From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:54:19 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13375: documentation for trace-function and trace-function-background does not include reference to untrace-function Resent-From: Rudolf Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 13375 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13375@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.135758223630642 (code B ref -1); Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:11:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2013 18:10:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34476 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TsH9e-0007y9-1A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:10:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36773) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TsGyX-0007hM-0A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:59:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsGyL-0001XS-Sf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:58:54 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:55011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsGyL-0001XO-PV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:58:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48134) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsGyK-0001BR-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:58:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsGyJ-0001XA-RP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:58:52 -0500 Received: from mail-ia0-f170.google.com ([209.85.210.170]:63625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsGyJ-0001X4-LM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:58:51 -0500 Received: by mail-ia0-f170.google.com with SMTP id i1so16745438iaa.15 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:58:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=4yws6uP2uekRm18R8vcA6sJ2eR/BMYqUoWs9AYY2mUo=; b=EzbuLG46fZiA5L86qmizsg1cTGW7cc6u4uvLQFK2PUCf9NaIEjxl6x5ydf0U0y4/TG fnBsyC+QR4RggZIvqIut08V0w3fxp7MHDxQHihuhsdbf7cvBZIg2eGUCuPeKn8TrFMz7 Iil7+wCjAZeq8W5CQG/uPM+XQzsNCHWN+10+H9rrUySr6ZCgDQZ8vHZOBP+x1Ds0lyBx 9skyRaOxMG7lBfLyUK2DvJ/1pvVFqMaLteu8inTcpG1LbNlEfFrJdnOyX+jLkWOdxFZv IUAEGXWJEK4l+o5BJixQ9gGwwBMM23jF7hdFDK+WZ531+8QWRBxAaLpYpl7VAb0N/nY1 JqdA== Received: by 10.50.0.179 with SMTP id 19mr6281815igf.59.1357581530675; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:58:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.138.1 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 09:58:30 -0800 (PST) From: Rudolf Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 12:58:30 -0500 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f502fc0e3bb0a04d2b69454 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:10:32 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) --e89a8f502fc0e3bb0a04d2b69454 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It was hard to figure out how to remove a trace from a function. There's no mention in the trace-function, trace-function-background functions at all about the untrace-function and untrace-all. The only hint about how to remove the trace is that it's advice, "This function generates trace advice for..." which isn't helpful enough. You can reproduce this bug with these commands: C-h f trace-function C-h f trace-function-background and notice the lack of mention of untrace-function and untrace-all. Emacs version: GNU Emacs 24.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.12) of 2012-09-22 on panlong, modified by Debian Operating system: Kubuntu Thanks, Rudolf Olah --e89a8f502fc0e3bb0a04d2b69454 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It was hard to figure out how to remove a trace from a fun= ction. There's no mention in the trace-function, trace-function-backgro= und functions at all about the untrace-function and untrace-all.

The only hint about how to remove the trace is that it's advice, &= quot;This function generates trace advice for..." which isn't help= ful enough.

You can reproduce this bug with = these commands:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 C-h f trace-function
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 C-h f trace-function-background

<= /div>
and notice the lack of mention of untrace-function and untr= ace-all.

Emacs version: GNU Emacs 24.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GT= K+ Version 2.24.12) of 2012-09-22 on panlong, modified by Debian

Operating system: Kubuntu

Thanks,
Rudolf Olah
--e89a8f502fc0e3bb0a04d2b69454-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:54:19 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Rudolf Subject: bug#13375: closed (Re: bug#13375: documentation for trace-function and trace-function-background does not include reference to untrace-function) Message-ID: References: <6bwqvnuhm9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 13375 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 13375@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 04:05:03 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1357704303-9911-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1357704303-9911-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #13375: documentation for trace-function and trace-function-background does= not include reference to untrace-function which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 13375@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 13375: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D13375 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1357704303-9911-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 13375-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2013 04:04:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57603 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tsmu9-0002ZI-7m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:04:42 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:45790 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tsmu6-0002ZB-VG for 13375-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:04:39 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tsmty-0004NF-OZ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:04:30 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 13375-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#13375: documentation for trace-function and trace-function-background does not include reference to untrace-function References: X-Spook: offensive information warfare Saddam Hussein Ermes X-Ran: ReiKGVj/lsYGvXK^@E:c8qav-l4PY X-Hue: red X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:04:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Rudolf's message of "Mon, 7 Jan 2013 12:58:30 -0500") Message-ID: <6bwqvnuhm9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13375-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Version: 24.2.92 Thanks; fixed. ------------=_1357704303-9911-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2013 18:10:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34476 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TsH9e-0007y9-1A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:10:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36773) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TsGyX-0007hM-0A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:59:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsGyL-0001XS-Sf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:58:54 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:55011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsGyL-0001XO-PV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:58:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48134) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsGyK-0001BR-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:58:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsGyJ-0001XA-RP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:58:52 -0500 Received: from mail-ia0-f170.google.com ([209.85.210.170]:63625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsGyJ-0001X4-LM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:58:51 -0500 Received: by mail-ia0-f170.google.com with SMTP id i1so16745438iaa.15 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:58:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=4yws6uP2uekRm18R8vcA6sJ2eR/BMYqUoWs9AYY2mUo=; b=EzbuLG46fZiA5L86qmizsg1cTGW7cc6u4uvLQFK2PUCf9NaIEjxl6x5ydf0U0y4/TG fnBsyC+QR4RggZIvqIut08V0w3fxp7MHDxQHihuhsdbf7cvBZIg2eGUCuPeKn8TrFMz7 Iil7+wCjAZeq8W5CQG/uPM+XQzsNCHWN+10+H9rrUySr6ZCgDQZ8vHZOBP+x1Ds0lyBx 9skyRaOxMG7lBfLyUK2DvJ/1pvVFqMaLteu8inTcpG1LbNlEfFrJdnOyX+jLkWOdxFZv IUAEGXWJEK4l+o5BJixQ9gGwwBMM23jF7hdFDK+WZ531+8QWRBxAaLpYpl7VAb0N/nY1 JqdA== Received: by 10.50.0.179 with SMTP id 19mr6281815igf.59.1357581530675; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:58:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.138.1 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 09:58:30 -0800 (PST) From: Rudolf Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 12:58:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: documentation for trace-function and trace-function-background does not include reference to untrace-function To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f502fc0e3bb0a04d2b69454 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:10:32 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) --e89a8f502fc0e3bb0a04d2b69454 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It was hard to figure out how to remove a trace from a function. There's no mention in the trace-function, trace-function-background functions at all about the untrace-function and untrace-all. The only hint about how to remove the trace is that it's advice, "This function generates trace advice for..." which isn't helpful enough. You can reproduce this bug with these commands: C-h f trace-function C-h f trace-function-background and notice the lack of mention of untrace-function and untrace-all. Emacs version: GNU Emacs 24.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.12) of 2012-09-22 on panlong, modified by Debian Operating system: Kubuntu Thanks, Rudolf Olah --e89a8f502fc0e3bb0a04d2b69454 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It was hard to figure out how to remove a trace from a fun= ction. There's no mention in the trace-function, trace-function-backgro= und functions at all about the untrace-function and untrace-all.

The only hint about how to remove the trace is that it's advice, &= quot;This function generates trace advice for..." which isn't help= ful enough.

You can reproduce this bug with = these commands:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 C-h f trace-function
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 C-h f trace-function-background

<= /div>
and notice the lack of mention of untrace-function and untr= ace-all.

Emacs version: GNU Emacs 24.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GT= K+ Version 2.24.12) of 2012-09-22 on panlong, modified by Debian

Operating system: Kubuntu

Thanks,
Rudolf Olah
--e89a8f502fc0e3bb0a04d2b69454-- ------------=_1357704303-9911-1--