GNU bug report logs - #1348
set-frame-width and set-frame-position seem buggy on at least MSWindows

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Themba Fletcher" <themba <at> shirleymachine.com>

Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:55:04 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Themba Fletcher <themba <at> shirleymachine.com>,
        1348 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: bug#1348: set-frame-width and set-frame-position seem buggy on at	least MSWindows
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:40:39 +0200
> From: "Themba Fletcher" <themba <at> shirleymachine.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:46:19 -0500
> Cc: 
> 
> When migrating to Emacs 22.3.1 on microsoft windows, the following
> lines in my .emacs file do not behave as expected:
> 
>   (set-frame-position (selected-frame) 0 0)
>   (sleep-for 2) ; not originally in my .emacs -- testing only
>   (set-frame-width (selected-frame) 150)
>   (sleep-for 2)
>   (set-frame-height (selected-frame) 55)
>   (sleep-for 2))
                 ^
(Extra paren here.)

> This used to leave me with a 150 X 55 frame located at 0,0 on my
> display but it instead now leaves me with a default size frame still
> located at 0,0 as expected.

This leaves me with a 80x55 frame located at (0,0), not a default size
frame.  I see this both in Emacs 22.3.1 and in the current CVS trunk.

So, while still not entirely correct, the behavior I see is different,
and I wonder why.  Is the above the _only_ contents of your .emacs?





This bug report was last modified 10 years and 296 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.