GNU bug report logs - #13088
stack overflow while compiling

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#13088: closed (stack overflow while compiling)
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:11:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:27:13 +0100
with message-id <87a9qfibm6.fsf <at> pobox.com>
and subject line Re: bug#13088: stack overflow while compiling
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #13088,
regarding stack overflow while compiling
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
13088: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13088
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: rixed <at> happyleptic.org
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: stack overflow while compiling
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:31:30 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

This program tries to compile a long cond expression and fails quickly with
a stack overflow.

Of course this procedure was generated and a user is unlikely to write such a
long cond, but considering the simplicity of the expression I'm surprised that
the stack is so solicited.

Note that I tested with guile 2.0.6 and not the fresh new 2.0.7 but I haven't
noticed anything in the changelog regarding memory consumption.

[stack-overflow.scm (text/plain, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: 13088-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13088: stack overflow while compiling
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:27:13 +0100

Marking as done.
-- 
http://wingolog.org/

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.