GNU bug report logs - #13594
24.2.92; [PATCH] compilation-start doesn't consider nil OUTWIN

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:45:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 24.2.92

Done: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Cc: Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>, 13594 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#13594: 24.2.92; [PATCH] compilation-start doesn't consider nil OUTWIN
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 01:55:08 +0800
On 2013-02-12 01:31 +0800, martin rudalics wrote:
>> Do you think it is possible to implement a special "hidden" window type
>> so callers could operate on it invisibly to the user?
>
> Not really.  If you call `with-selected-window' on such a window and get
> stuck in it, the display routines would probably have to find their way
> out of such a situation.
>
> We could, as Stefan proposed, use the root window of an invisible frame
> for this.  But as I mentioned earlier, this has the disadvantage that
> you have to somehow clean up that frame when you delete the last visible
> frame.  Officially, `delete-frame' should handle this case but at least
> here on Windows XP it certainly doesn't.  And I'm quite sure that we can
> find at least one window manager where sampling the visibility of frames
> is not 100% reliable.
>
> martin

What happens if we just return a minibuffer window to display-buffer?
(still ugly as hell)

Leo




This bug report was last modified 11 years and 234 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.