GNU bug report logs - #1321
process-lines

Previous Next

Full log

Message #12 received at 1321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Peder O. Klingenberg" <peder <at> klingenberg.no>
To: Daniel Colascione <dancol <at> dancol.org>
Cc: 1321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#1321: process-lines
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:37:38 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 15 Mar, 2015, at 0:45, Daniel Colascione <dancol <at> dancol.org> wrote:
> 
> What about defining a `process-lines-2' that takes keyword arguments and
> accepts a list for PROGRAM?

That’s another possibility, of course.  But in my opinion, the &rest is usually a more convenient API for the callers, saving them the trouble of consing up a new list.  Also, I find functions with -N suffixes to be less descriptive names than they should be.

In my haste to send a patch last night, I managed to send the wrong version, one that didn’t work as advertised.  Sorry.  Please ignore my previous patch and consider this one instead:


...Peder...
-- 
Sløv uten dop

[0001-Extend-process-lines-to-allow-exit-status-handling-v2.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.