From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 15 17:56:07 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2013 22:56:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34011 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvFQM-0003Fl-5e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:56:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40392) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvF8x-0002py-PW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:38:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvF8O-0003Td-U6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:37:36 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:33637) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvF8O-0003TZ-S8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:37:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvF8L-0007Ux-4m for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:37:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvF8I-0003Ru-1y for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:37:29 -0500 Received: from mx1.norvax.com ([64.213.165.35]:39168 helo=spam.norvax.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvF8H-0003Re-T0 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:37:25 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1358289443-049ba753e9d25f80001-6wKBYj Received: from EXCHANGE2.norvax.net (exchange2.norvax.net [10.10.10.238]) by spam.norvax.com with ESMTP id jQFZ2BXirAxDQDR0 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:37:23 -0600 (CST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: DMiller@gohealth.com Received: from EXCHANGE2.norvax.net ([192.168.200.238]) by exchange2 ([192.168.200.238]) with mapi; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:37:22 -0600 From: Dennis Miller To: "bug-coreutils@gnu.org" Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:37:21 -0600 Subject: comm Thread-Topic: comm X-ASG-Orig-Subj: comm Thread-Index: Ac3zcOG+df74ctiZTkOYEK1l5jT8/g== Message-ID: <3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7D96@exchange2> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7D96exchange2_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: exchange2.norvax.net[10.10.10.238] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1358289443 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES128-SHA X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.168.10.231:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at norvax.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.119962 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:56:04 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) --_000_3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7D96exchange2_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello there, Not really a bug per se, but a nice feature would be if a check was done to= just sort the given files before hand. If you don't sort it, you will get= undesired output, and this would be a good safety check. Thanks. ________________________________ Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If yo= u are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for deliv= ery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this messag= e to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notif= y the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your emplo= yer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions,= conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to th= e official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor end= orsed by it. --_000_3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7D96exchange2_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello there,

 

Not really a bug per se, but a nice feature would be= if a check was done to just sort the given files before hand.  If you= don’t sort it, you will get undesired output, and this would be a go= od safety check.

 

Thanks.


Privileged/Confidential Info= rmation may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indi= cated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such p= erson), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindl= y notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or you= r employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Op= inions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my firm sha= ll be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
 --_000_3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7D96exchange2_-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 15 21:59:01 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2013 02:59:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34263 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvJDQ-0002OP-Rk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:59:01 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56768) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvJDO-0002OB-0V; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:58:59 -0500 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0G2wLTo021792 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:58:22 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.75] (ovpn-113-75.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.75]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0G2wKeU012017; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:58:21 -0500 Message-ID: <50F5EF25.3040704@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:07:01 -0700 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dennis Miller Subject: Re: bug#13453: comm References: <3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7D96@exchange2> In-Reply-To: <3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7D96@exchange2> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.0 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2SCOVUPGWKUOAPPFWECKD" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: 13453-done@debbugs.gnu.org, control@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2SCOVUPGWKUOAPPFWECKD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable tag 13453 notabug thanks On 01/15/2013 03:37 PM, Dennis Miller wrote: > Hello there, >=20 > Not really a bug per se, Still, by sending a message to bug-coreutils, you've opened a bug track id. That is okay for feature requests (a new feature request is arguably a bug of a missing functionality); but if you don't need to spawn a bug id, then sending mail to coreutils@gnu.org is better. > but a nice feature would be if a check was done to just sort the given = files before hand. What version of coreutils are you using? This functionality is already present in modern coreutils - by default, comm warns you if it gets confused because the file is not in sorted order; comm --check-order warns you in even more situations; and comm --nocheck-order silences the default check. > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. Unfortunately, this mail is now publicly archived, rendering this disclaimer unenforceable. It is considered poor netiquette to tack on your employer's disclaimers to public lists, and we recommend using personal email accounts to avoid the problem. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org ------enig2SCOVUPGWKUOAPPFWECKD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQ9e8lAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqVrkH/0h+Dq6jaUjNj8smUSORaCBC 7grtJA2/40exI6jskQnRZuBbcQcM4Oivq4zcKkGBsihMx46W0oZA1RRJpTYQ31tn TP8GWtNVcZYbFYybYfNHCy6rRg8hH9isSxZkV7lv4RrNW7iGV7F5ZIMiVuBoSCK0 XrAWkDW4OMVyoPDa2WYEXYL6kUdVC5hnjLlK6bDA9AfJ0nkM15B60DW15WD7ie1P cSGNACuRFNpzjCwM2WfS60NOq25luu8Kix4pASNtug/ge/fbOt/KTdJoOcJzP0kv VPCrxdjMQJJUCTyQq2N6xZsm2Ol7fR9DhF5qGwPBwoQRHoTB5GHOInY/JKhDWMk= =bryn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2SCOVUPGWKUOAPPFWECKD-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 11:45:58 2013 Received: (at 13453) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2013 16:45:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35491 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvW7i-0006TK-DE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:45:58 -0500 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]:40191) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvW7f-0006T8-GB; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:45:56 -0500 Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D3A211D5; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:45:18 -0700 (MST) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9FBCD2DCD9; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:45:18 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:45:18 -0700 From: Bob Proulx To: Dennis Miller Subject: Re: bug#13453: comm Message-ID: <20130116164518.GA27509@hysteria.proulx.com> References: <3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7D96@exchange2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7D96@exchange2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13453 Cc: 13453@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) tags 13453 + moreinfo thanks Dennis Miller wrote: > Not really a bug per se, but a nice feature would be if a check was > done to just sort the given files before hand. If you don't sort > it, you will get undesired output, and this would be a good safety > check. Have you seen the GNU comm --check-order and --nocheck-order options? These options do exactly what you are asking for it to do. Here is the documentation for them from the comm docs: If the `--check-order' option is given, unsorted inputs will cause a fatal error message. If the option `--nocheck-order' is given, unsorted inputs will never cause an error message. If neither of these options is given, wrongly sorted inputs are diagnosed only if an input file is found to contain unpairable lines. If an input file is diagnosed as being unsorted, the `comm' command will exit with a nonzero status (and the output should not be used). Forcing `comm' to process wrongly sorted input files containing unpairable lines by specifying `--nocheck-order' is not guaranteed to produce any particular output. The output will probably not correspond with whatever you hoped it would be. `--check-order' Fail with an error message if either input file is wrongly ordered. `--nocheck-order' Do not check that both input files are in sorted order. Bob > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this > message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or > responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not > copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should > destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply > email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not > consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, > conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate > to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither > given nor endorsed by it. READ CAREFULLY. By reading this email, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licences, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 11:54:24 2013 Received: (at 13453) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2013 16:54:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35499 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvWFr-0006fN-Rg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:54:24 -0500 Received: from mx1.norvax.com ([64.213.165.35]:34147 helo=spam.norvax.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvWFp-0006fG-58 for 13453@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:54:22 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1358355218-049ba753ead44080001-YhOvIj Received: from EXCHANGE2.norvax.net (exchange2.norvax.net [10.10.10.238]) by spam.norvax.com with ESMTP id RP77erx7QzNrwu36 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:53:38 -0600 (CST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: DMiller@gohealth.com Received: from EXCHANGE2.norvax.net ([192.168.200.238]) by exchange2 ([192.168.200.238]) with mapi; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:53:38 -0600 From: Dennis Miller To: Bob Proulx Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:53:37 -0600 Subject: RE: bug#13453: comm Thread-Topic: bug#13453: comm X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: bug#13453: comm Thread-Index: Ac30COC2rqk4sskzSVSEHMV4p+w/zwAARIpg Message-ID: <3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7E4E@exchange2> References: <3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7D96@exchange2> <20130116164518.GA27509@hysteria.proulx.com> In-Reply-To: <20130116164518.GA27509@hysteria.proulx.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: exchange2.norvax.net[10.10.10.238] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1358355218 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES128-SHA X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.168.10.231:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at norvax.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.120034 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13453 Cc: "13453@debbugs.gnu.org" <13453@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) My version doesn't have those options. I'm running GNU coreutils 5.97-34.e= l5_8.1. What version has these options? -----Original Message----- From: Bob Proulx [mailto:bob@proulx.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:45 AM To: Dennis Miller Cc: 13453@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#13453: comm tags 13453 + moreinfo thanks Dennis Miller wrote: > Not really a bug per se, but a nice feature would be if a check was > done to just sort the given files before hand. If you don't sort it, > you will get undesired output, and this would be a good safety check. Have you seen the GNU comm --check-order and --nocheck-order options? These options do exactly what you are asking for it to do. Here is the doc= umentation for them from the comm docs: If the `--check-order' option is given, unsorted inputs will cause a fatal error message. If the option `--nocheck-order' is given, unsorted inputs will never cause an error message. If neither of these options is given, wrongly sorted inputs are diagnosed only if an input file is found to contain unpairable lines. If an input file is diagnosed as being unsorted, the `comm' command will exit with a nonzero status (and the output should not be used). Forcing `comm' to process wrongly sorted input files containing unpairable lines by specifying `--nocheck-order' is not guaranteed to produce any particular output. The output will probably not correspond with whatever you hoped it would be. `--check-order' Fail with an error message if either input file is wrongly ordered. `--nocheck-order' Do not check that both input files are in sorted order. Bob > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. > If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible > for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or > deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this > message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise > immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet email > for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this message that do not relate to the official business of my firm > shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. READ CAREFULLY. By reading this email, you agree, on behalf of your employ= er, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all= NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licences, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwr= ap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable= use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your emplo= yer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without pr= ejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that yo= u have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of y= our employer. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If yo= u are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for deliv= ery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this messag= e to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notif= y the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your emplo= yer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions,= conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to th= e official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor end= orsed by it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 12:05:19 2013 Received: (at 13453) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2013 17:05:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35513 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvWQQ-0007oP-36 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:05:18 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:57633) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvWQN-0007oH-Hi for 13453@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:05:16 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.11] (p4FC3E6F0.dip.t-dialin.net [79.195.230.240]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LZf8m-1TEVYw1f4O-00lUU4; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:04:30 +0100 Message-ID: <50F6DD9D.8020207@bernhard-voelker.de> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:04:29 +0100 From: Bernhard Voelker User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dennis Miller Subject: Re: bug#13453: comm References: <3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7D96@exchange2> <20130116164518.GA27509@hysteria.proulx.com> <3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7E4E@exchange2> In-Reply-To: <3E42648B21EDDB43B8248229CC80427B7D650D7E4E@exchange2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:E0VcuXlXaOj48SfbY5eWSiRe/OyFrVXy8DZvt5t5fU6 8DcNnioh7epon/E9FXWjr4JjY9ZATU0xBsUv8eWikPU+xYw2PJ gvDCnSW0mS27PeBtCygo8s8nLTDVKsQiocCbceby2MtHM5VxC5 ijk0bOFI04g1jZhaTInDyVaChQaWrqtwFxvtrmzPKWb62nKtkI 7o34AjBFxZHeyB4lCjM8cf0L2jboSRQN5mqv/mIpDhlHEv3Nzk DVf6CugbmCaOCHqicb8BDqa7MObAraZ34Y1FBb0hhM4ZCyJS6c 2rFefmJNXvJ9/dkOUxp4bB0+6nk32SGextbyzH9btiGIozHnDo UlpRDJno1pBGFKuNSoj0laAhsDoyy4OPU6yger8hq X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13453 Cc: Bob Proulx , "13453@debbugs.gnu.org" <13453@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) On 01/16/2013 05:53 PM, Dennis Miller wrote: > My version doesn't have those options. I'm running > GNU coreutils 5.97-34.el5_8.1. What version has these options? The option --check-order has been added in coreutils-7.0 back in 2008. Have a nice day, Berny From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 15:39:17 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2013 20:39:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvZlU-0004c2-HP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:39:17 -0500 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]:41217) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvZlR-0004bq-NA for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:39:14 -0500 Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E77211DA for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:38:36 -0700 (MST) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 099A92DCD9; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:38:35 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:38:35 -0700 From: Bob Proulx To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: untag it Message-ID: <20130116203835.GA13306@hysteria.proulx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) tag 13453 - moreinfo thanks From unknown Sun Jun 22 17:14:59 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator