Subject: bug#13077: guile: add repl-option for customized print

From: Daniel Hartwig <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:36:17 +0800

On 4 December 2012 14:39, Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email-masked]> wrote:
> () Daniel Hartwig <[email-masked]>
> () Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:34:52 +0800
>
>    patch that handles [...] *unspecified*
>
> Can ‘unspecified?’ (the procedure) be used?  I seem to recall people
> wanting to avoid using ‘*unspecified*’ (the unique object) a while back.

Could do.  Though the existing code uses *unspecified*, and changing
would be unrelated to the purpose of this patch.