From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 15 14:34:46 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2012 19:34:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44361 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjxVV-0005ud-OU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:34:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60807) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjxVS-0005uW-Uy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:34:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjxUO-0008Iq-NY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:33:37 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:40337) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjxUO-0008Im-KH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:33:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43936) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjxUN-0001wV-Ky for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:33:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjxUM-0008Ia-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:33:35 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:50433) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjxUM-0008IW-Bn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:33:34 -0500 Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qBFJXWY3018095 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:33:33 GMT Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBFJXW3P029687 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:33:32 GMT Received: from abhmt110.oracle.com (abhmt110.oracle.com [141.146.116.62]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qBFJXVxi010839 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:33:31 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/71.202.147.44) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:33:31 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" To: Subject: 24.3.50; Emacs crashes without Emacs fatal error dialog box Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:33:24 -0800 Message-ID: <6B14B87F986441F29F6C44F0C96099E4@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Thread-Index: Ac3a+wyO+dGLcigtS16MPR3uWcOoiQ== X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) Dunno whether there is an Emacs bug here - you decide. HTH. Lately Emacs has "crashed" several times, but without showing the Emacs fatal-error dialog box that asks whether I want to use GDB. Instead, I get only the MS crash dialog box that asks me whether I want to send info about the crash to MS. Again, dunno whether this will mean anything helpful to you. If not, feel free to close the bug. In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2012-12-13 on ODIEONE Bzr revision: 111211 eggert@cs.ucla.edu-20121213021749-eyqqen0ewhn2hogq Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -IC:/Devel/emacs/build/include -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-type-limits -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-pointer-sign -Wdeclaration-after-statement --ldflags -LC:/Devel/emacs/build/lib' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 15 15:01:17 2012 Received: (at 13196-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2012 20:01:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44376 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjxvA-0006Ys-OP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:01:16 -0500 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:40620) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tjxv5-0006Ya-Pk for 13196-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:01:14 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MF300H008UIJC00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 13196-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:59:49 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MF300HOO8VOGB20@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:59:49 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:59:50 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#13196: 24.3.50; Emacs crashes without Emacs fatal error dialog box In-reply-to: <6B14B87F986441F29F6C44F0C96099E4@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Drew Adams Message-id: <83zk1fqe6h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6B14B87F986441F29F6C44F0C96099E4@us.oracle.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:33:24 -0800 > > Dunno whether there is an Emacs bug here - you decide. HTH. There certainly is. > Lately Emacs has "crashed" several times, but without showing the Emacs > fatal-error dialog box that asks whether I want to use GDB. Instead, I > get only the MS crash dialog box that asks me whether I want to send > info about the crash to MS. > > Again, dunno whether this will mean anything helpful to you. If not, > feel free to close the bug. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13196-done Cc: 13196-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:33:24 -0800 > > Dunno whether there is an Emacs bug here - you decide. HTH. There certainly is. > Lately Emacs has "crashed" several times, but without showing the Emacs > fatal-error dialog box that asks whether I want to use GDB. Instead, I > get only the MS crash dialog box that asks me whether I want to send > info about the crash to MS. > > Again, dunno whether this will mean anything helpful to you. If not, > feel free to close the bug. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4978] > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:33:24 -0800 > > Dunno whether there is an Emacs bug here - you decide. HTH. There certainly is. > Lately Emacs has "crashed" several times, but without showing the Emacs > fatal-error dialog box that asks whether I want to use GDB. Instead, I > get only the MS crash dialog box that asks me whether I want to send > info about the crash to MS. > > Again, dunno whether this will mean anything helpful to you. If not, > feel free to close the bug. You are supposed to attach GDB to such a crashed Emacs and report the backtrace. Without that, this report is useless. Closing. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:44:26 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator