GNU bug report logs -
#13509
wrong "definition in expression context" in R6RS mode
Previous Next
Reported by: marco.maggi-ipsu <at> poste.it
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:07:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:10:07 -0500
with message-id <874nhxj328.fsf <at> tines.lan>
and subject line Re: bug#13509: wrong "definition in expression context" in R6RS mode
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #13509,
regarding wrong "definition in expression context" in R6RS mode
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
13509: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13509
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
On my i686-pc-linux-gnu running:
$ guile --version
guile (GNU Guile) 2.1.0.1329-d7cb7
built from the head of the "master" branch, this program:
#!r6rs
(import (rnrs))
(define (alpha)
(define-syntax define-special
(syntax-rules ()
((_ ?who ?val)
(define ?who ?val))))
(define-special beta #t)
#f)
(alpha)
should succeed, but instead it fails with:
;;; compiling /home/marco/var/tmp/proof.sps
;;; WARNING: compilation of /home/marco/var/tmp/proof.sps failed:
;;; ERROR: Syntax error:
;;; /home/marco/var/tmp/proof.sps:12:2: definition in
;;; expression context, where definitions a re not allowed, in form (define beta #t)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:718:27: In procedure map:
ice-9/boot-9.scm:718:27: Syntax error:
/home/marco/var/tmp/proof.sps:12:2: definition in expression context, where definitions are not allowed, in form (define beta #t)
--
Marco Maggi
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Marco Maggi <marco.maggi-ipsu <at> poste.it> writes:
> #!r6rs
> (import (rnrs))
> (define (alpha)
> (define-syntax define-special
> (syntax-rules ()
> ((_ ?who ?val)
> (define ?who ?val))))
> (define-special beta #t)
> #f)
> (alpha)
>
> should succeed, but instead it fails with:
>
[...]
> ;;; /home/marco/var/tmp/proof.sps:12:2: definition in
> ;;; expression context, where definitions a re not allowed, in form (define beta #t)
Fixed in ceb7f9cc126f50e0cc8956b80ac5d111580b23c8
(which is now in stable-2.0 but not yet in master)
Thanks for the report!
Mark
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 173 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.