From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 05 16:49:33 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2012 21:49:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55390 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgMqT-0003t7-0s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:49:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59605) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgMqQ-0003t0-Ua for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:49:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgMqG-0002GF-Sv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:49:21 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:47323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgMqG-0002GA-Q4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:49:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42721) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgMqE-0000U5-JM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:49:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgMqD-0002Eq-Hr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:49:18 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:51673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgMqD-0002Ek-9b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:49:17 -0500 Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qB5LnGEc009011 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 21:49:16 GMT Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB5LnF3D005168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 21:49:15 GMT Received: from abhmt116.oracle.com (abhmt116.oracle.com [141.146.116.68]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qB5LnFn4020772 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:49:15 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.8) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:49:14 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" To: Subject: 24.3.50; Using `ediff-buffers', get msg "Computing differences between foo.el and foo.el5820q37 ..." Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:49:13 -0800 Message-ID: <5E5872B357EC40368AA553A688053AD1@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac3TMl2sBMdv4vh3RAC3DTJyJjqubQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.7 (----) Based on the buffer names, the message should say: "Computing differences between foo.el and foo.el<2> ..." [Creating this report outside Emacs, because of bug #13041.] In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2012-12-03 on MS-W7-DANI Bzr revision: 111077 agustin.martin@hispalinux.es-20121203172342-ifsebjmhksk28qa9 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -Ic:/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.10/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.10/src -Ic:/emacs/libs/libpng-1.2.37-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/zlib-1.2.5 -Ic:/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libxml2-2.7.8-w32-bin/include/libxml2 -Ic:/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9-w32-bin/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libiconv-1.9.2-1-lib/include' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 08 21:49:55 2014 Received: (at 13091) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2014 02:49:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58564 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCKSw-0008UG-Rt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 21:49:55 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:42652) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCKSu-0008U6-9Y for 13091@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 21:49:52 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCKSf-00045f-W6; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 03:49:38 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#13091: 24.3.50; Using `ediff-buffers', get msg "Computing differences between foo.el and foo.el5820q37 ..." References: <5E5872B357EC40368AA553A688053AD1@us.oracle.com> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:48:27 -0800 In-Reply-To: <5E5872B357EC40368AA553A688053AD1@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:49:13 -0800") Message-ID: <87ppmxj91g.fsf@building.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCKSf-00045f-W6 X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392518978.66577@m2Fu2OWXC1bpb0CsZGPfrQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13091 Cc: 13091@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) "Drew Adams" writes: > Based on the buffer names, the message should say: > "Computing differences between foo.el and foo.el<2> ..." Mine says "Computing differences between ediff8521EBL and ediff8521RLR ..." when I run it on two random non-saved buffers. "Computing differences between files.el and ChangeLog ..." when running on two saved buffers. But, yeah, it would make more sense if it gave the buffer names instead of the temporary file names in this scenario, I guess. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 31 04:25:44 2021 Received: (at 13091) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2021 08:25:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32775 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lndF2-0000WK-2a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 04:25:44 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57362) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lndEz-0000W1-6P for 13091@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 04:25:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=M+v73ASi4iDt2enqahzQzNoq5/hl/Y2KdNhVxEf6SxI=; b=kLR8lG3YYUBViO/ypU1LFJdBOn Gdj/q2kQziFvFN97SQWna64TXVJ0Js5XIAT8YVtOX7NDnwnNW78dABqayfzQg1xW4yhwkYgmW/YoL QkYvcPtSXDENtrz9L4GyYsZuo66aJa0REVkIlrc9mR2G8jZXL9yKVinYpCAPEJujvEjk=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lndEq-0007QC-4e; Mon, 31 May 2021 10:25:34 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#13091: 24.3.50; Using `ediff-buffers', get msg "Computing differences between foo.el and foo.el5820q37 ..." References: <5E5872B357EC40368AA553A688053AD1@us.oracle.com> <87ppmxj91g.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Neneh Cherry's _Raw Like Sushi (1)_: "Bitch" Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 10:25:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ppmxj91g.fsf@building.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:48:27 -0800") Message-ID: <87r1hngvic.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > But, yeah, it would make more sense if it gave the buffer names instead > of the temporary file names in this scenario, I guess. I think the proper solution here is just to remove the messaging -- which is misleading when you're comparing unsaved buffers, and pretty pointless otherwise. So I've now done this in Emacs 28. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13091 Cc: 13091@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > But, yeah, it would make more sense if it gave the buffer names instead > of the temporary file names in this scenario, I guess. I think the proper solution here is just to remove the messaging -- which is misleading when you're comparing unsaved buffers, and pretty pointless otherwise. So I've now done this in Emacs 28. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 31 04:25:47 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2021 08:25:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32778 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lndF5-0000Wa-C1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 04:25:47 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lndF3-0000W9-KG for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 04:25:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BJpyFFrq8sKgcL3DrxrfZ1+vr656rbKVpTdNZep5hTc=; b=SECoH5awrcD2062L1LyTnrvstS iwb1k53yEtlVE6bQdTbeY2KYg54I8ABQIy5w78iW4N8/kqrotHvidh2k7l7Ck05R8liITYosWAafx +CB93a8ZIICqNpaAUj4qFtJnHCcSAaebMyfHA8FjO2+U8LNNPCz3Sy5TFV9+IYrMVS74=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lndEw-0007QU-4j for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 10:25:40 +0200 Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 10:25:37 +0200 Message-Id: <87pmx7gvi6.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #13091 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 13091 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 13091 28.1 quit From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:01:09 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator