Subject: bug#1321: process-lines

From: "Peder O. Klingenberg" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:36:26 +0100

Just adding an optional argument to process-lines is difficult without breaking the API, due to its use of &rest.  I suggest something along the lines of the following patch:

...Peder...
-- 
Sløv uten dop