From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.135697573323184 (code B ref -1); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:43:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2012 17:42:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38298 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjNL-00061r-2h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:42:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjNC-00061e-As for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:42:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjLw-0005cw-6Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:51 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:59073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjLw-0005cs-12 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjLq-00085t-Or for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjLp-0005bM-Kx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:38 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com ([74.125.82.178]:51685) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjLp-0005bI-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:37 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x43so5976060wey.37 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:40:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=CRaCxWLxlkQOTSwJeUFxmEdQHJXBPJrUGFtDg3L9U5s=; b=fvODuNej09zkmhTP7M/7q1YuMBxkvjCic52e+PTlxb0d2bI1XfGKh2972e3cDrNIOv hwnUY8bn1OxxmSFMEjZrdKnXEbLlszK2i8LfL+nPnfDXtgkd2UjbzgClwChpPY9r6BUI BEuctqBzozmmGnohVyh3j3BXg9W7uFkq0HailQB01P+ns88wo8rqtgF5qT+XCRV1eT+Q bdCy4G5CSIF1pgs7YMoSfNq58J/VVmoM3pcLwYlgjdM1JkTpx99DGdF7mqA62BHWNxcR 9e1TVYQAg7wsQYG502mPqX1TPVLjPF5ponJzdZN8ZisSnmxb/lf0vkNI2fJZpFJurXDd FA+Q== X-Received: by 10.180.33.44 with SMTP id o12mr56790824wii.28.1356975636365; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:40:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell-14z (lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net. [78.243.104.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id df2sm67310583wib.0.2012.12.31.09.40.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:40:35 -0800 (PST) From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:40:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Hi, when replying to github I have now this message from gmail: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: notifications@github.com Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or 550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=6596 ci15si58841657wjb.6 (state 13). --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- this happen when using emacs from trunk. When I switch to emacs-24 branch Gnus works fine, gmail doesn't send such mails. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Thierry Volpiatto Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.135698565913229 (code B ref 13321); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:28:02 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2012 20:27:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38365 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TplxR-0003RG-KI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:27:39 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:48054) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TplxP-0003R8-2z for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:27:36 -0500 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3YZqmb0zJ7z3hhZJ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:26:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3YZqmZ60NTzbbgK; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:26:22 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R1nWcL6LFNCg; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:26:14 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: /TLwZvC7pgDHjQL3rfAAVsQeeYFKeh/aM5E7FCrdfB4= Received: from igel.home (ppp-93-104-157-148.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.157.148]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:26:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id E6D50CA2A2; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:26:21 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> X-Yow: NOW, I'm taking the NEXT FLIGHT to ACAPULCO so I can write POEMS about BROKEN GUITAR STRINGS and sensuous PRE-TEENS!! Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:26:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> (Thierry Volpiatto's message of "Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:40:27 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Thierry Volpiatto writes: > when replying to github What does "replying to github" mean? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Thierry Volpiatto Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.135715767818057 (code B ref 13321); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2013 20:14:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40405 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqUhx-0004hB-3J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:14:38 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:49304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqUhv-0004h3-6o for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:14:36 -0500 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqUgS-00005Z-UP; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:13:04 +0100 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> X-Now-Playing: Coil's _Musick To Play in the Dark vol 2_: "Ether" Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:13:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> (Thierry Volpiatto's message of "Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:40:27 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1TqUgS-00005Z-UP X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357762385.03055@5S17uuv+aruTFeBPacvL8g X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Thierry Volpiatto writes: > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > notifications@github.com > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the > recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for > further information about the cause of this error. The error that the > other server returned was: 550 550-5.1.1 The email account that you > tried to reach does not exist. Please try > 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or > 550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at > 550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=6596 ci15si58841657wjb.6 (state 13). Gmail seems to claim that notifications@github.com doesn't exist. Is that the address you tried to send something to? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.135716139923634 (code B ref 13321); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:17:02 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2013 21:16:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40427 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqVfv-000695-Ga for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:16:39 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com ([74.125.82.170]:53253) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqVfp-00068t-8Y for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:16:34 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r1so6873664wey.15 for <13321@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:15:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=v9s8GcCSYNec5kSv/kgZdROlCCPsAKpu5h2wxY0G6+A=; b=N7DJMMBsEI3O2ywSQ95hMT6bq0wcdjIVkt3EjwdkJg1aUekR3K/YnmAR4/F+LEDJ7Y 72eRoZ0qIlVHgtzeRL+E4PBuuruJHDfyRtowFSTsbrhBYBxHa7ESPkwEgocp+EziROz7 QUiTSVQ+tE/c5S5oyXRdYFunkvWDmwBLsJ1xK5BOjMcaAaGNx9cwjq7BSTARA2YpL3WI HATaRrNPvke4wG51PrZl99Naa2wwUXJ78yjE0EFseiJmQlK1phyHfkHdNxICrsYiy5gH uQET59rV1mt3gyvsrzSbytvlOrAqkuVow62P4XBJtauK8SYb+lLD09yi09GcBe+Fi7rd aWBg== X-Received: by 10.180.101.104 with SMTP id ff8mr72374438wib.11.1357161305528; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:15:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell-14z (lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net. [78.243.104.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bw9sm60113533wib.5.2013.01.02.13.15.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:15:04 -0800 (PST) From: Thierry Volpiatto Organization: Emacs Helm References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:14:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:13:04 +0100") Message-ID: <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Thierry Volpiatto writes: > >> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: >> >> notifications@github.com >> >> Technical details of permanent failure: >> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the >> recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for >> further information about the cause of this error. The error that the >> other server returned was: 550 550-5.1.1 The email account that you >> tried to reach does not exist. Please try >> 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or >> 550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at >> 550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=6596 ci15si58841657wjb.6 (state 13). > > Gmail seems to claim that notifications@github.com doesn't exist. And it doesn't exists. > Is that the address you tried to send something to? No. When you receive a mail from somebody that report you a bug on github the "From" header is like this: From: Bob And then Gnus ask: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Address `helm@noreply.github.com' might be bogus. Continue? (y or n) y Sending... Sending via mail... Delivering message to emacs-helm/helm ... --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- and it doesn't (shouldn't) try to send to but it does so when replying with emacs-24.3.50.1 (trunk). As I said this doesn't happen with emacs-24 branch (I replied several times today with no problems) Note: I use "F" to reply on github as always. (The mail is Cc'ed to the real address of sender) -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Thierry Volpiatto Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.135716712332444 (code B ref 13321); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:53:01 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2013 22:52:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqXAI-0008RF-CK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:52:03 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:57507) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqXAF-0008Qo-BJ for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:52:01 -0500 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqX8m-0004Cy-Dd; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:50:28 +0100 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEX+/v5QPDIyCRCxoon+ //7r6OEyHBtzYVAamfTQAAACZ0lEQVQ4jY2UPW/bMBCG1cZu5qNhctYJoNbYhMPVbVxkTaMynkkB 5GqKiPj3e5TkuENQ9IWgr0fv8Y48qoK8SN10MKar1qvTZ3qq1p++/zc4VpWpTNHLfCFNYP1iouGe pDqtstIxHSZAhmwcw9odzjHlToNYHKpLxiG2THW7kClVXhw/KdROCQLBqS722nT6A4wKmW96cowE jAIzgapiWkrY1uGw43JjOhWK43haG6bqATe8jThirWP0/QQqw5UY3da1LlBuDJhMx5/F8RsU586i 9NI76T369lTAfYbILZBiOeUscp7AV7HLGRZQPgggJvAlYpjBgNYC1hBnxzfNa29BxDkUhgHrOVSO VkV4L8By68LjDTQ5igdNwHPp2gHDMrgIJRsKFC13rk5o5zG8AAdzpjFn1+sQJ/DDxakKEiePD2/N eU6XM5T0lmEpo058aLoJfC9BHsvSptJUUdDjBJ4z5LSXWfpLaQhRip3Akwbe7yWQw4/Yp7Fe5uqJ 7GEvYwDlnetFtmhXM8gEyjQptNiITFO9AB0pVBoxYcQGMs9XoCINrphOyAiM0d9CwTgmPChEbIZ2 jIsjZw5psHgwSqdDDGxxPAM1bs+Qb83amKqUIVbHUrkv61/03ilFh9ZpBiil5BIdXqruodJl2y2g dTWX1L6XLudKaZY+wFBzvyPwCmjUI/Q3QM02OD+DHWzU6jSBPu5lTT14ed34v0Eb7Zu0iPJyLzYv SoFYQMPglwQEfrnz2wKsuIL2TKXU/nKHBDS1ywSeA/d6apL3M+1LpVJOE6B9vuh0vac/AIHP9T+g xFhf/xndH9RlFBXNbkqbAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: David Bowie's _Station To Station (2)_: "Stay" Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:50:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> (Thierry Volpiatto's message of "Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:14:55 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1TqX8m-0004Cy-Dd X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357771828.76708@cJVKtDdAq1bFbO3+HPhpqg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Thierry Volpiatto writes: > When you receive a mail from somebody that report you a bug on github > the "From" header is like this: > > From: Bob > > And then Gnus ask: > Address `helm@noreply.github.com' might be bogus. Continue? (y or n) y And Then Gnus asks? Spontaneously? Or do you use a command first? In which case, what command? And could you forward me one of these messages? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 05:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.135719126316655 (code B ref 13321); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 05:35:02 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2013 05:34:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40881 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqdRb-0004KW-6A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:34:23 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:42506) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqdRV-0004KL-DI for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:34:18 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hj13so8314192wib.1 for <13321@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:34:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=06DvB5Gf5zH66lU/lQeVJKjnACghc7tJgExzd8kU9gM=; b=AUkR5Vt2kDd7X5ADt/3JzWkY9OEfRfBtRbl/NFI3D/T5XU1aUQfbXNQIfBv8yBhha8 36HjRv1tDkAfQS+tSkJqHwox9Gf9nXgWoiJxPmJ3I9/puwgIl3wUZP20sAJAyuJHwWY6 Rn0IQhnKctOMDUvOOX1FYU3l+NVOw4nX4GC5nRm8axo2KLULDrbmDLsjYy/RuFGIREg+ qxhUr7hZZllBVqURScrm5NxHQGi/90RfXXv3r1a9GGRdSbnQrVBCFq4raJ04vMPAxGFU fWHybdYb/BIzVoGeVADL/eQepKhvwGq2hr+pqsrq2wiR6XzHHHHHLSlVOApZ/BWnmWYd smNw== X-Received: by 10.180.103.136 with SMTP id fw8mr65862216wib.27.1357191253396; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:34:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell-14z (lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net. [78.243.104.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dm3sm87984152wib.9.2013.01.02.21.34.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:34:12 -0800 (PST) From: Thierry Volpiatto Organization: Emacs Helm References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:34:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:50:27 +0100") Message-ID: <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Thierry Volpiatto writes: > >> When you receive a mail from somebody that report you a bug on github >> the "From" header is like this: >> >> From: Bob >> >> And then Gnus ask: >> Address `helm@noreply.github.com' might be bogus. Continue? (y or n) y > > And Then Gnus asks? Spontaneously? Yes, but not always and it does the same on emacs-24 branch without trying to send on . > Or do you use a command first? In which case, what command? > > And could you forward me one of these messages? Done. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Thierry Volpiatto Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.135719345320200 (code B ref 13321); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:11:02 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2013 06:10:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40894 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqe0y-0005Fh-5y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:10:53 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:46278) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqe0p-0005FR-Gb for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:10:48 -0500 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqe0g-0000ed-EU; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:10:34 +0100 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEVTPGI0FD393sDRpKJ7 WXOngpDqva66ua22AAACeUlEQVQ4jVWUQZLjIAxF5Rq8h6rkAmTiAwTjtTOGrN0BZT1l3Nz/CPNl O10ZqqsXPEv6+kihWlzWr2p/Tldng0N9TpkCs7e/1+USb+tjvW/gcUk5hucVoLc2Pv2jn98gsX9d +xA9wJ805fEAfOMXIuqarZ0ej8x7xFCrrctivb0CPPjRT3kDZExDjSap8bw++9c65cYYTUQNACnU sDnadVgnhqwzDYv96MFVOb0xLbmP3nwI0VVXfGMUwDuk5MDOs4MXdwCo6rb771Gl2hXnBgFEE9JK TLnryJyqQy4AQzrENFTkoVFD5hkZhvIFoEaimGyZjZ7+Nm0QXe7LBEp+VDku9ptC6tgNtau1fOmE zrXWarEXh+MH1KvVjydHeh5balF+KfhcdNQC8KKT46Hy1nbZ9dni6fwixWnpNmAPD7qSm/NAIQ72 AMepbjYnhtTlf9ChhNGBFMDlE1Tx8JffQOHlM1PfmMlT65buE8BGPG1EKtQuUfr4KYFhOEmNA+yo q44xPqcMB+HNDureHc9a5I4tjJAay9Y2SvgZ/gEoGArQOXc7QCaJCPKgAL1pcf0GxKRoqiXcLk0r AUv9AVLd308MyySTTEPGI7cALQRqsWw3xBUBDYBKOQQe3vsE0OhGAWjOkd8DKZMl4AxA+D7t95iQ HdAOIu+j3fk0dGgQAyprQEptQIYDPTm8k4LgDaiYak9aodLF812r0WwxoZG1ikOVJ2ApcQA1agVd tdSlwlyzAUmm8Avg9mUqjOfA1RYR8JewFzKJDpl2gO/jLIo5JRn0LWBTpSLP8k8mHaOzB9B+bzT0 yr3Ms+z+KKbLVsP/hB6QSZZflkn9A41Y31TzFRFDAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: David Bowie's _Black Tie White Noise_: "The Wedding" Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:10:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> (Thierry Volpiatto's message of "Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:34:09 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1Tqe0g-0000ed-EU X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357798234.8506@W4pekT/e+OKp4wXkSdYKpg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Thierry Volpiatto writes: > Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> Thierry Volpiatto writes: >> >>> When you receive a mail from somebody that report you a bug on github >>> the "From" header is like this: >>> >>> From: Bob >>> >>> And then Gnus ask: >>> Address `helm@noreply.github.com' might be bogus. Continue? (y or n) y >> >> And Then Gnus asks? Spontaneously? > Yes, but not always and it does the same on emacs-24 branch without > trying to send on . > >> Or do you use a command first? In which case, what command? You ... do something ... and then Gnus spontaneously starts asking you a question about "helm@noreply.github.com"? That sounds very odd indeed. Gnus normally doesn't send email messages without being told that it should do so. Are you sure you're not using a command to send an email or something? Like `f' or `r' or something? > To: Vitalie Spinu > Cc: emacs-helm/helm , emacs-helm/helm -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.135719533723354 (code B ref 13321); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:43:02 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2013 06:42:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40922 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqeVK-00064a-Id for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:42:16 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:36826) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqeVC-00064L-RY for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:42:12 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e12so7015736wge.22 for <13321@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:42:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=hHorMI1JA6mNb+7LmQ533/0wsr0bxK8b0cspcOHH8dE=; b=uVs/1tYG+DzhNXL33ik2I8EN+XjmOOr0lQ2HAykjswRwuIbMgs5+v37BQh5saZh4QJ zivE6PJJPaBRCqZUIznAKaV7rnBhXBlPiy+sc6JrZru6t7nMfHoPgMU9bSyH7IjOKLve Na6qYNYvx0eZKbqOxWDNqqVQqxKi/BPu+eY+l8GzGUbeBlCQEUAWfYefqtDZK4hqKi7n PKEP+Jj3ypHU8ViA2cq8nfHCS3PRWA3x6vMamS+ypLPspihMOPL05DaJDM3FahqAayk9 6xl0Uay0h8XYBpDGCtPYglwL7jljqBUzJGVINrH1L9w8I3STzKjWJI/1/bggycd9YlTQ B74Q== X-Received: by 10.180.95.228 with SMTP id dn4mr74234258wib.16.1357195326460; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:42:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell-14z (lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net. [78.243.104.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hg17sm88093953wib.1.2013.01.02.22.42.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:42:05 -0800 (PST) From: Thierry Volpiatto Organization: Emacs Helm References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:41:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:10:34 +0100") Message-ID: <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Thierry Volpiatto writes: > >> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> >>> Thierry Volpiatto writes: >>> >>>> When you receive a mail from somebody that report you a bug on github >>>> the "From" header is like this: >>>> >>>> From: Bob >>>> >>>> And then Gnus ask: >>>> Address `helm@noreply.github.com' might be bogus. Continue? (y or n) y >>> >>> And Then Gnus asks? Spontaneously? >> Yes, but not always and it does the same on emacs-24 branch without >> trying to send on . >> >>> Or do you use a command first? In which case, what command? > > You ... do something ... and then Gnus spontaneously starts asking you a > question about "helm@noreply.github.com"? > > That sounds very odd indeed. Gnus normally doesn't send email messages > without being told that it should do so. If you want you can submit a fake bug report here: https://github.com/emacs-helm/helm/issues?state=open And then we could try answering each other using Gnus. (I will switch to trunk to reproduce) Probably you should hit the bug too (Maybe use a Gmail address?) Note: I will not have the time today, I am outdoor. (maybe tonight or tomorrow). > Are you sure you're not using a command to send an email or something? > Like `f' or `r' or something? 1) I open and read mail 2) I hit "F" 3) Edit my reply ... 4) C-c C-c 5) Address `helm@noreply.github.com' might be bogus. Continue? (y or n) -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.135762695230275 (code B ref -1); Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:36:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2013 06:35:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56012 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TsSmq-0007sA-Nl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:35:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47188) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TsSmm-0007ru-Aa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:35:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsSma-0005bG-DC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:35:36 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:43852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsSma-0005bA-A3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:35:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58533) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsSmW-0000Qt-Fc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:35:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsSmR-0005aV-PY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:35:28 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsSmR-0005aK-Ik for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:35:23 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TsSmd-0001IU-6D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:35:35 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:35:35 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:35:35 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:35:07 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 58 Message-ID: <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OqliAmq6royonBKJvy0epojy1o8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Thierry Volpiatto writes: > Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> Thierry Volpiatto writes: >> >>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >>> >>>> Thierry Volpiatto writes: >>>> >>>>> When you receive a mail from somebody that report you a bug on github >>>>> the "From" header is like this: >>>>> >>>>> From: Bob >>>>> >>>>> And then Gnus ask: >>>>> Address `helm@noreply.github.com' might be bogus. Continue? (y or n) y >>>> >>>> And Then Gnus asks? Spontaneously? >>> Yes, but not always and it does the same on emacs-24 branch without >>> trying to send on . >>> >>>> Or do you use a command first? In which case, what command? >> >> You ... do something ... and then Gnus spontaneously starts asking you a >> question about "helm@noreply.github.com"? >> >> That sounds very odd indeed. Gnus normally doesn't send email messages >> without being told that it should do so. > If you want you can submit a fake bug report here: > https://github.com/emacs-helm/helm/issues?state=open > > And then we could try answering each other using Gnus. (I will switch to > trunk to reproduce) > Probably you should hit the bug too (Maybe use a Gmail address?) > > Note: I will not have the time today, I am outdoor. (maybe tonight or tomorrow). > >> Are you sure you're not using a command to send an email or something? >> Like `f' or `r' or something? > 1) I open and read mail > 2) I hit "F" > 3) Edit my reply ... > 4) C-c C-c > 5) Address `helm@noreply.github.com' might be bogus. Continue? (y or n) In the last reply I sent on github with emacs from trunk, it seems I was NOT asked for 5), could it be that Gnus ignore 'helm@noreply.github.com' and when ignoring this, a reply is sent to ? Also, I am sending my mails asynchronously (`smtpmail-send-it' is wrapped in a function that use another emacs to send), does something new happen (modification of headers) at this time ? -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 06:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136082380410864 (code B ref -1); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 06:37:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2013 06:36:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54941 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U5sQy-0002p4-OZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:36:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47517) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U5sQt-0002or-NX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:36:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5sQF-0004cQ-Uy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:36:00 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:58822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5sQF-0004cK-Rh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:35:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5sQB-00086z-AS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:35:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5sQ5-0004aZ-FR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:35:51 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53071) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5sQ5-0004aI-3h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:35:45 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U5sQM-00007l-Hi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:36:02 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:36:02 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:36:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:35:33 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 73 Message-ID: <87k3qbcsi2.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:nXaAU5pIeB2Tn4Fyf+zYeryDnBs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hi Lars, Thierry Volpiatto writes: > Thierry Volpiatto writes: > >> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> >>> Thierry Volpiatto writes: >>> >>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >>>> >>>>> Thierry Volpiatto writes: >>>>> >>>>>> When you receive a mail from somebody that report you a bug on github >>>>>> the "From" header is like this: >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Bob >>>>>> >>>>>> And then Gnus ask: >>>>>> Address `helm@noreply.github.com' might be bogus. Continue? (y or n) y >>>>> >>>>> And Then Gnus asks? Spontaneously? >>>> Yes, but not always and it does the same on emacs-24 branch without >>>> trying to send on . >>>> >>>>> Or do you use a command first? In which case, what command? >>> >>> You ... do something ... and then Gnus spontaneously starts asking you a >>> question about "helm@noreply.github.com"? >>> >>> That sounds very odd indeed. Gnus normally doesn't send email messages >>> without being told that it should do so. >> If you want you can submit a fake bug report here: >> https://github.com/emacs-helm/helm/issues?state=open >> >> And then we could try answering each other using Gnus. (I will switch to >> trunk to reproduce) >> Probably you should hit the bug too (Maybe use a Gmail address?) >> >> Note: I will not have the time today, I am outdoor. (maybe tonight or tomorrow). >> >>> Are you sure you're not using a command to send an email or something? >>> Like `f' or `r' or something? >> 1) I open and read mail >> 2) I hit "F" >> 3) Edit my reply ... >> 4) C-c C-c >> 5) Address `helm@noreply.github.com' might be bogus. Continue? (y or n) > > In the last reply I sent on github with emacs from trunk, it seems I was > NOT asked for 5), could it be that Gnus ignore 'helm@noreply.github.com' > and when ignoring this, a reply is sent to ? > > Also, I am sending my mails asynchronously (`smtpmail-send-it' is > wrapped in a function that use another emacs to send), does something > new happen (modification of headers) at this time ? I tried using "normally" `smtpmail-send-it', not the async function and get same error from gmail: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- X-Failed-Recipients: notifications@github.com Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <047d7ba979245cb55404d5a39fda@google.com> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 23:37:16 +0000 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So Gnus is still trying to send to "notifications@github.com". -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136146386521687 (code B ref -1); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:25:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2013 16:24:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42643 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8Ywa-0005dj-DD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:24:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36147) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8YwY-0005dc-0x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:24:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8YvG-0008WS-9m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:23:04 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:45908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8YvG-0008WH-6l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:23:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47469) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8Yv9-0001xu-KT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:23:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8Yv3-0008OL-Qb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:22:55 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8Yv3-0008Np-Jz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:22:49 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8YvK-0004eV-HR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:23:06 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:23:06 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:23:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:22:34 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 13 Message-ID: <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:EnXm+XET2i6l5VT3Zx/sdcttbvA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Hi Lars, Thierry Volpiatto writes: I have isolated the problem to message.el, so when I load the message.el of emacs-24 branch the problem disapear. I will try to (re)diff the file to found out what is wrong there. Perhaps you can have a look on your side too ? -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136146804728002 (code B ref -1); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:35:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2013 17:34:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8a23-0007Hb-Bt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:34:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59988) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8a1z-0007HS-Ii for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:34:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8a0d-0008HQ-O7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:32:45 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:51975) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8a0d-0008HM-Ku for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:32:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8ZOW-0008Re-P2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:53:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8ZOR-00018u-Lc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:53:16 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36266) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8ZOR-00018W-EJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:53:11 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8ZOj-00039c-0J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:53:29 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:53:28 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:53:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:53:00 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 33 Message-ID: <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3T3vKMuboA34cuxHjW8dfL9laDU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Hi Lars, Thierry Volpiatto writes: > Hi Lars, > > Thierry Volpiatto writes: > > I have isolated the problem to message.el, so when I load the message.el > of emacs-24 branch the problem disapear. > I will try to (re)diff the file to found out what is wrong there. > Perhaps you can have a look on your side too ? So the problem comes from `message-get-reply-headers', more exactly this piece of code: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ;; Make sure this message goes to the author if this is a wide ;; reply, since Reply-To address may be a list address a mailing ;; list server added. (when (and wide author) (setq cc (concat author ", " cc))) (when (or wide (not author)) (setq author (or (message-fetch-field "from") "")))) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- In our case the "from" field contain "notification@github.com" which is the place where we should never reply. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13614757307378 (code B ref -1); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:43:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2013 19:42:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42904 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8c1y-0001ux-8O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:42:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41152) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8c1w-0001uq-If for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:42:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8c0e-0004e9-Bj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:40:50 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:40588) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8c0e-0004di-2t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:40:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52497) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8c0b-0003QV-O2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:40:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8c0a-0004bm-D6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:40:45 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8c0a-0004bI-43 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:40:44 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8c0s-0002L4-0I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:41:02 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:41:01 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:41:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:40:32 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 59 Message-ID: <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:/d20lTJlPoQp3in9+VNpSLYiZa8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Thierry Volpiatto writes: > Hi Lars, > > Thierry Volpiatto writes: > >> Hi Lars, >> >> Thierry Volpiatto writes: >> >> I have isolated the problem to message.el, so when I load the message.el >> of emacs-24 branch the problem disapear. >> I will try to (re)diff the file to found out what is wrong there. >> Perhaps you can have a look on your side too ? > > So the problem comes from `message-get-reply-headers', more exactly this > piece of code: > > ;; Make sure this message goes to the author if this is a wide > ;; reply, since Reply-To address may be a list address a mailing > ;; list server added. > (when (and wide author) > (setq cc (concat author ", " cc))) > (when (or wide (not author)) > (setq author (or (message-fetch-field "from") "")))) > > In our case the "from" field contain "notification@github.com" which is > the place where we should never reply. Here the commit that introduce this bug: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 2559724 * | Author: Katsumi Yamaoka | Date: Mon Nov 19 06:24:03 2012 +0000 | | message.el (message-get-reply-headers): Make sure the reply goes to the author if it is a wide reply | | lisp/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ | lisp/message.el | 13 +++++++++---- | 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- With this change, here what is happening, sending a reply in same topic on github: ;; BAD emacs-24.3.50 ;; To: Le Wang ;; Cc: emacs-helm/helm , emacs-helm/helm ;; GOOD emacs-24.2.93 ;; To: emacs-helm/helm ;; Cc: emacs-helm/helm -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Thierry Volpiatto Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.136151744314769 (code B ref 13321); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:18:02 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2013 07:17:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43687 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8msh-0003q4-K7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:17:22 -0500 Received: from mail-hampton.hostforweb.net ([216.246.13.138]:46241 helo=hampton.hostforweb.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8msd-0003pv-Sz for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:17:18 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:58692 helo=localhost) by hampton.hostforweb.net with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U8mrI-001iKg-QZ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 01:15:53 -0600 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:15:50 +0900 Message-ID: From: Katsumi Yamaoka References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> Organization: Emacsen advocacy group X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`; Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu; B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (=?UTF-8?Q?=E7=9C=9F?= Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (i686-pc-cygwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3a12YVZ48gFg0YyQMo48jIH6nq4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - hampton.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: hampton.hostforweb.net: acl_c_authenticated_local_user: root X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Thierry Volpiatto wrote: > Here the commit that introduce this bug: > 2559724 * >| Author: Katsumi Yamaoka >| Date: Mon Nov 19 06:24:03 2012 +0000 >| >| message.el (message-get-reply-headers): Make sure the reply goes to the author if it is a wide reply This log message suggested that the author (i.e., the From: address) of a mail didn't appear in a message header when starting composing a wide reply. I mean, if you perform a wide reply using the `F' or the `S W' command to a mail like the following: From: the-author@example.com.invalid To: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid Cc: foo@example.com.invalid Reply-To: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid The old one will compose a draft as follows: To: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid Cc: foo@example.com.invalid But the present one does: To: the-author@example.com.invalid Cc: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid, foo@example.com.invalid This is much better for a wide reply, isn't it? The root cause of this difference is due to the Reply-To header, that some mailing list servers are likely to add (it may be because many mail clients compose a draft to send to only the author, I guess). Is your problem that the From address is invalid? If so, if there is a valid Reply-To header, you can use R rather than F. Otherwise, feel free to forward an example mail to me. Regards, From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Katsumi Yamaoka Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.136151852816284 (code B ref 13321); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2013 07:35:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nAE-0004EZ-BX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:35:27 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com ([74.125.82.178]:39312) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nAB-0004ER-1M for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:35:25 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x48so270346wey.37 for <13321@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:34:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=7KDIA8xBOvevW+GLXFsdbmq4C05NcvuSX+VQUVmGvjw=; b=VmWO+BCxp6rMcitaAq2CqVUijtcINvugI/hhmIf693MnElPvtjoMGwN3mnJXGPNtrG pnaNw05DI3CTtM0FLqWcnVrSuTCB1iGpfD3Ncfg+4NCfbst8R7MpHRyHU25jB/InnST8 Rl/RiDyF7PFGBzFh+BsbbCDo/7Beku9q4Qgq6G8AJBAXfzZjdGelv/oCiYXb9ahaERl+ gmyjEk07ldi65Wdu2BpXJ/87i2u6XwW3gSqRlY4pxGaIJTqff8XZdiW7Kna+qOgx8/o/ ualTB9liX7efNzSfjKtiDBYysw7Fm1rL3KUSEUaOIkbRROrUcCY42YdxP8hjZF6GMmkE 9HxQ== X-Received: by 10.180.8.4 with SMTP id n4mr1375858wia.13.1361518441202; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:34:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell-14z (lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net. [78.243.104.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dw1sm1829527wib.5.2013.02.21.23.33.59 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:33:59 -0800 (PST) From: Thierry Volpiatto Organization: Emacs Helm References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:33:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:15:50 +0900") Message-ID: <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Hi Katsumi, Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > Thierry Volpiatto wrote: >> Here the commit that introduce this bug: >> 2559724 * >>| Author: Katsumi Yamaoka >>| Date: Mon Nov 19 06:24:03 2012 +0000 >>| >>| message.el (message-get-reply-headers): Make sure the reply goes to the author if it is a wide reply > > This log message suggested that the author (i.e., the From: address) > of a mail didn't appear in a message header when starting composing > a wide reply. I mean, if you perform a wide reply using the `F' or > the `S W' command to a mail like the following: > > From: the-author@example.com.invalid > To: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid > Cc: foo@example.com.invalid > Reply-To: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid > > The old one will compose a draft as follows: > > To: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid > Cc: foo@example.com.invalid > > But the present one does: > > To: the-author@example.com.invalid > Cc: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid, foo@example.com.invalid > > This is much better for a wide reply, isn't it? The root cause of > this difference is due to the Reply-To header, that some mailing > list servers are likely to add (it may be because many mail clients > compose a draft to send to only the author, I guess). > > Is your problem that the From address is invalid? Yes. > If so, if there is a valid Reply-To header, you can use R rather than > F. Anyway even when hitting "F" this shouldn't happen. > Otherwise, feel free to forward an example mail to me. Will (re)send in next post. Here a patch that fix the problem, please review, I am not familiar with all these mails headers. Note that the second when clause is not needed when setting author before, and don't corrupt further the "to" header when wide is not used. Also my english is not very good, but I don't understand your comments, please fix it (I leave long lines to see better). Thanks. diff --git a/lisp/gnus/message.el b/lisp/gnus/message.el index 808e1ed..8b9df3c 100644 --- a/lisp/gnus/message.el +++ b/lisp/gnus/message.el @@ -6720,17 +6720,17 @@ The function is called with one parameter, a cons cell ..." ", ")) mct (message-fetch-field "mail-copies-to") author (or (message-fetch-field "mail-reply-to") - (message-fetch-field "reply-to")) + (message-fetch-field "reply-to") + (message-fetch-field "from") + "") mft (and message-use-mail-followup-to (message-fetch-field "mail-followup-to"))) ;; Make sure this message goes to the author if this is a wide - ;; reply, since Reply-To address may be a list address a mailing - ;; list server added. + ;; reply, FIXME: please fix the commented line following, it seem the second one is good and the first one wrong. + ;; since Reply-To address may be a list address a mailing list server added. + ;; since Reply-to adress may be a mailing list address with server added. (when (and wide author) - (setq cc (concat author ", " cc))) - (when (or wide (not author)) - (setq author (or (message-fetch-field "from") "")))) - + (setq cc (concat author ", " cc)))) ;; Handle special values of Mail-Copies-To. (when mct (cond ((or (equal (downcase mct) "never") -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136151911017213 (code B ref -1); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:46:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2013 07:45:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43698 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nJd-0004TX-7T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:45:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57239) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nJW-0004TM-NX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:45:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nI7-0005GB-1y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:43:41 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:59508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nI6-0005G5-Vn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:43:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40305) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nHz-00031x-S0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:43:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nHx-0005EI-It for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:43:27 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nHx-0005EB-CH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:43:25 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nIF-0001yT-TV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:43:43 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:43:43 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:43:43 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:43:13 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 63 Message-ID: <8738woiyjy.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:W3hMqu8lgf+2sICBjdhgKIsqpWk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > feel free to forward an example mail to me. This is my reply rejected, I will send the original mail in next post (the one I reply to) --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: notifications@github.com Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain github.com by aspmx.l.google.com. [173.194.65.27]. The error that the other server returned was: 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or 550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=6596 r7si54774070eeo.56 - gsmtp ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=QnkowhoNn3E1OVqXjQgJR202Dxb2qUbVOi7SbdlJg7c=; b=FUvLhze0DYaug4h9gwGh68s6uVH5HZHtiD1eN+oIdmLlKxrqs2WsACAc52p6yx+3/C B2mGeWWuI55F4OS/E2AqskKhlmjR8CI8aArB9juHv2V2Eus4DclgIaPyzL2fQ8d4L8WG JTIn3A2aY7+LEM4P69e5SoH6juoeWnL5HYxnT/Tvt6UOCrURBxZKd+QkIn0xpBC3bmce lTLxfOrnBE7uAlvAMbS7exIaZ/wsHLAFEC4BBnx6wtB8LDia9eyc0xfbKi1YaYiPl/8p W5MAGC1YjCVFrJCjQAHMWP1KacPIUVwjQ2i64ECDXDOFATyijJNDJWyGwi3bDB93jpEA ZPjA== X-Received: by 10.14.218.71 with SMTP id j47mr81954311eep.28.1361464821499; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:40:21 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from dell-14z (lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net. [...]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a1sm90649428eep.2.2013.02.21.08.40.19 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:40:20 -0800 (PST) From: Thierry Volpiatto To: Le Wang Cc: emacs-helm/helm , emacs-helm/helm Subject: Re: [helm] install project oriented file selector sub-project (#75) Organization: Emacs Helm References: Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:40:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Le Wang's message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:20:10 -0800") Message-ID: <87fw0pr572.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Gnus test please ignore, I will possibly send 4 or 5 more messages like this ignore them, sorry for inconvenience. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136151963017912 (code B ref -1); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:54:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2013 07:53:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43703 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nS0-0004ep-Of for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:53:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59651) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nRx-0004eh-GN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:53:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nQc-0007rb-Id for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:52:24 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:33089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nQc-0007rT-7M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:52:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42647) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nQL-00048o-D0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:52:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nQE-0007kA-VI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:52:05 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nQE-0007k1-Pd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:51:58 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nQU-0008L5-34 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:52:14 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:52:14 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:52:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:51:42 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 46 Message-ID: <87y5eghjld.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OsbJzV9XFkLQJVxvLldDoYFoU+s= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > feel free to forward an example mail to me. And this is the original where I reply to: So the "Reply-To" should take precedence on the "from" header and goes in the "to" header when replying, when "wide" is used "from" is added anyway to "cc". --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Delivered-To: thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com Received: by 10.227.197.78 with SMTP id ej14csp14052wbb; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:20:13 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.52.27.138 with SMTP id t10mr27289568vdg.59.1361456412613; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:20:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from smtp1-ext.rs.github.com (smtp1-ext.rs.github.com. [207.97.227.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cu8si28670005vdc.66.2013.02.21.06.20.11; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:20:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of noreply@github.com designates 207.97.227.250 as permitted sender) client-ip=207.97.227.250; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of noreply@github.com designates 207.97.227.250 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=noreply@github.com Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:20:10 -0800 From: Le Wang Reply-To: emacs-helm/helm To: emacs-helm/helm Cc: Thierry Volpiatto Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [helm] install project oriented file selector sub-project (#75) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_51262d1ad0666_5f80715ed087131"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Recipient: thierryvolpiatto X-GitHub-Reason: mention List-ID: emacs-helm/helm List-Archive: https://github.com/emacs-helm/helm List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: , X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136151978118134 (code B ref -1); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:57:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2013 07:56:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43708 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nUS-0004iQ-E8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:56:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60187) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nUQ-0004iG-27 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:56:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nT5-0008Vs-Gb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:54:57 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:34640) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nT5-0008Vl-Dx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:54:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43296) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nT3-0005WQ-1a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:54:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nSw-0008Th-HI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:54:52 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nSw-0008Tb-Ab for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:54:46 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nTE-000254-OH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:55:04 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:55:04 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:55:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:53:59 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 21 Message-ID: <87txp4hjhk.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gyiZvNyh8F4IkXDqK+8K/4BKzXo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > Thierry Volpiatto wrote: >> Here the commit that introduce this bug: >> 2559724 * >>| Author: Katsumi Yamaoka >>| Date: Mon Nov 19 06:24:03 2012 +0000 >>| >>| message.el (message-get-reply-headers): Make sure the reply goes to the author if it is a wide reply > > This log message suggested that the author (i.e., the From: address) > of a mail didn't appear in a message header when starting composing > a wide reply. I mean, if you perform a wide reply using the `F' or > the `S W' command to a mail like the following: It is failing also when replying with `R' because your second when clause which is wrong. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Thierry Volpiatto Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.136152576326674 (code B ref 13321); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:37:01 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2013 09:36:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43746 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8p2x-0006wA-Fb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:36:03 -0500 Received: from mail-hampton.hostforweb.net ([216.246.13.138]:43081 helo=hampton.hostforweb.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8p2v-0006vm-6d for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:36:02 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:59738 helo=localhost) by hampton.hostforweb.net with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U8p1a-004M76-9A; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:34:38 -0600 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:34:34 +0900 Message-ID: From: Katsumi Yamaoka References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> Organization: Emacsen advocacy group X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`; Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu; B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (=?UTF-8?Q?=E7=9C=9F?= Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (i686-pc-cygwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ag3VRXvRvAPXQSirWVcJMyqgTZk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - hampton.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: hampton.hostforweb.net: acl_c_authenticated_local_user: root X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com wrote: > Katsumi Yamaoka writes: [...] >> I mean, if you perform a wide reply using the `F' or >> the `S W' command to a mail like the following: >> >> From: the-author@example.com.invalid >> To: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid >> Cc: foo@example.com.invalid >> Reply-To: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid >> >> The old one will compose a draft as follows: >> >> To: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid >> Cc: foo@example.com.invalid >> >> But the present one does: >> >> To: the-author@example.com.invalid >> Cc: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid, foo@example.com.invalid >> >> This is much better for a wide reply, isn't it? [...] >> Is your problem that the From address is invalid? > Yes. >> If so, if there is a valid Reply-To header, you can use R rather than >> F. > Anyway even when hitting "F" this shouldn't happen. Please let me say that a wide reply doesn't contain the author of an original mail in the recipient list is a bug. To exclude an invalid address from a wide reply is not a feature; that is a rare exception that the poison is efficacious. Please imagine, a wide reply to your mail doesn't go to you only: (You send a mail) From: Thierry Volpiatto To: emacs-devel Cc: Lars Reply-To: emacs-devel (I reply to your mail) -> From: Katsumi Yamaoka To: emacs-devel Cc: Lars Reply-To: emacs-devel (You reply to my reply that you happen to find in Gmane) -> From: Thierry Volpiatto To: emacs-devel Cc: Lars Reply-To: emacs-devel (I don't notice it) Though the emacs-devel list doesn't add Reply-To, not a few lists do it. I don't think that GitHub doesn't use a valid address in the From header is a bad manner. But it should have a valid Reply-To if it allows a mail reply, or should have something like a link to a web form. >> Otherwise, feel free to forward an example mail to me. > Will (re)send in next post. Have you sent it already? If so, it may be delayed or... Anyway I don't need it now, maybe. > Here a patch that fix the problem, please review, I am not familiar with > all these mails headers. Unfortunately it's a regression. :( > Note that the second when clause is not needed when setting author > before, and don't corrupt further the "to" header when wide is not used. > Also my english is not very good, but I don't understand your comments, > please fix it (I leave long lines to see better). Sorry for my further poor English. [...] > - ;; [...]since Reply-To address may be a list address a mailing > - ;; list server added. I omitted a relative pronoun in front of "a mailing list server". Though I don't know whether it is barbarous, it is taught in Japan's school. ;-p Regards, From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Katsumi Yamaoka Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.136152769929526 (code B ref 13321); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2013 10:08:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43759 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8pYA-0007gA-F0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:08:19 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:41271) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8pY6-0007fy-Di for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:08:16 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hn17so689216wib.4 for <13321@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:06:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=G2calyJWEVu8yAFpYYKRoffyd9/ZIR2W01k2fd+/4ts=; b=QLZKvrz030vNhm8cyoegz4UEJrlwqmIvHmybfJ9aiaE4CpdcFosHjldMj4Z+Wm5/wK FAACX+03Vojns4CHqVQtKRi0KJEcl3q+qLReQigosbxwsebLgXg+YqZFd05f7wtUsuTd KunkpBerRoGCvz79Y1TLkF8uJzpRT0OgAJiRCH+kEGgwvEwY2c5mhjKAvvKWdwOOTPCj enpOWvJu6lyA6brlFWJFtsvszVhLdq4QDu0IDNbD6Ku12CHi7PDEBp68QsOwKWjRhBrW TxCvwB2U9x3zlG6iry5D1AzEFmOrNy6+lmthY1cSHXH20EMjKjUX2HJ1OMxgC8q3SemF qAmw== X-Received: by 10.180.94.135 with SMTP id dc7mr37709505wib.11.1361527611494; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:06:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell-14z (lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net. [78.243.104.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cf8sm2574597wib.1.2013.02.22.02.06.49 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:06:50 -0800 (PST) From: Thierry Volpiatto Organization: Emacs Helm References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:06:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:34:34 +0900") Message-ID: <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Hi Katsumi, Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > Please let me say that a wide reply doesn't contain the author > of an original mail in the recipient list is a bug. To exclude > an invalid address from a wide reply is not a feature; It is not excluded in the patch, it is added to "cc" only if "wide" is specified. > that is a rare exception that the poison is efficacious. Please > imagine, a wide reply to your mail doesn't go to you only: > > (You send a mail) > > From: Thierry Volpiatto > To: emacs-devel > Cc: Lars > Reply-To: emacs-devel > > (I reply to your mail) > > -> From: Katsumi Yamaoka > To: emacs-devel > Cc: Lars > Reply-To: emacs-devel > > (You reply to my reply that you happen to find in Gmane) > > -> From: Thierry Volpiatto > To: emacs-devel > Cc: Lars > Reply-To: emacs-devel > > (I don't notice it) Please have a look at the mail examples I sent in other posts. > Though the emacs-devel list doesn't add Reply-To, not a few lists > do it. I don't think that GitHub doesn't use a valid address in > the From header is a bad manner. But it should have a valid > Reply-To if it allows a mail reply, It have a valid "Reply-To" and with the patch I sent it is used instead of "from". > or should have something like a link to a web form. > >>> Otherwise, feel free to forward an example mail to me. >> Will (re)send in next post. > > Have you sent it already? If so, it may be delayed or... > Anyway I don't need it now, maybe. > >> Here a patch that fix the problem, please review, I am not familiar with >> all these mails headers. > > Unfortunately it's a regression. :( Don't know, but it is better than receiving warning mails from gmail like this: From: Mail Delivery Subsystem Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Which is not an improvement IMO. Note that with the current state it is impossible to reply with Gnus on github with `R' `F' or whatever without beeing rejected; The patch I sent fix this. The point is that with the patch I sent + the headers of the rejected mail and the original mail where I reply to, you will be able to understand what happen and fix it. Thanks. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.13615319613139 (code B ref 13321); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:20:02 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2013 11:19:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43819 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8qeu-0000oY-01 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:19:21 -0500 Received: from mail-hampton.hostforweb.net ([216.246.13.138]:47332 helo=hampton.hostforweb.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8qeq-0000oQ-GB for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:19:18 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:36480 helo=localhost) by hampton.hostforweb.net with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U8qdV-001oix-9h; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:17:53 -0600 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:17:49 +0900 Message-ID: From: Katsumi Yamaoka References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> Organization: Emacsen advocacy group X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`; Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu; B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (=?UTF-8?Q?=E7=9C=9F?= Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (i686-pc-cygwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zq0EEfcrpeQkqGXMPuMalVw/RwA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - hampton.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: hampton.hostforweb.net: acl_c_authenticated_local_user: root X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) --=-=-= thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com wrote: > Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >> Please let me say that a wide reply doesn't contain the author >> of an original mail in the recipient list is a bug. To exclude >> an invalid address from a wide reply is not a feature; > It is not excluded in the patch, it is added to "cc" only if "wide" is > specified. [...] > Please have a look at the mail examples I sent in other posts. Hm, I haven't gotten it yet. Could you try replying to a mail attached in this message as well (copy it to a mail group and do F)? [...] > The point is that with the patch I sent + the headers of the rejected > mail and the original mail where I reply to, you will be able to > understand what happen and fix it. Ok, I'll surely try it. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/octet-stream Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 TWVzc2FnZS1JRDogPDg3MXVjOG5icTEuZnNmQHRvdGFsbHktZnVkZ2VkLW91dC1tZXNzYWdlLWlk PgpUbzogdGhlLW1haWxpbmctbGlzdEBleGFtcGxlLmNvbS5pbnZhbGlkCkNjOiBmb29AZXhhbXBs ZS5jb20uaW52YWxpZApTdWJqZWN0OiB0ZXN0ClJlcGx5LVRvOiB0aGUtbWFpbGluZy1saXN0QGV4 YW1wbGUuY29tLmludmFsaWQKRnJvbTogdGhlLWF1dGhvckBleGFtcGxlLmNvbS5pbnZhbGlkCkRh dGU6IEZyaSwgMjIgRmViIDIwMTMgMTM6MDc6MzQgKzA5MDAKCnRlc3QuCg== --=-=-=-- From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136154230122046 (code B ref -1); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:12:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2013 14:11:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43944 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8tLf-0005jT-FM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:11:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50038) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8tLb-0005jK-Dj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:11:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8tKC-0000ok-8x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:10:12 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:60153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8tKC-0000of-6Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:10:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8tK2-0004CQ-9t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:10:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8tJw-0000YB-EJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:09:58 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8tJw-0000Xa-6X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:09:52 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8tK6-00081z-By for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:10:02 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:10:02 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:10:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:09:31 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 41 Message-ID: <878v6g5tk4.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ROVcGzl466Z9vy7udTOZb/0EFH0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Hi Katsumi, Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com wrote: >> Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >>> Please let me say that a wide reply doesn't contain the author >>> of an original mail in the recipient list is a bug. To exclude >>> an invalid address from a wide reply is not a feature; > >> It is not excluded in the patch, it is added to "cc" only if "wide" is >> specified. > [...] >> Please have a look at the mail examples I sent in other posts. > > Hm, I haven't gotten it yet. I see them on Gmane: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2013-02/msg01077.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2013-02/msg01078.html > Could you try replying to a mail attached in this message as well > (copy it to a mail group and do F)? I have no mail group to copy to, but with the links above you should see clearly the problem. > [...] >> The point is that with the patch I sent + the headers of the rejected >> mail and the original mail where I reply to, you will be able to >> understand what happen and fix it. > > Ok, I'll surely try it. Thanks. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 06:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136160269627840 (code B ref -1); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 06:59:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2013 06:58:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45038 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U993l-0007Et-SF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:58:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43920) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U993h-0007Ei-EK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:58:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U992G-0006HW-G5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:56:42 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:32850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U992G-0006HQ-Dc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:56:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55262) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9928-00018K-Rf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:56:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9920-0006FU-HG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:56:32 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45899) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9920-0006FG-AS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:56:24 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U992G-0004Su-08 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 07:56:40 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 07:56:39 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 07:56:39 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 07:56:04 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 43 Message-ID: <87sj4nfri3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:MaRopZKWkBoWYU6toYR+yR1IoxI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com wrote: >> Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >>> Please let me say that a wide reply doesn't contain the author >>> of an original mail in the recipient list is a bug. To exclude >>> an invalid address from a wide reply is not a feature; > >> It is not excluded in the patch, it is added to "cc" only if "wide" is >> specified. > [...] >> Please have a look at the mail examples I sent in other posts. > > Hm, I haven't gotten it yet. Could you try replying to a mail > attached in this message as well (copy it to a mail group and do > F)? > > [...] >> The point is that with the patch I sent + the headers of the rejected >> mail and the original mail where I reply to, you will be able to >> understand what happen and fix it. > > Ok, I'll surely try it. Also on a side note, this change can be done also in this same function: - (if to (setq recipients (concat recipients ", " to))) - (if cc (setq recipients (concat recipients ", " cc))) - (if extra (setq recipients (concat recipients ", " extra))) - (if mct (setq recipients (concat recipients ", " mct))))) - (if (>= (length recipients) 2) - ;; Strip the leading ", ". - (setq recipients (substring recipients 2))) + (loop for h in `(,to ,cc ,extra ,mct) + for recip = (and recipients (not (string= recipients ""))) + when h do (setq recipients (concat recipients (and recip ", ") h))))) And also in first loop in beginning of function `thereis' can be used. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 08:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13616076472498 (code B ref -1); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 08:21:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2013 08:20:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9ALd-0000eE-TL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:20:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59654) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9ALa-0000e5-Bl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:20:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9AK6-0000jC-2m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:19:15 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:45811) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9AK5-0000j6-Vp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:19:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42779) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9AK3-0005Cz-Lw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:19:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9AK1-0000hA-B2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:19:07 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9AK1-0000h5-4c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:19:05 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9AKK-0000Zc-6D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:19:24 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:19:24 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:19:24 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:18:54 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 47 Message-ID: <87hal35tox.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:oMgB+PG2WTlp6UWU/VTYUFg1Onw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com wrote: >> Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >>> Please let me say that a wide reply doesn't contain the author >>> of an original mail in the recipient list is a bug. To exclude >>> an invalid address from a wide reply is not a feature; > >> It is not excluded in the patch, it is added to "cc" only if "wide" is >> specified. > [...] >> Please have a look at the mail examples I sent in other posts. > > Hm, I haven't gotten it yet. Could you try replying to a mail > attached in this message as well (copy it to a mail group and do > F)? > > [...] >> The point is that with the patch I sent + the headers of the rejected >> mail and the original mail where I reply to, you will be able to >> understand what happen and fix it. > > Ok, I'll surely try it. And you can probaly get rid of this while loop too by removing duplicates in first place: - (message-tokenize-header recipients))) - ;; Remove all duplicates. - (let ((s recipients)) - (while s - (let ((address (car (pop s)))) - (while (assoc address s) - (setq recipients (delq (assoc address s) recipients) - s (delq (assoc address s) s)))))) + ;; Remove all duplicates. + (loop with recip for mess in (message-tokenize-header recipients) + unless (member mess recip) collect mess into recip + finally return recip))) NOTE: `remove-duplicates' can't be used because you require cl at compile time only. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136161410611612 (code B ref -1); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:09:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2013 10:08:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45106 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9C1p-00031F-Og for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:08:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52301) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9C1l-000316-Lf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:08:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9C0G-0001is-BE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:06:54 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:39671) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9C0G-0001io-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:06:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9C0E-0007tj-FH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:06:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9C03-0001hS-5R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:06:46 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9C02-0001hO-VE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:06:35 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9C0J-0000WY-63 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:06:51 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:06:51 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:06:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:06:19 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 70 Message-ID: <87d2vr5opw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> <87hal35tox.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cOZ5o/HfqvB/JxSvrqOqQojc3l4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Thierry Volpiatto writes: > Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > >> thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com wrote: >>> Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >>>> Please let me say that a wide reply doesn't contain the author >>>> of an original mail in the recipient list is a bug. To exclude >>>> an invalid address from a wide reply is not a feature; >> >>> It is not excluded in the patch, it is added to "cc" only if "wide" is >>> specified. >> [...] >>> Please have a look at the mail examples I sent in other posts. >> >> Hm, I haven't gotten it yet. Could you try replying to a mail >> attached in this message as well (copy it to a mail group and do >> F)? >> >> [...] >>> The point is that with the patch I sent + the headers of the rejected >>> mail and the original mail where I reply to, you will be able to >>> understand what happen and fix it. >> >> Ok, I'll surely try it. > > And you can probaly get rid of this while loop too by removing > duplicates in first place: > > - (message-tokenize-header recipients))) > - ;; Remove all duplicates. > - (let ((s recipients)) > - (while s > - (let ((address (car (pop s)))) > - (while (assoc address s) > - (setq recipients (delq (assoc address s) recipients) > - s (delq (assoc address s) s)))))) > + ;; Remove all duplicates. > + (loop with recip for mess in (message-tokenize-header recipients) > + unless (member mess recip) collect mess into recip > + finally return recip))) > > NOTE: `remove-duplicates' can't be used because you require cl at compile > time only. And while we are at it this one also can be simpler: - (let ((plain-addrs (mapcar 'car recipients)) - subaddrs recip) - (while plain-addrs - (setq subaddrs (assoc (car plain-addrs) - message-hierarchical-addresses) - plain-addrs (cdr plain-addrs)) - (when subaddrs - (setq subaddrs (cdr subaddrs)) - (while subaddrs - (setq recip (assoc (car subaddrs) recipients) - subaddrs (cdr subaddrs)) - (if recip - (setq recipients (delq recip recipients)))))))) + (setq recipients + (loop for (r . a) in recipients + for assoc = (cdr (assoc r message-hierarchical-addresses)) + when assoc append assoc into recip + unless (member r recip) collect (cons r a) into results + finally return (cdr results)))) -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136161666515206 (code B ref -1); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:52:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2013 10:51:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9Ch6-0003xD-CY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:51:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58235) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9Ch2-0003wm-2Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:51:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9CfW-0000cG-Kq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:49:32 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:48524) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9CfW-0000cC-IH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:49:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9CfQ-0006Zj-S7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:49:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9CfK-0000a4-2q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:49:20 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9CfJ-0000Zv-PP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:49:14 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9CRu-0004XO-SM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:35:22 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:35:22 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:35:22 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:34:50 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 126 Message-ID: <878v6f5ned.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ol7Y+fazAp8Zj0Jvbj0eL+jLQYs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Hi Katsumi, Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com wrote: >> Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >>> Please let me say that a wide reply doesn't contain the author >>> of an original mail in the recipient list is a bug. To exclude >>> an invalid address from a wide reply is not a feature; > >> It is not excluded in the patch, it is added to "cc" only if "wide" is >> specified. > [...] >> Please have a look at the mail examples I sent in other posts. > > Hm, I haven't gotten it yet. Could you try replying to a mail > attached in this message as well (copy it to a mail group and do > F)? > > [...] >> The point is that with the patch I sent + the headers of the rejected >> mail and the original mail where I reply to, you will be able to >> understand what happen and fix it. > > Ok, I'll surely try it. Here the whole patch: diff --git a/lisp/message.el b/lisp/message.el index 21847ac..d92c9ae 100644 --- a/lisp/message.el +++ b/lisp/message.el @@ -6753,8 +6753,7 @@ The function is called with one parameter, a cons cell ..." ;; message-header-synonyms. (setq to (or (message-fetch-field "to") (and (loop for synonym in message-header-synonyms - when (memq 'Original-To synonym) - return t) + thereis (memq 'Original-To synonym)) (message-fetch-field "original-to"))) cc (message-fetch-field "cc") extra (when message-extra-wide-headers @@ -6764,16 +6763,15 @@ The function is called with one parameter, a cons cell ..." ", ")) mct (message-fetch-field "mail-copies-to") author (or (message-fetch-field "mail-reply-to") - (message-fetch-field "reply-to")) + (message-fetch-field "reply-to") + (message-fetch-field "from") "") mft (and message-use-mail-followup-to (message-fetch-field "mail-followup-to"))) ;; Make sure this message goes to the author if this is a wide ;; reply, since Reply-To address may be a list address a mailing ;; list server added. (when (and wide author) - (setq cc (concat author ", " cc))) - (when (or wide (not author)) - (setq author (or (message-fetch-field "from") "")))) + (setq cc (concat author ", " cc)))) ;; Handle special values of Mail-Copies-To. (when mct @@ -6829,13 +6827,9 @@ want to get rid of this query permanently."))) (setq recipients (concat ", " mft))) (t (setq recipients (if never-mct "" (concat ", " author))) - (if to (setq recipients (concat recipients ", " to))) - (if cc (setq recipients (concat recipients ", " cc))) - (if extra (setq recipients (concat recipients ", " extra))) - (if mct (setq recipients (concat recipients ", " mct))))) - (if (>= (length recipients) 2) - ;; Strip the leading ", ". - (setq recipients (substring recipients 2))) + (loop for h in `(,to ,cc ,extra ,mct) + for recip = (and recipients (not (string= recipients ""))) + when h do (setq recipients (concat recipients (and recip ", ") h))))) ;; Squeeze whitespace. (while (string-match "[ \t][ \t]+" recipients) (setq recipients (replace-match " " t t recipients))) @@ -6854,31 +6848,20 @@ want to get rid of this query permanently."))) (cons (downcase (mail-strip-quoted-names addr)) addr)) (cons (downcase (mail-strip-quoted-names addr)) addr))) - (message-tokenize-header recipients))) - ;; Remove all duplicates. - (let ((s recipients)) - (while s - (let ((address (car (pop s)))) - (while (assoc address s) - (setq recipients (delq (assoc address s) recipients) - s (delq (assoc address s) s)))))) + ;; Remove all duplicates. + (loop with recip for mess in (message-tokenize-header recipients) + unless (member mess recip) collect mess into recip + finally return recip))) ;; Remove hierarchical lists that are contained within each other, ;; if message-hierarchical-addresses is defined. (when message-hierarchical-addresses - (let ((plain-addrs (mapcar 'car recipients)) - subaddrs recip) - (while plain-addrs - (setq subaddrs (assoc (car plain-addrs) - message-hierarchical-addresses) - plain-addrs (cdr plain-addrs)) - (when subaddrs - (setq subaddrs (cdr subaddrs)) - (while subaddrs - (setq recip (assoc (car subaddrs) recipients) - subaddrs (cdr subaddrs)) - (if recip - (setq recipients (delq recip recipients)))))))) + (setq recipients + (loop for (r . a) in recipients + for assoc = (cdr (assoc r message-hierarchical-addresses)) + when assoc append assoc into recip + unless (or (member r recip) (assoc r results)) + collect (cons r a) into results finally return results))) (setq recipients (message-prune-recipients recipients)) -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 06:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13616887325687 (code B ref -1); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 06:53:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2013 06:52:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46442 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9VRP-0001Tc-Ok for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:52:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53772) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9VRK-0001TR-VG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:52:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9VPk-0005Sy-IK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:50:31 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:50284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9VPk-0005Sr-E4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:50:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9VPd-0004ZJ-Kk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:50:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9VPa-0005Nv-A7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:50:17 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9VPZ-0005NM-L0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:50:14 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9VPq-0005MO-Tk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 07:50:30 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 07:50:30 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 07:50:30 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 07:49:56 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 178 Message-ID: <87sj4m8auj.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2lO7lXCBZf83qSzPlpAqQ335ZGk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com wrote: >> Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >>> Please let me say that a wide reply doesn't contain the author >>> of an original mail in the recipient list is a bug. To exclude >>> an invalid address from a wide reply is not a feature; > >> It is not excluded in the patch, it is added to "cc" only if "wide" is >> specified. > [...] >> Please have a look at the mail examples I sent in other posts. > > Hm, I haven't gotten it yet. Could you try replying to a mail > attached in this message as well (copy it to a mail group and do > F)? > > [...] >> The point is that with the patch I sent + the headers of the rejected >> mail and the original mail where I reply to, you will be able to >> understand what happen and fix it. > > Ok, I'll surely try it. To summarize the problem here some more example, with also the patch modified to fix previous errors when removing duplicates. Note that the changes applied further in the patch are not related with this bug, they just try to improve the code. Note also that one loop is removing extra spaces (I have noticed that in some mails, addresses are separated with two spaces in "CC"). ,----[ Replying on github ] | A "reply-to" header exists: | | From: Le Wang | Reply-To: emacs-helm/helm | To: emacs-helm/helm | | I send a reply with my patch applied: | | From: Thierry Volpiatto | To: emacs-helm/helm | Cc: emacs-helm/helm | | I send a reply with actual code (bug) | | From: Thierry Volpiatto | To: Le Wang | Cc: emacs-helm/helm , emacs-helm/helm `---- ,----[ Replying on emacs.dev ] | No "reply-to" header: | | From: Katsumi Yamaoka | To: thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com | Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org | | I send a reply with my patch applied: | | From: Thierry Volpiatto | To: Katsumi Yamaoka | Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org | | With original code it is the same (no bug in this case) | | From: Thierry Volpiatto | To: Katsumi Yamaoka | Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org `---- And here the last version of patch: diff --git a/lisp/message.el b/lisp/message.el index 21847ac..44f1ee4 100644 --- a/lisp/message.el +++ b/lisp/message.el @@ -6753,8 +6753,7 @@ The function is called with one parameter, a cons cell ..." ;; message-header-synonyms. (setq to (or (message-fetch-field "to") (and (loop for synonym in message-header-synonyms - when (memq 'Original-To synonym) - return t) + thereis (memq 'Original-To synonym)) (message-fetch-field "original-to"))) cc (message-fetch-field "cc") extra (when message-extra-wide-headers @@ -6764,16 +6763,19 @@ The function is called with one parameter, a cons cell ..." ", ")) mct (message-fetch-field "mail-copies-to") author (or (message-fetch-field "mail-reply-to") - (message-fetch-field "reply-to")) + (message-fetch-field "reply-to") + (message-fetch-field "from") "") mft (and message-use-mail-followup-to (message-fetch-field "mail-followup-to"))) - ;; Make sure this message goes to the author if this is a wide - ;; reply, since Reply-To address may be a list address a mailing - ;; list server added. + ;; Make sure this message goes to the author if this is a wide reply. + ;; If a '*reply-to' header is found use it, otherwise use the 'from' + ;; header and add it to 'cc'. + ;; If "wide" is not specified, "author" will end later in "to" header. + ;; We should not force using "from" for "author" when not using "wide" + ;; because it will go in this case in "to" and in some cases the address + ;; from "from" is invalid like on github (bug#13321). (when (and wide author) - (setq cc (concat author ", " cc))) - (when (or wide (not author)) - (setq author (or (message-fetch-field "from") "")))) + (setq cc (concat author ", " cc)))) ;; Handle special values of Mail-Copies-To. (when mct @@ -6829,13 +6831,9 @@ want to get rid of this query permanently."))) (setq recipients (concat ", " mft))) (t (setq recipients (if never-mct "" (concat ", " author))) - (if to (setq recipients (concat recipients ", " to))) - (if cc (setq recipients (concat recipients ", " cc))) - (if extra (setq recipients (concat recipients ", " extra))) - (if mct (setq recipients (concat recipients ", " mct))))) - (if (>= (length recipients) 2) - ;; Strip the leading ", ". - (setq recipients (substring recipients 2))) + (loop for h in `(,to ,cc ,extra ,mct) + for recip = (and recipients (not (string= recipients ""))) + when h do (setq recipients (concat recipients (and recip ", ") h))))) ;; Squeeze whitespace. (while (string-match "[ \t][ \t]+" recipients) (setq recipients (replace-match " " t t recipients))) @@ -6854,31 +6852,21 @@ want to get rid of this query permanently."))) (cons (downcase (mail-strip-quoted-names addr)) addr)) (cons (downcase (mail-strip-quoted-names addr)) addr))) - (message-tokenize-header recipients))) - ;; Remove all duplicates. - (let ((s recipients)) - (while s - (let ((address (car (pop s)))) - (while (assoc address s) - (setq recipients (delq (assoc address s) recipients) - s (delq (assoc address s) s)))))) + ;; Remove all duplicates. + (loop with recip for m in (message-tokenize-header recipients) + for mess = (replace-regexp-in-string "^ " "" m) + unless (member mess recip) collect mess into recip + finally return recip))) ;; Remove hierarchical lists that are contained within each other, ;; if message-hierarchical-addresses is defined. (when message-hierarchical-addresses - (let ((plain-addrs (mapcar 'car recipients)) - subaddrs recip) - (while plain-addrs - (setq subaddrs (assoc (car plain-addrs) - message-hierarchical-addresses) - plain-addrs (cdr plain-addrs)) - (when subaddrs - (setq subaddrs (cdr subaddrs)) - (while subaddrs - (setq recip (assoc (car subaddrs) recipients) - subaddrs (cdr subaddrs)) - (if recip - (setq recipients (delq recip recipients)))))))) + (setq recipients + (loop for (r . a) in recipients + for assoc = (cdr (assoc r message-hierarchical-addresses)) + when assoc append assoc into recip + unless (or (member r recip) (assoc r results)) + collect (cons r a) into results finally return results))) (setq recipients (message-prune-recipients recipients)) -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.136177570326775 (code B ref 13321); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:02:01 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2013 07:01:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48739 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9s46-0006xg-VK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:01:38 -0500 Received: from mail-hampton.hostforweb.net ([216.246.13.138]:46217 helo=hampton.hostforweb.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9s43-0006xV-OK for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:01:32 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:59692 helo=localhost) by hampton.hostforweb.net with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U9s2R-001NLu-Ol for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:59:52 -0600 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:59:46 +0900 Message-ID: From: Katsumi Yamaoka References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj4m8auj.fsf@gmail.com> Organization: Emacsen advocacy group X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`; Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu; B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (=?UTF-8?Q?=E7=9C=9F?= Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (i686-pc-cygwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y84vhycEXby/kTzqMrcuIsvfCsA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - hampton.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: hampton.hostforweb.net: acl_c_authenticated_local_user: root X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Thierry Volpiatto wrote: > Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >> Ok, I'll surely try it. I tried the last patch. [...] > ,----[ Replying on github ] >| A "reply-to" header exists: >| >| From: Le Wang >| Reply-To: emacs-helm/helm >| >| To: emacs-helm/helm >| >| I send a reply with my patch applied: >| >| From: Thierry Volpiatto >| To: emacs-helm/helm >| >| Cc: emacs-helm/helm Why this /wide reply/ doesn't go to "Le Wang"? Even if Le Wang is a subscriber, a regular visitor, or a staff of the Emacs Helm list, don't we usually include the author of an original mail in the recipients list if it is a wide reply? Otherwise if Le Wang's address is invalid and you want Gnus to exclude it from the recipients list, you can use the user option `message-dont-reply-to-names'. >| I send a reply with actual code (bug) >| >| From: Thierry Volpiatto >| To: Le Wang >| Cc: emacs-helm/helm , emacs-helm/helm >| > `---- Is it ok that both the cases contain ? You can omit it as well using `message-dont-reply-to-names' (if you want). From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.136177624227533 (code B ref 13321); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:11:01 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2013 07:10:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48748 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sCw-0007A2-5w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:10:42 -0500 Received: from mail-hampton.hostforweb.net ([216.246.13.138]:60701 helo=hampton.hostforweb.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sCs-00079t-BV for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:10:39 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:34631 helo=localhost) by hampton.hostforweb.net with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sBG-001Z6k-Jj for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 01:08:59 -0600 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:08:54 +0900 Message-ID: From: Katsumi Yamaoka References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj4m8auj.fsf@gmail.com> Organization: Emacsen advocacy group X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`; Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu; B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (=?UTF-8?Q?=E7=9C=9F?= Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (i686-pc-cygwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0pGHNCsGeOfsHf5L7jKHO5hC7JE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - hampton.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: hampton.hostforweb.net: acl_c_authenticated_local_user: yamaoka X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Katsumi Yamaoka wrote: > you can use the user option `message-dont-reply-to-names'. Or `message-prune-recipient-rules'. cf. (info "(message)Wide Reply") From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136177665028138 (code B ref -1); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:18:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2013 07:17:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48758 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sJV-0007Jn-Vq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:17:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42901) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sJU-0007Jg-8Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:17:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sHt-0006XX-6l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:15:50 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:42040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sHt-0006XP-3g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:15:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sHq-0006LQ-VB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:15:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sHo-0006WQ-Ps for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:15:46 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sHo-0006Vz-JI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:15:44 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sI4-0001tb-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:16:00 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:16:00 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:16:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:15:29 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 66 Message-ID: <8738wksw32.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj4m8auj.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:N//zaeDIfe3UPUEt2UC438+cXtY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Hi Katsumi, Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > Thierry Volpiatto wrote: >> Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >>> Ok, I'll surely try it. > > I tried the last patch. > > [...] >> ,----[ Replying on github ] >>| A "reply-to" header exists: >>| >>| From: Le Wang >>| Reply-To: emacs-helm/helm >>| >>| To: emacs-helm/helm >>| >>| I send a reply with my patch applied: >>| >>| From: Thierry Volpiatto >>| To: emacs-helm/helm >>| >>| Cc: emacs-helm/helm > > Why this /wide reply/ doesn't go to "Le Wang"? Because it is an invalid address, everybody when replying will get the same address, e.g if you reply to github your address will be "Katsumi Yamaoka ", it is why github provide a reply-to header and internally, github will send to the real address of Le Wang. > Even if Le Wang is a subscriber, a regular visitor, or a staff of the > Emacs Helm list, don't we usually include the author of an original > mail in the recipients list if it is a wide reply? Yes unless a "reply-to" header is provided, which is the case here. > Otherwise if Le Wang's address is invalid and you want Gnus to exclude > it from the recipients list, you can use the user option > `message-dont-reply-to-names'. This is an option yes, but I think that when a "reply-to" header is provided, it should take precedence on the "to" header actually provided, isn't it the purpose of the "reply-to" header ? >>| I send a reply with actual code (bug) >>| >>| From: Thierry Volpiatto >>| To: Le Wang >>| Cc: emacs-helm/helm , emacs-helm/helm >>| >> `---- > > Is it ok that both the cases contain ? > You can omit it as well using `message-dont-reply-to-names' (if > you want). This one should not be omitted IMO. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.136177772329711 (code B ref 13321); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:36:01 +0000 Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2013 07:35:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48773 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sal-0007j6-DI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:35:21 -0500 Received: from mail-hampton.hostforweb.net ([216.246.13.138]:36545 helo=hampton.hostforweb.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sai-0007iz-Mq for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:35:17 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:41730 helo=localhost) by hampton.hostforweb.net with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U9sZ7-001zjR-5O for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 01:33:37 -0600 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:33:33 +0900 Message-ID: From: Katsumi Yamaoka References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj4m8auj.fsf@gmail.com> <8738wksw32.fsf@gmail.com> Organization: Emacsen advocacy group X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`; Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu; B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (=?UTF-8?Q?=E7=9C=9F?= Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (i686-pc-cygwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:kcl6UQYsbtofe4IjZ4J+x9z9HwM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - hampton.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: hampton.hostforweb.net: acl_c_authenticated_local_user: yamaoka X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Thierry Volpiatto wrote: > I think that when a "reply-to" header is provided, it should take > precedence on the "to" header actually provided, isn't it the > purpose of the "reply-to" header ? That may be a sound argument, but mailing lists that use Reply-To seem not a few. Actually, I often needed to resend my wide reply to the author. There was no means to help it in the old Gnus. OTOH, you have handy options. :) From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13617839926655 (code B ref -1); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:20:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2013 09:19:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48925 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uDv-0001jH-G8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:19:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44678) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uDt-0001jA-EM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:19:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCG-0002RD-MB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:10 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:55995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCG-0002R8-J5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCF-0004nW-Dq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCD-0002QP-Dc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:07 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40017) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCD-0002QI-6D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:05 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCU-0001dq-6X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:18:22 +0100 Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:18:22 +0100 Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:18:22 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Thierry Volpiatto Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:17:46 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Lines: 22 Message-ID: <87y5ecah1h.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj4m8auj.fsf@gmail.com> <8738wksw32.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:odBuDga5cY+MWxBCXuOUv+h7p/w= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Hi Katsumi, Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > Thierry Volpiatto wrote: >> I think that when a "reply-to" header is provided, it should take >> precedence on the "to" header actually provided, isn't it the >> purpose of the "reply-to" header ? > > That may be a sound argument, but mailing lists that use Reply-To > seem not a few. Actually, I often needed to resend my wide reply > to the author. There was no means to help it in the old Gnus. > OTOH, you have handy options. :) Ok, I trust you ;-), anyway using `message-dont-reply-to-names' fix the problem. Thanks. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 From unknown Tue Sep 23 08:11:37 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Thierry Volpiatto Subject: bug#13321: closed (Re: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github) Message-ID: References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 13321 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Reply-To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:32:01 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1361791921-18145-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1361791921-18145-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github which was filed against the emacs,gnus package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 13321@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 13321: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D13321 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1361791921-18145-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 13321-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2013 11:31:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48994 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9wHj-0004iO-AL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:31:59 -0500 Received: from mail-hampton.hostforweb.net ([216.246.13.138]:47037 helo=hampton.hostforweb.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9wHg-0004iH-RO for 13321-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:31:54 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:56313 helo=localhost) by hampton.hostforweb.net with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U9wFx-002MwH-Gu; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 05:30:07 -0600 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:29:57 +0900 Message-ID: From: Katsumi Yamaoka To: thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj4m8auj.fsf@gmail.com> <8738wksw32.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5ecah1h.fsf@gmail.com> Organization: Emacsen advocacy group User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCPz8bKEI=?= Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (i686-pc-cygwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xfva+s7wXEZW+NkF9y6d2bULzOI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - hampton.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: hampton.hostforweb.net: acl_c_authenticated_local_user: root X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13321-done Cc: 13321-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Thierry Volpiatto wrote: > Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >> Thierry Volpiatto wrote: >>> I think that when a "reply-to" header is provided, it should take >>> precedence on the "to" header actually provided, isn't it the >>> purpose of the "reply-to" header ? >> >> That may be a sound argument, but mailing lists that use Reply-To >> seem not a few. Actually, I often needed to resend my wide reply >> to the author. There was no means to help it in the old Gnus. >> OTOH, you have handy options. :) > Ok, I trust you ;-), anyway using `message-dont-reply-to-names' fix the > problem. Thanks! ------------=_1361791921-18145-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2012 17:42:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38298 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjNL-00061r-2h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:42:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjNC-00061e-As for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:42:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjLw-0005cw-6Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:51 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:59073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjLw-0005cs-12 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjLq-00085t-Or for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjLp-0005bM-Kx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:38 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com ([74.125.82.178]:51685) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpjLp-0005bI-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:37 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x43so5976060wey.37 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:40:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=CRaCxWLxlkQOTSwJeUFxmEdQHJXBPJrUGFtDg3L9U5s=; b=fvODuNej09zkmhTP7M/7q1YuMBxkvjCic52e+PTlxb0d2bI1XfGKh2972e3cDrNIOv hwnUY8bn1OxxmSFMEjZrdKnXEbLlszK2i8LfL+nPnfDXtgkd2UjbzgClwChpPY9r6BUI BEuctqBzozmmGnohVyh3j3BXg9W7uFkq0HailQB01P+ns88wo8rqtgF5qT+XCRV1eT+Q bdCy4G5CSIF1pgs7YMoSfNq58J/VVmoM3pcLwYlgjdM1JkTpx99DGdF7mqA62BHWNxcR 9e1TVYQAg7wsQYG502mPqX1TPVLjPF5ponJzdZN8ZisSnmxb/lf0vkNI2fJZpFJurXDd FA+Q== X-Received: by 10.180.33.44 with SMTP id o12mr56790824wii.28.1356975636365; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:40:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell-14z (lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net. [78.243.104.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id df2sm67310583wib.0.2012.12.31.09.40.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:40:35 -0800 (PST) From: Thierry Volpiatto To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:40:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Hi, when replying to github I have now this message from gmail: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: notifications@github.com Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or 550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=6596 ci15si58841657wjb.6 (state 13). --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- this happen when using emacs from trunk. When I switch to emacs-24 branch Gnus works fine, gmail doesn't send such mails. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 ------------=_1361791921-18145-1--