Subject: bug#13493: seq -s, 1 3 gives unexpected output

From: Morten Hustveit <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:27:31 -0800

Running "seq -s, 1 3" on coreutils 8.20 gives the output

  1
  2,3,

Running "seq -s, 1 3" on coreutils 8.13 gives the output

  1,2,3

I prefer the latter output.