From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:45:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13319: 24.2.91; emacsclient doesn't find server with nonstandard name Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 13319 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13319@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.135697420720290 (code B ref -1); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:17:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2012 17:16:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38248 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpiyk-0005HC-OU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:16:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53699) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpiyh-0005H3-RN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:16:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpixT-000738-SO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:15:33 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:55275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpixT-00070p-P2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:15:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpisc-0003m3-GK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:10:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpisZ-0005du-Cb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:10:26 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:64610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpisZ-0005Ve-1s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:10:23 -0500 Received: from drachen.dragon ([89.204.130.115]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0M4qav-1T6AMp30zl-00yrrc; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:10:11 +0100 From: Michael Heerdegen Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:11:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87zk0u405l.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Oml7KemU5GfVo8KdNNOWcT6G6En5+cmihStbiqIvpez Oz5PeY5uym4o2MEzucAghY4Z+BMuf4Y2ASSSpZvdyH04nAnfHZ 8wD2w+k3sjiszJFUreDA+o5p+bNVUfdDWDWarCPXgbgDZPuRN6 4xB3LBo0JsWV5QbH3V0xQiqULP5VHw1KH4zSktRt1Ra3vW5eVX nORKf4vu5sJbaLYkN4FQXxQkfj45/rcSBwOLTjDCFQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Hi, In emacs -Q, do this: (progn (require 'server) (let ((server-name (concat "server_" (format-time-string "%H:%M:%S")))) (server-start))) Then I try to connect to this server, but it fails: | bash-4.2:mh:~$ /usr/bin/emacsclient ~/.bashrc | /usr/bin/emacsclient: can't find socket; have you started the server? | To start the server in Emacs, type "M-x server-start". | /usr/bin/emacsclient: No socket or alternate editor. Please use: | | --socket-name | --server-file (or environment variable EMACS_SERVER_FILE) | --alternate-editor (or environment variable ALTERNATE_EDITOR) When I explicitly specify the server name with the -s option, emacsclient succeeds. But due to the doc (man page), "emacsclient" should connect to "the first server it finds": | `-s SERVER-NAME' | `--socket-name=SERVER-NAME' | Connect to the Emacs server named SERVER-NAME. The server name is | given by the variable `server-name' on the Emacs server. If this | option is omitted, `emacsclient' connects to the first server it | finds. (This option is not supported on MS-Windows.) Obviously this is not fulfilled here. And it is no useful behavior. If only one server is running (and the socket is located under the canonical path), emacsclient should find and use it. It is arguable which server should be used if more than one is running (and what the "first server it finds" should be). BTW, here is an explanation for why I want to start the server like above (not substantially important for this report): I often make changes to my config file/ elpa installations or rebuild Emacs. To guarantee that I always have a running Emacs (as a fallback when something went wrong and a newly started Emacs fails to start), I keep my old Emacs open and start a new one. If I had just (server-start) in my config, the new Emacs would not start a server (since the old one is still running). After having closed the old Emacs, I had no server running, so I had to manually start the server every time. This is annoying. So I want to start a server with a unique name. Thanks, Michael. In GNU Emacs 24.2.91.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.10) of 2012-12-30 on drachen Bzr revision: rgm@gnu.org-20121230122326-m6gw29pkwjgwqf9d Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10707000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux testing (wheezy) From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:45:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13319: 24.2.91; emacsclient doesn't find server with nonstandard name Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13319 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Michael Heerdegen Cc: 13319@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13319-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13319.13569825591391 (code B ref 13319); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 13319) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2012 19:35:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38327 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpl9T-0000MO-I6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:35:59 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:59717) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpl9Q-0000MF-Gp for 13319@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:35:57 -0500 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3YZpd06ycdz4KK3h; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:34:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3YZpd06kr8zbbgT; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:34:44 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sFl4EP4_EkoA; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:34:36 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: Nkq7SEpYwHKsRyjVHkoz5mRokVu7/wFPaggjAhBJ9c0= Received: from igel.home (ppp-93-104-157-148.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.157.148]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:34:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 05D84CA2A2; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:34:43 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab References: <87zk0u405l.fsf@web.de> X-Yow: What I want to find out is -- do parrots know much about Astro-Turf? Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:34:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87zk0u405l.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:11:18 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Michael Heerdegen writes: > Obviously this is not fulfilled here. And it is no useful behavior. If > only one server is running (and the socket is located under the > canonical path), emacsclient should find and use it. This is questionable. How does it know that a random socket is a emacs server socket? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:45:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13319: 24.2.91; emacsclient doesn't find server with nonstandard name Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13319 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Schwab Cc: 13319@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13319-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13319.135698522812535 (code B ref 13319); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:21:01 +0000 Received: (at 13319) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2012 20:20:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38355 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TplqV-0003G7-Jq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:20:28 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:54267) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TplqR-0003Fw-Qq for 13319@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:20:25 -0500 Received: from drachen.dragon ([89.204.130.115]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0M1o4o-1T1WaN0iba-00tz06; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:19:09 +0100 From: Michael Heerdegen References: <87zk0u405l.fsf@web.de> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:20:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:34:43 +0100") Message-ID: <8738ym3ren.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:3v8eE97fjHmLeLZu90PjIdzdp0CW8yWUmUpjzfPuGZt /1M/a2m2up6oFajlKZx6WkotlUU+GCCuy/Syh5O43WlPJ4dMDo NinWZlwa5wGwxL4S1+eoHD4fnVwGXTA/wzIwa8empEJgKtCy4h EfBx3SCOoV1C1izgZYPpB06ODAisML61D0B2XdIwLU12a0MyPP et9jyMvDhlko1wn9+OWA+vvtY7VxGrLibv1dRsf8Ac= X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Andreas Schwab writes: > Michael Heerdegen writes: > > > Obviously this is not fulfilled here. And it is no useful behavior. If > > only one server is running (and the socket is located under the > > canonical path), emacsclient should find and use it. > > This is questionable. How does it know that a random socket is a emacs > server socket? Here on Debian, it looks under /tmp/emacs$UID. Can there be any other socket? Regards, Michael. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:45:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13319: 24.2.91; emacsclient doesn't find server with nonstandard name Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13319 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Michael Heerdegen Cc: Andreas Schwab , 13319@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13319-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13319.162636459129998 (code B ref 13319); Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 13319) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jul 2021 15:56:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49482 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m43ix-0007nm-GZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:56:31 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58532) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m43iv-0007nV-DK for 13319@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:56:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xJ+sF3YgqUKX3HDK8YgsDxHH2glkOak0KZ5Pgs99xJw=; b=g+9zCO6tC+A02RtODTHDHz9WPw gFLo0q5Sc2/n0FcyWJKrpIdsVPa0cjqx6FcKH0Bz6t1ywGzw783gXUm43fJnDXIMvX4g3J/yPDU4L OOzavEKGA8OhMLtCgQPLi018OIXPT/i8K737pmHCBybaPETv/YVD4gY7EpFa8bvFRMBo=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m43im-0001v1-Cv; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:56:22 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87zk0u405l.fsf@web.de> <8738ym3ren.fsf@web.de> X-Now-Playing: Smagghe & Cross's _#savefabric (8)_: "Sam & Jen" Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:56:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8738ym3ren.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:20:16 +0100") Message-ID: <87czrjina4.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Michael Heerdegen writes: >> > Obviously this is not fulfilled here. And it is no useful behavior. If >> > only one server is running (and the socket is located under the >> > canonical path), emacsclient should find and use i [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Michael Heerdegen writes: >> > Obviously this is not fulfilled here. And it is no useful behavior. If >> > only one server is running (and the socket is located under the >> > canonical path), emacsclient should find and use it. >> >> This is questionable. How does it know that a random socket is a emacs >> server socket? > > Here on Debian, it looks under /tmp/emacs$UID. Can there be any other > socket? This was eight years ago, and some things have changed in this area (like the location of the server socket), but the issue still remains, I think? That is, the client won't look around for a socket with a non-standard name. But I tend to think that this is actually the correct behaviour -- having emacsclient guess at what socket name to use sounds a bit too DWIM to me: I may deliberately have set up a server to do one very specific thing under a non-standard name, and I would not want any random emacsclient invocation to use that special server just because it can't find the standard socket. (Which I may just have forgotten to start the server for.) So I think this behaves as it should. Anybody else got another opinion? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 15 11:56:36 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jul 2021 15:56:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49485 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m43j1-0007o2-Oe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:56:35 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58548) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m43j0-0007ne-63 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:56:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KQZ3If0Hv4A7Kf9a6Rj6T7VzBwE5GveQ1GbYDBTc9xs=; b=J9F8Nwq+a01l/SgaN3wamOfU2M VRdgkOXyG634oBbhpPyFRi6RK9GGsrnx0DaJ9UcIyctYSnRRVz2gcjtos9ZOrv4YFqYkoGhUu053A 5qpXEh2NY5R1wt+GzHxcvL25h+BeKdoILWM+XHlHmkAMJiyCLP+gFYiuvm2GX07RsRrk=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m43is-0001vB-F3 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:56:28 +0200 Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:56:25 +0200 Message-Id: <87bl73in9y.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #13319 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 13319 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 13319 + moreinfo quit From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:45:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13319: 24.2.91; emacsclient doesn't find server with nonstandard name Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13319 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: Andreas Schwab , 13319@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13319-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13319.162639769812096 (code B ref 13319); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:09:01 +0000 Received: (at 13319) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2021 01:08:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50101 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4CKv-000392-Sn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 21:08:18 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:53213) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4CKr-00038l-JW for 13319@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 21:08:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1626397685; bh=nRf+A+6QO7CEAYLbyYm7vnh77rSAjE0/8uaQfNDZlWA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=H6PIbdz59zu5vglvd/OHvKnTcPD4YEmUV2h0v0UbrOh5gkhK9Ebd7YO0wrC08EV21 HJyf0f4JQLnksNRfJmUYE3jJ0/YMi7Bayljn13YwIDPOAP4BGwu86KkCqI203H0JMv LR7iYjfoydJLfJZ4iO+qCuMP9I9odg5wXDhynyoQ= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from drachen.dragon ([88.66.201.45]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MWRzK-1lc5SJ2mz4-00XeUo; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 03:08:05 +0200 From: Michael Heerdegen References: <87zk0u405l.fsf@web.de> <8738ym3ren.fsf@web.de> <87czrjina4.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 03:08:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87czrjina4.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:56:19 +0200") Message-ID: <87y2a7nk0b.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:gT2JZRw2P6ubQegl/3VdaAq+FuM1oW55A0vizx1bIU/GYrSpQ2B f2DCrC7RpDeFMboTmlqtVLUQ4DEKhUNyZu+i4RX6VIyAh1hrQBRuKOcC3ofoHayQEdPxcp2 bhYQMhcshbTZs1PC58QsG2ytD6zB7Tf9iKPZFVc+d76MdLZxDZaCiFsmHBrDGLu2Yb3a95/ NmV07hY0hha+IyT3tjOhQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:O/2ZpRw6H98=:e3Rfqp1DOE86WZ+Fy1XvN4 uXKHj7/GoIkGK89Ejim3190+7RrbWslUAYg3s7Ey80CQu8M+n9w1XroFkNLiR/Phgvsr6R624 bDvYzWfS6ccB+CWOzTrVu91AaBYxJaJCvJz9jL4Uc/6en2hJFfr8fhXHFS9yu00xKylt06OOn GGUhTHqoU3Z+LGOlK1+NnsX1ayFkIwuUls4qkfWUuR1eBFkmg4DKzlJ3nnfQLPpbmbO4Fof+O LN0eW5mwhsJb9pz8ydKek+JWNfNoqWXaTvDnCVdO1LQIYYS508ekmRWldP6IgH8mJtWW7Fibx jgnu41j+Sr8lnsh11tRScVNKpfq2wMln4YII2UUddSLZzaDIYyGZ4bnUTuBonSBhGq+5TYAk/ FakRKclrTFVORTmZnN60XRSVDigQlwr+M9NhMsbUlcudhNxjgRM89Nc01o49yPJrZAMEr5k8s pf4TBF37gG6C1YVTnjz4GVgn/NNK+SZMFgoPe5e7tqIBRRPhfvECtrA8n8Yf4+B3ZMJkK+9ma g+hLP3YKpzc0BoooJH60U9cQMORw4pZKcmYwgyhwylgL5fZWGLaC81fMDIQQYvhY+jeAegq/q BWtEt/bCOahGjH6L8ELFAbENHTF8HNmQJSo8fGW+ivrsrpx8Ex/HykGhDhSowHGbJn/2FpIMa /+0xemCiQk7ZsRxNhUSZMLxN1P2pzdZQpOfTjWLvIWP/XargGqh3I0GFwgm+KS3Ecb95ZYqps DcBmwtaIrlkgkrYIjA6O1qGx2KALBPYcBGrQMXBuAIjdS1c+HUKBp/2eC4LF7W4tzF60DGoac XXMZ7VZztOmiJ84jn1cZspKEyYgD+iL49dCUMvviTKL1HVZMbgcXLO6UD7XAcGlLNTanvt79y s4IWPvx+bJU0qHj33lSmIg5JjM9o5BWyh12xhbg5vhLRv296VfLtOfS1xoHh1w7ccXr/2e7M3 lCrdSvAoBMOwlzv72gTFmijKphzU+5JP2jxEXbc2Cb1ry22v1X5aFX6k057V84sqkyPrE8t/V Rfm9C7u9Rbc6aT9I8EKUyrYTLac1VSbyqdZVj+UY4E3unF2nlq+4LA6ZYM8R+s2+dw9EFBPNb qYKBPKgVMbqU8UNsUR1CpHxDVzEVwHDU51vqxX3gCvqtgsb458+qy+dxg== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> This is questionable. How does it know that a random socket is a emacs > >> server socket? > > > > Here on Debian, it looks under /tmp/emacs$UID. Can there be any other > > socket? > > This was eight years ago, and some things have changed in this area > (like the location of the server socket), but the issue still remains, I > think? Seems so. > That is, the client won't look around for a socket with a > non-standard name. > > But I tend to think that this is actually the correct behaviour -- > having emacsclient guess at what socket name to use sounds a bit too > DWIM to me: I may deliberately have set up a server to do one very > specific thing under a non-standard name, and I would not want any > random emacsclient invocation to use that special server just because it > can't find the standard socket. (Which I may just have forgotten to > start the server for.) What would happen in this case? Can't you use another place to store the socket then? > So I think this behaves as it should. Anybody else got another opinion? I don't know if something like you describe could be prevented. If you are sure that my suggestion would cause trouble, then I'm ok with closing. I'm too ignorant about how this socket stuff is working to have an opinion. Michael. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:45:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13319: 24.2.91; emacsclient doesn't find server with nonstandard name Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13319 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Michael Heerdegen Cc: Andreas Schwab , 13319@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13319-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13319.162642537530626 (code B ref 13319); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:50:01 +0000 Received: (at 13319) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2021 08:49:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50476 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4JXL-0007xu-AR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 04:49:35 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38640) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4JXJ-0007xi-Cl for 13319@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 04:49:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dBZK6V+pt17liCQ7+nXr7pitcu/mZeDn97BR2aXUT9s=; b=r0csZB4WCC2SJyQc2oCk3s47zm pGIP7rikbtAFOlDN9n0cDDGpcwKXOdjbNr1ceL95CimWWj1tPrVEsA522OrajnLp0m8xIa+mVt7+W RwPjlbRMH71JiGlEEYIVTgCEK9hvAEeFKJCCPE4B6AIdGlauNrQbTSiyS3mzPnUUhdHM=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m4JXA-00028x-Qk; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:49:27 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87zk0u405l.fsf@web.de> <8738ym3ren.fsf@web.de> <87czrjina4.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2a7nk0b.fsf@web.de> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAADFBMVEXOzbqcgVtSVEj/ //8/vFkLAAAAAWJLR0QDEQxM8gAAAAd0SU1FB+UHEAgpJB4ygZwAAAF3SURBVCjPbdLBSgMxEADQ iWwW9NRCV1jPIvgXu8X2HCETMCcFW9h8RS9ePFVoevDUym4x85XOpC0iuBDIyyQzs9kF+OeZnCc1 QGUe9OsZ2hbVMVhbUFbVOgMt6M34dIpRWbBgAApoka1wtuazjcKxMwrnO4DLBlCHBu6vGVcMPDSq RoY2DN+3Vp0xPLYr1/MZAw4Nqgxt4QYbNSqu+rytRu7nhhjFBPQTXOzuwkaKgsbm4dl9ckS1oKJp bklQvME0IhCR1PloVbQXRyhrdMR5Goi7LvG2RMS0D7ItJscISeroSDQw+gwk6hm7aUagYeZo4U6R 1HYh+F/49HkCzTq/PXCjhQC7bnmQRq+JIro+0IjhBH7t93y5WjDrXpbWHDHoxbJPq5xtayt0Q5C7 7ogy3vnT6UDpPnD670lG9AtG4tTa0xoHwS6jt3mbpOY1lJY2DV/8UnojjnGdkouS5yGvXcpky+PA dUo6Rr6S1FmE2FW0dZu/v9YPH/Cx7EWakAAAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMDctMTZU MDg6NDE6MzYrMDA6MDBt+tLWAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTA3LTE2VDA4OjQxOjM2 KzAwOjAwHKdqagAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Four Tet's _Sixteen Oceans_: "Romantics" Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:49:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2a7nk0b.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Fri, 16 Jul 2021 03:08:04 +0200") Message-ID: <87sg0ed4ob.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Michael Heerdegen writes: > What would happen in this case? Can't you use another place to store > the socket then? I can, but I don't see how that's a better design. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Michael Heerdegen writes: > What would happen in this case? Can't you use another place to store > the socket then? I can, but I don't see how that's a better design. >> So I think this behaves as it should. Anybody else got another opinion? > > I don't know if something like you describe could be prevented. If you > are sure that my suggestion would cause trouble, then I'm ok with > closing. I think it would, but I'd like to hear whether anybody else has an opinion here... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:45:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13319: 24.2.91; emacsclient doesn't find server with nonstandard name Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13319 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, schwab@linux-m68k.org, 13319@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13319-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13319.162643466715055 (code B ref 13319); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:25:02 +0000 Received: (at 13319) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2021 11:24:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50617 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4LxD-0003ul-Lh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:24:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35626) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4Lx9-0003uX-T2 for 13319@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:24:26 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m4Lx4-0005jA-C2; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:24:18 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2308 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m4Lx4-0003V8-1p; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:24:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:24:05 +0300 Message-Id: <838s265woa.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87sg0ed4ob.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:49:24 +0200) References: <87zk0u405l.fsf@web.de> <8738ym3ren.fsf@web.de> <87czrjina4.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2a7nk0b.fsf@web.de> <87sg0ed4ob.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:49:24 +0200 > Cc: Andreas Schwab , 13319@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> So I think this behaves as it should. Anybody else got another opinion? > > > > I don't know if something like you describe could be prevented. If you > > are sure that my suggestion would cause trouble, then I'm ok with > > closing. > > I think it would, but I'd like to hear whether anybody else has an > opinion here... I think we should fix the documentation to not say anything about "the first available socket" there. If the socket name is not the default one, the user should tell emacsclient which socket to use. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:45:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13319: 24.2.91; emacsclient doesn't find server with nonstandard name Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13319 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, schwab@linux-m68k.org, 13319@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13319-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13319.162643989224502 (code B ref 13319); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:52:02 +0000 Received: (at 13319) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2021 12:51:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50844 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4NJU-0006N8-9A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:51:32 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40850) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4NJP-0006Mm-Us for 13319@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:51:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hs0hA6t0RES1Njpkd5Yag0HMEYBsu2p1/vORad1zw+o=; b=eNL37AaJSQ4yCVEfCx2cFmEzTl yBY6QNJlHstCWamLbR1/HWuJj7fvhdrp0Ozu91qc1yKcqvzPchV/c6Hcp/rGtvf+DTJKICdWALrhw 0h+7jSYVl9dhlIw7BirEDQ/4rPb8SpPDfYGYQbv3uoQvAmtX/ZVWPUJIIrvZ/H+bMRok=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m4NJG-0004RW-VD; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:51:21 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87zk0u405l.fsf@web.de> <8738ym3ren.fsf@web.de> <87czrjina4.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2a7nk0b.fsf@web.de> <87sg0ed4ob.fsf@gnus.org> <838s265woa.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Privacy's _Fabric 94: Steffi_: "Broke" Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:51:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <838s265woa.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:24:05 +0300") Message-ID: <87lf668lrt.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think we should fix the documentation to not say anything about "the > first available socket" there. If the socket name is not the default > one, the user should tell emacsclient which socket to [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think we should fix the documentation to not say anything about "the > first available socket" there. If the socket name is not the default > one, the user should tell emacsclient which socket to use. Yup. Done, and closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 16 08:51:34 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2021 12:51:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50846 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4NJW-0006NI-Fh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:51:34 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40868) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4NJT-0006Mq-4m for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:51:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4GXObt9Sh1BvYvVT2mNQCaXjapTBj9RcTfGZ5+Ce7ig=; b=T0tA3bNOhIcCGLuXAQ95Cr/FnH taupRicv/OfTfk8jSbg9Sf1TUT2mjpq2lV9yb9hGoMp3KCnbqPM/lRD/DTmUabefW3xpGGQHlqQRH yqUFWz+RUpUAIaVrwjHeYioNeWC1KIvj8XFws6Pg59S5YrDwaQ2GFtk5/kptsmyKg3xQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m4NJL-0004Rd-Jd for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:51:25 +0200 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:51:23 +0200 Message-Id: <87k0lq8lro.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #13319 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 13319 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 13319 28.1 quit