GNU bug report logs - #13594
24.2.92; [PATCH] compilation-start doesn't consider nil OUTWIN

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:45:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 24.2.92

Done: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 13594 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>, martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Subject: bug#13594: Planning Emacs-24.4
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 02:54:19 +0200
>> OK, thank you for the quick response. I have re-worked the patch based
>> on Stefan's and your comments. Please review it. Thanks.
>
> Fine by me, thank you (I don't like `non-window-ok' either, but again
> I have nothing better to suggest for replacement).

A good name depends on how the users will customize it.

Currently display-buffer supports these actions:

 `display-buffer-same-window'
 `display-buffer-reuse-window'
 `display-buffer-pop-up-frame'
 `display-buffer-pop-up-window'
 `display-buffer-use-some-window'

Then a new action could have a name:

 `display-buffer-no-window'

The existing ALIST entries are:

 `inhibit-same-window'
 `inhibit-switch-frame'

Then a new property could be:

 `allow-no-window'

And the new action `display-buffer-no-window' could check
if `allow-no-window' is non-nil then it will return t
(for which `display-buffer' will return nil to the caller).




This bug report was last modified 11 years and 234 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.