Subject: Re: bug#13391: dd silently ignores lseek error

From: Paul Eggert <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:58:02 -0800

On 01/08/2013 05:14 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:

> Worth applying the attached?

Looks good, except I would avoid calling lseek on
STDOUT_FILENO unless oflag=seekable is set.  Just being
conservative: the effect of lseek on unseekable files is
implementation-defined.