GNU bug report logs -
#13349
Could we just assume support for make recursive variable expansion unconditionally?
Previous Next
Full log
Message #49 received at 13349 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 11:53 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
>> On 2013-01-03 23:05 +0100, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>>
>>> TARGETS = all check clean distclean dist distcheck install uninstall
>>> .PHONY: $(TARGETS)
>>> $(TARGETS): ; @gmake $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) $@
>>
>> Unfortunately, this kind of wrapper doesn't work particularly well. If
>> the user runs something similar to:
>>
>> make -j2 all install
>>
>> then the wrapper makefile will happily fork off two independent make
>> instances in parallel: one running "gmake all" and one running "gmake
>> install". The result will probably be catastrophic.
>>
> Sigh, so very true. Adding ".NOTPARALLEL:" could fix this issue though.
> Assuming that it is portable enough ...
>
> At any case, the wrapper would be just a convenience for the most
> common cases, like:
>
> ./configure && make -j4 check && make install
>
> It doesn't have to work in all (or even most) scenarios.
This problem (use of wrong 'make') does not impact Automake-NG at all
and it does not seem wise to create a complex solution for a problem
which is seldom encountered and typically benign.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen <at> simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 165 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.