From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13140@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13552410468097 (code B ref -1); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:51:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2012 15:50:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37292 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiS6W-00026U-LK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:50:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42281) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiS6T-00026M-4B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:50:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiS5i-0000Go-Nb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:49:59 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:34496) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiS5i-0000GR-KX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:49:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiS5b-0002Ql-TN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:49:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiS5V-00005E-SZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:49:47 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:47991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiS5V-0008VG-LQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:49:41 -0500 Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qBBFndvq018266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:49:39 GMT Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBBFncZc017952 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:49:39 GMT Received: from abhmt116.oracle.com (abhmt116.oracle.com [141.146.116.68]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qBBFnckR016152 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:49:38 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.239.109) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:49:38 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:49:33 -0800 Message-ID: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Thread-Index: Ac3Xtx1GNDTi2fdFRgqanz8gs92FVQ== X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) Backtrace: 0x01154B7D 0x01154BEF 0x01001459 0x0102190E 0x0114A734 0x7E418730 0x7E418812 0x7E4189C9 0x7E418A0C 0x01148D5C 0x01148FFB 0x7C80B725 BTW, ever since the introduction of the emacs_backtrace.txt files, when I get a crash now I get TWO fatal-error dialog boxes, not one. One is on top of the other (staggered slightly), and interacting with the top one (I click No) removes both of them and ends Emacs (closes all frames). In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2012-12-07 on MS-W7-DANI Bzr revision: 111150 eggert@cs.ucla.edu-20121207175317-wxhrqxpp0173whq0 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -Ic:/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.10/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.10/src -Ic:/emacs/libs/libpng-1.2.37-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/zlib-1.2.5 -Ic:/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libxml2-2.7.8-w32-bin/include/libxml2 -Ic:/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9-w32-bin/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libiconv-1.9.2-1-lib/include' From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: 13140@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.13552416319020 (code B ref 13140); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:01:01 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2012 16:00:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37298 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSFy-0002LQ-RF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:00:31 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:47844) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSFi-0002L2-6o for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:00:29 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MEV00500J27G700@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:59:31 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MEV004GKJ36VVB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:59:30 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:59:25 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:49:33 -0800 > > BTW, ever since the introduction of the emacs_backtrace.txt files, when I get a > crash now I get TWO fatal-error dialog boxes, not one. One is on top of the > other (staggered slightly), and interacting with the top one (I click No) > removes both of them and ends Emacs (closes all frames). [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:49:33 -0800 > > BTW, ever since the introduction of the emacs_backtrace.txt files, when I get a > crash now I get TWO fatal-error dialog boxes, not one. One is on top of the > other (staggered slightly), and interacting with the top one (I click No) > removes both of them and ends Emacs (closes all frames). [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:49:33 -0800 > > BTW, ever since the introduction of the emacs_backtrace.txt files, when I get a > crash now I get TWO fatal-error dialog boxes, not one. One is on top of the > other (staggered slightly), and interacting with the top one (I click No) > removes both of them and ends Emacs (closes all frames). This means Emacs gets a second fatal error while processing the first one. From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" Cc: 13140@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.13552818625297 (code B ref 13140); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2012 03:11:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37892 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ticis-0001NO-DW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:11:02 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:20687) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ticiq-0001N0-Dt for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:11:01 -0500 Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qBC3AEW3015963 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:10:15 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBC3ADg8011704 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:10:13 GMT Received: from abhmt109.oracle.com (abhmt109.oracle.com [141.146.116.61]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qBC3AC58002093; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:10:12 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.143.154) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:10:12 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:10:04 -0800 Message-ID: <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> Thread-Index: Ac3XuIWo6m85CZBhSwOLQNHrx5IIJwAXWefg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) > > BTW, ever since the introduction of the emacs_backtrace.txt > > files, when I get a crash now I get TWO fatal-error dialog > > boxes, not one. One is on top of the other (staggered > > slightly), and interacting with the top one (I click No) > > removes both of them and ends Emacs (closes all frames). > > This means Emacs gets a second fatal error while processing > the first one. OK, well it seems to happen systematically - ever since the introduction of emacs_backtrace.txt. Dunno if others are seeing this, but IIRC I've seen it each time Emacs created a backtrace file. From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" Cc: 13140@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.135528462013162 (code B ref 13140); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2012 03:57:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TidRM-0003QF-BO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:57:00 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:48650) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TidRK-0003Q6-T1 for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:56:59 -0500 Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qBC3uD67012752 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:56:14 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBC3uCvi008530 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:56:13 GMT Received: from abhmt115.oracle.com (abhmt115.oracle.com [141.146.116.67]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qBC3uCki024037; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:56:12 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.143.154) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:56:12 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com><83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:56:05 -0800 Message-ID: <1BED98CE8ED34517BA8C36952BCB46B1@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> Thread-Index: Ac3XuIWo6m85CZBhSwOLQNHrx5IIJwAXWefgAAGiD4A= X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) I didn't pay attention that the backtraces I got today were in fact identical. Sorry about that. (I keep getting them.) From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: 13140@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.135528478413454 (code B ref 13140); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2012 03:59:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37945 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TidTz-0003Ut-N6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:59:44 -0500 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:58780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TidTy-0003Um-D1 for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:59:42 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MEW00F00G3UHV00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:58:56 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MEW00FT9GE8ET60@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:58:56 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:58:52 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83ip879b0j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <13140@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:10:04 -0800 > > > > BTW, ever since the introduction of the emacs_backtrace.txt > > > files, when I get a crash now I get TWO fatal-error dialog > > > boxes, not one. One is on top of the other (staggered > > > slightly), and interacting with the top one (I click No) > > > removes both of them and ends Emacs (closes all frames). > > > > This means Emacs gets a second fatal error while processing > > the first one. > > OK, well it seems to happen systematically - ever since the introduction of > emacs_backtrace.txt. Dunno if others are seeing this, but IIRC I've seen it > each time Emacs created a backtrace file. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <13140@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:10:04 -0800 > > > > BTW, ever since the introduction of the emacs_backtrace.txt > > > files, when I get a crash now I get TWO fatal-error dialog > > > boxes, not one. One is on top of the other (staggered > > > slightly), and interacting with the top one (I click No) > > > removes both of them and ends Emacs (closes all frames). > > > > This means Emacs gets a second fatal error while processing > > the first one. > > OK, well it seems to happen systematically - ever since the introduction of > emacs_backtrace.txt. Dunno if others are seeing this, but IIRC I've seen it > each time Emacs created a backtrace file. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4998] > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <13140@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:10:04 -0800 > > > > BTW, ever since the introduction of the emacs_backtrace.txt > > > files, when I get a crash now I get TWO fatal-error dialog > > > boxes, not one. One is on top of the other (staggered > > > slightly), and interacting with the top one (I click No) > > > removes both of them and ends Emacs (closes all frames). > > > > This means Emacs gets a second fatal error while processing > > the first one. > > OK, well it seems to happen systematically - ever since the introduction of > emacs_backtrace.txt. Dunno if others are seeing this, but IIRC I've seen it > each time Emacs created a backtrace file. It never happened to me. From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 13140@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.13552975301881 (code B ref 13140); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2012 07:32:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38094 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TignZ-0000UG-9y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:32:10 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:35448) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TignW-0000U8-R8 for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:32:07 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so332203oag.3 for <13140@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:31:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JpBHW/su7Ovfx69jEKfU/FnMH93alWlk6JC8mK/UU4U=; b=FskE+Zb0AQV8ewHlli8loZlpIodmy6y3MAzJoFTDy2xoLq1Rlx0hnUhVOhzzcHugJ7 JmneCPmWh4cMRy5RkqmHP3LWad2JnrcvemZXFNDkYO51aysrsN8vzGirpPR9xZ9rZpyL xDi8t9IFDYM8luLub2Y0yvYa7Vr6QIQWpqmrxd/n+v4hi9AXS0Kf0efyA5gRiKBtZuPn XX3A7bRfmOkPl2fpqFUVbzH7WiUi/bATWa3Ia6Fz2U91e1i/zngQ0aoa3a9cKZ6BZCXl AeWgCguEOGAoVon4nMZe2BqRB0ztmpys2+OKJg1WkFXsuMkjIbsH47wQyqjcpkL1Y0pA /xbA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.92.70 with SMTP id ck6mr28596obb.46.1355297480988; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:31:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.11.39 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:31:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83ip879b0j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> <83ip879b0j.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:31:20 +0100 Message-ID: From: Dani Moncayo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) >> > > BTW, ever since the introduction of the emacs_backtrace.txt >> > > files, when I get a crash now I get TWO fatal-error dialog >> > > boxes, not one. One is on top of the other (staggered >> > > slightly), and interacting with the top one (I click No) >> > > removes both of them and ends Emacs (closes all frames). >> > >> > This means Emacs gets a second fatal error while processing >> > the first one. >> >> OK, well it seems to happen systematically - ever since the introduction of >> emacs_backtrace.txt. Dunno if others are seeing this, but IIRC I've seen it >> each time Emacs created a backtrace file. > > It never happened to me. In case this is somehow due to a defect in the build I made [1], it would be good that someone made and upload a build of the current trunk, so that Drew could try it and see if the crashes happen then too. -------------- [1] Although the last one was made with a clean bootstrap, but who knows. -- Dani Moncayo From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Dani Moncayo Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 13140@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.13553001466155 (code B ref 13140); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2012 08:15:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TihTl-0001bB-D7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:15:45 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:51833) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TihTj-0001b2-1s for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:15:43 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TihSy-0006xN-Om; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:14:56 -0500 From: Glenn Morris References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> <83ip879b0j.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: Bin Laden Al-Qaeda IMF Watergate Montenegro JUWTF AMW X-Ran: Kgg~]s5J"Rj!YUh#l'4r^1o:#6>68j_UK:N?X'y2!ORc< X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:14:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:31:20 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Dani Moncayo wrote: > In case this is somehow due to a defect in the build I made [1], it > would be good that someone made and upload a build of the current > trunk, so that Drew could try it and see if the crashes happen then > too. Why do some people on MS Windows find it impossible to build Emacs for themselves? From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: 13140@debbugs.gnu.org, Dani Moncayo Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.135532574617492 (code B ref 13140); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:23:02 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2012 15:22:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39152 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tio8f-0004Y5-Br for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:22:25 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:49311) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tio8c-0004Xv-LU for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:22:23 -0500 Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w11so439453bku.3 for <13140@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:21:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Wblq6cePeu4Ms21xT7Lz6N5/ol2g0l5gsOsc8TOa2w4=; b=qwh7SaDr/1nTB5yI3G12sOmuHEBgq/P4tJvAoB7Yc1iXbfqMz02tkUr4rdwbISHAE3 EfMXKQgmUuPuCL4gFMDQXYBTs+vEaSGqOF8v5fqTppHlOSJe1uw17VK2ycZK1ElMV7Rp EbgySIwYONqeAjzMnRB1ThbOR96vwWahSqKBpjbcsE1aZfIesvIboMmwCqIUmTF9btau oQknv+/X6K9FVnyEvWt6DS7ulN1zmCZt6+soiHm4LoGYA+HgGXNe4Mzl4zziuVKoJhJl QRhxqUjW2wIPNA2DtsDsOEHgLXnZbZgPqMZf30oee0FeITM85OECphTYgTEUCEtjhqtN /zxw== Received: by 10.204.156.139 with SMTP id x11mr699289bkw.128.1355325693265; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:21:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.34.70 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:20:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> <83ip879b0j.fsf@gnu.org> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:20:52 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > Why do some people on MS Windows find it impossible to build Emacs for > themselves? Not impossible, but Windows users do not have a package manager to ease downloading all the required tools (compiler and build environment, plus image libraries, some unix-style tools, etc.). If the user does not really need all these except to compile Emacs, it's understandable that some or many of them will chose to avoid the hassle and rely on prepackaged binaries. Juanma From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "'Glenn Morris'" , "'Dani Moncayo'" Cc: 13140@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.135532915222851 (code B ref 13140); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:20:01 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2012 16:19:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39218 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tip1b-0005wT-LT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:19:12 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:43632) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tip1Z-0005wG-MR for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:19:10 -0500 Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qBCGILUc027463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:18:22 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBCGILxS028250 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:18:21 GMT Received: from abhmt109.oracle.com (abhmt109.oracle.com [141.146.116.61]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qBCGIK61002602; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:18:20 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.143.154) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:18:20 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com><83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org><755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com><83ip879b0j.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:18:12 -0800 Message-ID: <4DE92C496888404DA99063C479C49E56@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Ac3YQNvBBkwJKZVhSnenzMTs9u7LxQAQyGWQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) > > In case this is somehow due to a defect in the build I made [1], it > > would be good that someone made and upload a build of the current > > trunk, so that Drew could try it and see if the crashes happen then > > too. > > Why do some people on MS Windows find it impossible to build Emacs for > themselves? How could anyone answer wrt your hypothetical "some people"? And are you perhaps presuming that anyone who does not build Emacs "finds it impossible" to do so? What is your real problem about this? And how is it related to fixing the bug reported in this thread? From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 13140@debbugs.gnu.org, Dani Moncayo Melgar Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.13553360494716 (code B ref 13140); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2012 18:14:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39342 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tiqor-0001E0-AD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:14:09 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]:50711) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tiqoo-0001Dr-Bd for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:14:07 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f172.google.com with SMTP id a1so367435eaa.3 for <13140@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:13:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=w659vJ6mtrO7sKcCRmAzRYHsdTlZ1TvbGk9N8XR9rKI=; b=rb5TSgj3pAqd5BlOPye9i3CThEP135ITF1v18RhqP7UGu052KQhBovYWuX8lYC21n5 Ajz7FWcgyVq/whwEFBtw7FuGPWmx3zxUVQEQxRtInkYWQcZM5gvBmFjKuBPmajW8Omb/ Rh+ed3KfBTb5gV3nOh7tukxLOai0LYfyzptbwL2uhgrnE1U6huXAP5ajcEDx3k7AtOs6 W57mxOz6QSzVgvw6RA7/6JxOsFsf/BReHWHeNSEnoBPuk6IX8HoO7XoDrr6l+7namn9M GRd2oa4EB3wRodod0XSki9ZU5o+NKjhBEunumTKkYr5uz/mXvbYC3to8LQezzEJD/W/V 6j4A== Received: by 10.14.174.198 with SMTP id x46mr4849533eel.23.1355335956914; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:12:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.4.209 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:11:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> <83ip879b0j.fsf@gnu.org> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:11:56 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Dani Moncayo wrote: > In case this is somehow due to a defect in the build I made [1], it > would be good that someone made and upload a build of the current > trunk, so that Drew could try it and see if the crashes happen then > too. Drew, if you're interested you can grab a build from today's trunk at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/3pgcb3iiy8s9irl/c171Xhsd99 Juanma From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "'Juanma Barranquero'" Cc: 'Eli Zaretskii' , 13140@debbugs.gnu.org, 'Dani Moncayo Melgar' Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.13553361364852 (code B ref 13140); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2012 18:15:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39346 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiqqF-0001GC-VO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:15:36 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:20059) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiqqD-0001G5-PW for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:15:34 -0500 Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qBCIEiDm002947 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:14:45 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBCIEhn5013205 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:14:44 GMT Received: from abhmt117.oracle.com (abhmt117.oracle.com [141.146.116.69]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qBCIEhtr006905; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:14:43 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.8) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:14:43 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> <83ip879b0j.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:14:42 -0800 Message-ID: <1474EA2F8498440A8D965F85109F627B@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Ac3YlFss6daNOOctRWK6+KdZmua+qgAAB64Q X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) > Drew, if you're interested you can grab a build from today's trunk at > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/3pgcb3iiy8s9irl/c171Xhsd99 Thanks, Juanma. I'll pick it up tonight after work. From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Juanma Barranquero Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 13140@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.13554284809083 (code B ref 13140); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:55:01 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2012 19:54:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41298 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjEre-0002MQ-Sh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:54:40 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:58602) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjErd-0002MJ-2T for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:54:37 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so2737845oag.3 for <13140@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:53:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=265VpSTGTLRPV4lGOU7wv842Ux9Du1p6yywYVOZ/9qU=; b=nC/Mm7Jm5NwkbUCHnetuSpYADZJOgFHrChtuxPqiAJUxydRvKOADRxOOia2njlD8CV MiXyR1oo+HvvB42kz2ZIhI/ImcfQgc53XAm2myspazgyjWtfF5EO6M2Wc01iFtM5RtzI WTNHYk/b7phRU0PUbKBSZtevouo4WjR0sJm+JE9dJ1NyJMguG+TVWU9kgemMwS7cr19l xbVzFx9RQmzlvzs+UvtHCggEKFTdFsEr+OJnO5kRPGyL1BQXokLHm14znuqh8+F9wCGU zP+hTS+J0qJNhxhgVMobNiF8QhuJWRgvIvG+rCzD+veElXm6yp7gwkYERiwOPeZoLzqQ 4GsQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.116.6 with SMTP id js6mr2501062obb.82.1355428421420; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:53:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.11.39 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:53:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> <83ip879b0j.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:53:41 +0100 Message-ID: From: Dani Moncayo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) >> In case this is somehow due to a defect in the build I made [1], it >> would be good that someone made and upload a build of the current >> trunk, so that Drew could try it and see if the crashes happen then >> too. > > Drew, if you're interested you can grab a build from today's trunk at > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/3pgcb3iiy8s9irl/c171Xhsd99 Juanma, did you configure with "--enable-checking" ? I ask this because I configured with it, and IIUC, these backtraces that Drew is getting are due to assertions which are enabled only if Emacs was configured with that option. OTOH, I also passed "--no-opt" to the configure script, which perhaps might make a difference too. -- Dani Moncayo From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Juanma Barranquero Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 13140@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.135542913010391 (code B ref 13140); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:06:01 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2012 20:05:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41303 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjF29-0002hU-34 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:05:30 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:41494) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjF26-0002hM-92 for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:05:27 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so2751564oag.3 for <13140@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:04:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HDD62Joak2tYn8P8nhhTfS6AJrsV/aGVgqt73A1RLbk=; b=MDaydZEmko56Gbe2aXUroeCOL2/3Pk8AxPaQhzLSFuoi9AlbqmxQ9UwoQXlsM4Cind vE8ZMxRh5b3TcIix6TAi93wWHFppgo1s0vkuxdISp7/JH6+2rTfuK1YHHtB4vfstEZM5 YLSK0H+dsP+CLY42DNDOYIiLSJGV05+KicjaXRqZkc8PJpXe9VkSXaIOaW+4rH623Z7m +2rI3It9y1DsGybwqxHd2DLuAH2gvcAnfdL8T1XoM0RgdGYohCQP1e3sSqXiS/S6l7/K Zj/h1FNA0CtPw9DR13RgiZ/ZNK/ZM9aGiyzNaYA9M+JqoBzO6ujM+Fhpf0GmwevLjqhc z+sw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.32.210 with SMTP id l18mr2529163oei.99.1355429070906; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:04:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.11.39 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:04:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> <83ip879b0j.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:04:30 +0100 Message-ID: From: Dani Moncayo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) >>> In case this is somehow due to a defect in the build I made [1], it >>> would be good that someone made and upload a build of the current >>> trunk, so that Drew could try it and see if the crashes happen then >>> too. >> >> Drew, if you're interested you can grab a build from today's trunk at >> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/3pgcb3iiy8s9irl/c171Xhsd99 > > Juanma, did you configure with "--enable-checking" ? > > I ask this because I configured with it, and IIUC, these backtraces > that Drew is getting are due to assertions which are enabled only if > Emacs was configured with that option. > > OTOH, I also passed "--no-opt" to the configure script, which perhaps > might make a difference too. Answering myself: yes, you used both of those options: In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2012-12-13 on ODIEONE Bzr revision: 111211 eggert@cs.ucla.edu-20121213021749-eyqqen0ewhn2hogq Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -IC:/Devel/emacs/build/include -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-type-limits -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-pointer-sign -Wdeclaration-after-statement --ldflags -LC:/Devel/emacs/build/lib' So, if Drew doesn't get this backtrace again, I guess that the problem is in my build (unless it was an error in code, fixed between your bzr revision and mine). But I don't know what I'm doing wrong... -- Dani Moncayo From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Dani Moncayo Cc: Juanma Barranquero , 13140@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.135548076118221 (code B ref 13140); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:26:02 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2012 10:26:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41922 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjSSu-0004jo-II for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:26:00 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:53591) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjSSr-0004jg-Qz for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:25:58 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.16]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MckDn-1TS49i0t5l-00Hxg0 for <13140@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:24:59 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2012 10:24:58 -0000 Received: from 62-47-53-23.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.53.23]) [62.47.53.23] by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 14 Dec 2012 11:24:58 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/9njVFIaz9Gg+w9WRt1fdMhN+rI7W5GtZU3Lh/OI odxS7+4dvStAxJ Message-ID: <50CAFE73.6070803@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:24:51 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> <83ip879b0j.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) > I ask this because I configured with it, and IIUC, these backtraces > that Drew is getting are due to assertions which are enabled only if > Emacs was configured with that option. Practically all backtraces Drew sent come from broken assertions. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 20 21:10:54 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2013 02:10:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42104 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx6qc-00028n-0Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:10:54 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:34661) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx6qa-00028h-NX for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:10:53 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx6pb-0001kb-HF for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:09:51 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:09:51 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 13153 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) merge 13140 13150 13153 From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13140@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.136158181528826 (code B ref 13140); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:11:02 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2013 01:10:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44937 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U93d0-0007Us-OF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:10:15 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:56862) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U93cy-0007Ul-MP for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:10:13 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U93ba-000489-L4; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:08:46 -0500 From: Glenn Morris References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> <1BED98CE8ED34517BA8C36952BCB46B1@us.oracle.com> X-Spook: S Key munitions bullion industrial espionage CBNRC Abbas X-Ran: @8#)L7Mgp_.f-tH>mBa@?cziV35`GbXVV9CG0NUubo$:)9}*gmzl@6T#61EcI0l|[`"bi7 X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:08:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1BED98CE8ED34517BA8C36952BCB46B1@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:56:05 -0800") Message-ID: <50mwuvj0pt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) AFAICS, nobody ever decoded this backtrace; so nothing can be done. From unknown Mon Jun 23 20:20:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Dani Moncayo Cc: Juanma Barranquero , 13140@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.139200771424051 (code B ref 13140); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:49:01 +0000 Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2014 04:48:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33475 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCinJ-0006Fq-MX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:48:33 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:33969) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCinH-0006Fj-UW for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:48:32 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCin2-0006Bl-VW; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:48:17 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> <755CFDAA584B42DFA09FE85FDD01C869@us.oracle.com> <83ip879b0j.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 20:47:03 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:04:30 +0100") Message-ID: <87sirra81k.fsf@building.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCin2-0006Bl-VW X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392612498.0772@SNdQu0kpftcwX+F/YOSMpA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Dani Moncayo writes: > Answering myself: yes, you used both of those options: > > In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) > of 2012-12-13 on ODIEONE > Bzr revision: 111211 eggert@cs.ucla.edu-20121213021749-eyqqen0ewhn2hogq > Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 > Configured using: > `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags > -IC:/Devel/emacs/build/include -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare > -Wno-type-limits -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-pointer-sign > -Wdeclaration-after-statement --ldflags -LC:/Devel/emacs/build/lib' > > So, if Drew doesn't get this backtrace again, I guess that the problem > is in my build (unless it was an error in code, fixed between your bzr > revision and mine). But I don't know what I'm doing wrong... This was a year ago, so I'm closing this bug because it's thought that it might be a build issue. Please reopen if still present. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 09 23:48:39 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2014 04:48:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33478 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCinP-0006GC-4r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:48:39 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:33977) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCinN-0006G5-KL for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:48:37 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCin9-0006Bu-8A for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:48:23 +0100 Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 20:47:09 -0800 Message-Id: <87r47ba81e.fsf@building.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #13140 X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCin9-0006Bu-8A X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392612504.31759@XB/oUnl+MbUZRxeKntVK8w X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) close 13140