GNU bug report logs - #1355
suggestion on the modeline

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: xah lee <xah <at> xahlee.org>

Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 01:20:03 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #57 received at 1355 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
Cc: 1355 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#1355: suggestion on the modeline
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:30:07 -0500
>> %p -- print percent of buffer above top of window, or Top, Bot or All.

> How about:

>     %p -- print Top, Bot, All, or how far through the buffer the window
>     is (in percent).  This is 100 * A / (A + B), where A is the number
>     bytes above the window, B the number below it.

>> Also, the same change should be done to %P, shouldn't it?
 
> Hmmm.  :-)  If so, than %p + %P = 100% (modulo rounding errors), and %P
> is kind of redundant.  So, for backwards compatibility, %p and %P should
> remain unchanged, and 100 * A / (A + B) should be attached to a new
> %-construct, say %v.  (Why %v?  Why not?  It's reminiscent of C-v, and
> %M-v.)

You'd have to ask people who use %P: how do they use it?  Why (or what for)?
Maybe it's OK to have %P represent B/(A+B), or maybe a better solution
would be to offer access to A/(A+B) as well as (TOTAL-A-B)/TOTAL
(i.e. percentage of buffer shown).

I don't think it's urgent, so we should take the time to try and figure
out what %P users want.


        Stefan




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 301 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.