00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 13612@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:14:59 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MHP00866SCZ5H40@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:14:59 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:15:08 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#13612: 24.3.50; Incorrect syntax highlighting in cc-mode In-reply-to: <20130204125944.77cf078a@fatty> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Dima Kogan Message-id: <83ip67aihv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874nhuguh6.fsf@shorty.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <834nhuawh2.fsf@gnu.org> <20130204125944.77cf078a@fatty> X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13612 Cc: 13612@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:59:44 -0800 > From: Dima Kogan > > Should I close this bug? No, I suggest to wait for a word from the maintainer of CC Mode. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 09:56:04 2013 Received: (at 13612) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2013 14:56:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37988 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2jwK-00028r-3i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:56:04 -0500 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:53543 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2jwE-00028V-Sd for 13612@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:56:00 -0500 Received: (qmail 87530 invoked by uid 3782); 5 Feb 2013 14:54:46 -0000 Received: from acm.muc.de (pD955633E.dip.t-dialin.net [217.85.99.62]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:54:44 +0100 Received: (qmail 5847 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Feb 2013 14:54:06 -0000 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:54:06 +0000 To: Dima Kogan Subject: Re: bug#13612: 24.3.50; Incorrect syntax highlighting in cc-mode Message-ID: <20130205145405.GA3674@acm.acm> References: <874nhuguh6.fsf@shorty.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <834nhuawh2.fsf@gnu.org> <20130204125944.77cf078a@fatty> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130204125944.77cf078a@fatty> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Alan Mackenzie X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13612 Cc: 13612@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Hi, Dima! On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:59:44PM -0800, Dima Kogan wrote: > > On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 05:48:41 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Dima Kogan > > > Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:35:17 -0800 > > > void f(void) > > > { > > > filter_R( dt ); > > > filter_t( dt ); > > > a = b; > > > } > > > I'm observing the filter_R line being colored differently from the > > > filter_t line. Everything on the filter_R line is using the > > > 'default' face. 'filter_t' uses font-lock-type-face. > > The "foo_t" tokens are taken as data types, AFAIK, to support size_t, > > off_t, etc. > Ah, that makes sense now. Ideally emacs should be able to separate the two > cases, ...... Do M-x customize-variable c-font-lock-extra-types, remove the entry "\sw+_t", then reinitialise C Mode like it says. The false fontification should then be gone. > ..... but maybe this is not significant enough to care. Thoughts? > Should I close this bug? Yes please, close it as "not a bug". Thanks! -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 12:03:07 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2013 17:03:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38132 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2lvG-0005Cz-Po for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:03:06 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:34022) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2lvF-0005Ct-Pv for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:03:06 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2lu6-0007Ar-3H for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:01:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:01:54 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 13612 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) tag 13612 notabug close 13612 From unknown Tue Jun 24 03:23:11 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator