GNU bug report logs - #13465
24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename convention

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Milan Santosi <milan.santosi <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#13465: closed (Re: bug#13465: 24.3.50; mml attached gpg
 signature filename convention)
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 07:19:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#13465: 24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename convention

which was filed against the emacs,gnus package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 13465 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
13465: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13465
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 13465-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13465: 24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename convention
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 03:17:37 -0400

Version: 24.4

Glenn Morris wrote:

> mml-secure-sign to use:
>
>   Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

Done.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Milan Santosi <milan.santosi <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename convention
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:27:16 +0100

Minor bug / cosmetics.

I've been exchanging signed emails using Emacs recently and noticed that
unlike others (non-emacsers), the filename of my attached signature is
always "noname" instead of "signature.asc".

Help from #emacs on freenode leads me to line 719 in rmailmm.el where I
find the "noname" hardcoded. Shouldn't this read "signature.asc"
instead (which seems conventional)?

kind regards,

Milan Santosi

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.