Subject: bug#13465: closed (Re: bug#13465: 24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename convention)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 07:19:02 +0000

Your bug report

#13465: 24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename convention

which was filed against the emacs,gnus package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
13465: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13465
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#13465: 24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename convention
From: Glenn Morris <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 03:17:37 -0400
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

Version: 24.4

Glenn Morris wrote:

> mml-secure-sign to use:
>
>   Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

Done.

Subject: 24.3.50; mml attached gpg signature filename convention
From: Milan Santosi <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:27:16 +0100
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

Minor bug / cosmetics.

I've been exchanging signed emails using Emacs recently and noticed that
unlike others (non-emacsers), the filename of my attached signature is
always "noname" instead of "signature.asc".

Help from #emacs on freenode leads me to line 719 in rmailmm.el where I
find the "noname" hardcoded. Shouldn't this read "signature.asc"
instead (which seems conventional)?

kind regards,

Milan Santosi