From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13066@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.135454248730150 (code B ref -1); Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:49:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2012 13:48:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TfWNT-0007qE-15 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:48:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44542) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TfWNP-0007q5-JC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:48:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfWKx-0006sM-15 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:45:40 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:48779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfWKw-0006sI-UG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:45:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfWKs-0000ob-1R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:45:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfWKh-0006pW-DH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:45:25 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfWKh-0006pS-9p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:45:15 -0500 Received: from 253.240.accsnet.ne.jp ([202.220.240.253]:62293 helo=mongkok) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfWKg-0003VZ-LG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:45:15 -0500 From: Kenichi Handa Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:43:27 +0900 Message-ID: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) When I customize rmail-summary-window-size to some integer value (e.g. 10), M-x rmail-summary signals this error: Wrong type argument: stringp, nil This is with emacs-24 branch. This doesn't happen with Emacs 23, but I don't remember it happens with 24.1 and 24.2. The precise recipe: % emacs -Q M-x rmail RET M-x customize-variable RET rmail-summary-window-size ;; Then set it to 10, click [apply], type q, then type h In GNU Emacs 24.2.90.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2012-11-28 on mongkok Bzr revision: 108135 handa@gnu.org-20121128115844-3bprvblqksuw4xbg Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11103000 System Description: Linux Mint 13 Maya Important settings: value of $LC_MONETARY: ja_JP.UTF-8 value of $LC_NUMERIC: ja_JP.UTF-8 value of $LC_TIME: ja_JP.UTF-8 value of $LANG: ja_JP.utf8 value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=ibus locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Fundamental Minor modes in effect: display-time-mode: t tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t Recent input: M-x r m a i l M-x c u s t o i - v a r r m a i l - s u b u w i C-p C-e 1 o 0 q h C-x o C-x b * M e C-a C-SPC C-e M-w M-x r e p o r t Recent messages: Resetting customization items...done Creating customization setup...done To install your edits, invoke [State] and choose the Set operation Change the state of this item. Computing summary lines...690 rmail-summary: Wrong type argument: stringp, nil Mark set Scanning for dabbrevs...done user-error: No dynamic expansion for `rmail-summary-wi' found Quit Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort gnus-util mail-extr dabbrev emacsbug qp rmailkwd help-fns cus-edit cus-start cus-load wid-edit rmailmm message format-spec rfc822 mml mml-sec mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader mail-parse rfc2231 time sendmail rmail-spam-filter easymenu rmailsum rmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils time-date japan-util tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel x-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list newcomment lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev minibuffer loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty emacs) From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:45:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kenichi Handa Cc: 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.135455667218825 (code B ref 13066); Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:45:03 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2012 17:44:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51701 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfa4G-0004ta-5k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:44:32 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:48112) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfa4D-0004tS-RJ for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:44:31 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Dec 2012 17:42:04 -0000 Received: from 62-47-53-55.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.53.55]) [62.47.53.55] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 03 Dec 2012 18:42:04 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18MWexYO/gM/ZbBQoxNO3MrYkbnWMFsEkLUdZkT61 sk/uDUlQ+vJF54 Message-ID: <50BCE462.7040705@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:41:54 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > When I customize rmail-summary-window-size to some integer > value (e.g. 10), M-x rmail-summary signals this error: > > Wrong type argument: stringp, nil > > This is with emacs-24 branch. This doesn't happen with > Emacs 23, but I don't remember it happens with 24.1 and 24.2. > > The precise recipe: > % emacs -Q > M-x rmail RET > M-x customize-variable RET rmail-summary-window-size > ;; Then set it to 10, click [apply], type q, then type h [...] Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.2 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy [62.47.53.55 listed in combined.njabl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > When I customize rmail-summary-window-size to some integer > value (e.g. 10), M-x rmail-summary signals this error: > > Wrong type argument: stringp, nil > > This is with emacs-24 branch. This doesn't happen with > Emacs 23, but I don't remember it happens with 24.1 and 24.2. > > The precise recipe: > % emacs -Q > M-x rmail RET > M-x customize-variable RET rmail-summary-window-size > ;; Then set it to 10, click [apply], type q, then type h [...] Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.2 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy [62.47.53.55 listed in combined.njabl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4979] > When I customize rmail-summary-window-size to some integer > value (e.g. 10), M-x rmail-summary signals this error: > > Wrong type argument: stringp, nil > > This is with emacs-24 branch. This doesn't happen with > Emacs 23, but I don't remember it happens with 24.1 and 24.2. > > The precise recipe: > % emacs -Q > M-x rmail RET > M-x customize-variable RET rmail-summary-window-size > ;; Then set it to 10, click [apply], type q, then type h I can't reproduce that here. Can you post a backtrace, please. martin From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: martin rudalics Cc: Kenichi Handa , 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.135456383229566 (code B ref 13066); Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:44:01 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2012 19:43:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51895 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfbvj-0007go-Hb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:43:51 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:49730) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfbvh-0007gg-4t for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:43:50 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfbtI-0002Nj-R7; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:41:21 -0500 From: Glenn Morris References: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> <50BCE462.7040705@gmx.at> X-Spook: subversive [Hello to all my friends and fans in domestic X-Ran: HCo]M2~*RQ4a`zgTVvp%P?h(j7G^VS/M!-z0GzwL\a\,yQgoEZ-j9eitvJvg7{:gg},JPV X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:41:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <50BCE462.7040705@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:41:54 +0100") Message-ID: <2nk3sy53fj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) martin rudalics wrote: > I can't reproduce that here. Can you post a backtrace, please. Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil) set-buffer(nil) (if was-in-summary nil (if (and (one-window-p) pop-up-windows (not pop-up= -frames)) (progn (split-window (selected-window) rmail-summary-window-size)= (select-window (next-window (frame-first-window))) (rmail-pop-to-buffer su= mbuf) (if (not (eq sumbuf (window-buffer (frame-first-window)))) (delete-ot= her-windows))) (rmail-pop-to-buffer sumbuf)) (set-buffer rmail-buffer) (let= ((total rmail-total-messages)) (if (rmail-summary-displayed) (let ((window= (selected-window))) (save-excursion (unwind-protect (progn (rmail-pop-to-b= uffer rmail-summary-buffer) (let ... nil)) (select-window window)))) (save-= current-buffer (set-buffer rmail-summary-buffer) (let ((rmail-total-message= s total)) nil))) (rmail-maybe-display-summary)) (set-buffer rmail-summary-b= uffer)) (let (mesg was-in-summary sumbuf) (if (eq major-mode (quote rmail-summary= -mode)) (setq was-in-summary t)) (save-current-buffer (set-buffer rmail-buf= fer) (setq rmail-summary-buffer (rmail-new-summary-1 desc redo func args) s= umbuf rmail-summary-buffer mesg rmail-current-message)) (if was-in-summary = nil (if (and (one-window-p) pop-up-windows (not pop-up-frames)) (progn (spl= it-window (selected-window) rmail-summary-window-size) (select-window (next= -window (frame-first-window))) (rmail-pop-to-buffer sumbuf) (if (not (eq su= mbuf (window-buffer ...))) (delete-other-windows))) (rmail-pop-to-buffer su= mbuf)) (set-buffer rmail-buffer) (let ((total rmail-total-messages)) (if (r= mail-summary-displayed) (let ((window (selected-window))) (save-excursion (= unwind-protect (progn ... ...) (select-window window)))) (save-current-buff= er (set-buffer rmail-summary-buffer) (let ((rmail-total-messages total)) ni= l))) (rmail-maybe-display-summary)) (set-buffer rmail-summary-buffer)) (rma= il-summary-goto-msg mesg t t) (rmail-summary-construct-io-menu) (message "C= omputing summary lines...done")) rmail-new-summary("All" (rmail-summary) nil) rmail-summary() call-interactively(rmail-summary nil nil) From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 02:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: martin rudalics Cc: 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.13545876483067 (code B ref 13066); Tue, 04 Dec 2012 02:21:02 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2012 02:20:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52227 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfi7s-0000nQ-K0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:20:48 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:56138) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfi7q-0000nH-BK for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:20:47 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfi5U-0003Px-0g; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:18:20 -0500 From: Glenn Morris References: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> <50BCE462.7040705@gmx.at> <2nk3sy53fj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spook: Waco, Texas Chobetsu COSCO TWA cypherpunk condor beanpole X-Ran: 3pd_&ch!'0R,%`,?9n4SO|.2xwSN-LLW{ctJO]Eq2jn=I4U[3aWMRdz7Ap;-vY-}TGl3!8 X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:18:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2nk3sy53fj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:41:20 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) I think it's probably something to do with select-window selecting a buffer when it didn't before. At least it looks to me like the end of rmail-maybe-display-summary is changing buffer when in 24.2 it seems not to. I think this makes the problem go away. Other uses are unaffected AFAICS. *** lisp/mail/rmailsum.el 2012-10-12 01:01:50 +0000 --- lisp/mail/rmailsum.el 2012-12-04 02:10:21 +0000 *************** *** 428,434 **** ;; This is how rmail makes the summary buffer reappear. ;; We do this here to make the window the proper size. (rmail-select-summary nil) ! (set-buffer rmail-summary-buffer)) (rmail-summary-goto-msg mesg t t) (rmail-summary-construct-io-menu) (message "Computing summary lines...done"))) --- 428,434 ---- ;; This is how rmail makes the summary buffer reappear. ;; We do this here to make the window the proper size. (rmail-select-summary nil) ! (set-buffer sumbuf)) (rmail-summary-goto-msg mesg t t) (rmail-summary-construct-io-menu) (message "Computing summary lines...done"))) From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error References: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.13546282545111 (code B ref 13066); Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:38:01 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2012 13:37:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52559 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfsgn-0001KL-2c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 08:37:34 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:38600) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfsgk-0001KC-89 for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 08:37:31 -0500 Received: from 253.240.accsnet.ne.jp ([202.220.240.253]:53698 helo=mongkok) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfseL-0005Yw-1W; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 08:35:01 -0500 From: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: (message from Glenn Morris on Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:18:19 -0500) Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:33:09 +0900 Message-ID: <87y5he0woa.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) In article , Glenn Morris writes: > I think it's probably something to do with select-window selecting a > buffer when it didn't before. At least it looks to me like > the end of rmail-maybe-display-summary is changing buffer when in 24.2 > it seems not to. > I think this makes the problem go away. Other uses are unaffected AFAICS. Thank you. That patch surely solved the problem. --- Kenichi Handa handa@gnu.org > *** lisp/mail/rmailsum.el 2012-10-12 01:01:50 +0000 > --- lisp/mail/rmailsum.el 2012-12-04 02:10:21 +0000 > *************** > *** 428,434 **** > ;; This is how rmail makes the summary buffer reappear. > ;; We do this here to make the window the proper size. > (rmail-select-summary nil) > ! (set-buffer rmail-summary-buffer)) > (rmail-summary-goto-msg mesg t t) > (rmail-summary-construct-io-menu) > (message "Computing summary lines...done"))) > --- 428,434 ---- > ;; This is how rmail makes the summary buffer reappear. > ;; We do this here to make the window the proper size. > (rmail-select-summary nil) > ! (set-buffer sumbuf)) > (rmail-summary-goto-msg mesg t t) > (rmail-summary-construct-io-menu) > (message "Computing summary lines...done"))) From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.135463221810925 (code B ref 13066); Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:44:02 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2012 14:43:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52613 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tftik-0002qA-C0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:43:38 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:40169) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tftih-0002pz-Co for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:43:36 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Dec 2012 14:41:05 -0000 Received: from 62-47-48-231.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.48.231]) [62.47.48.231] by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 04 Dec 2012 15:41:05 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/ScylzFAbSa+OzRd+Ei1QjMUx2RzL/cEpEgjE70a BAogUz7tdE/Twy Message-ID: <50BDB5FA.2090705@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:36:10 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> <50BCE462.7040705@gmx.at> <2nk3sy53fj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I think it's probably something to do with select-window selecting a > buffer when it didn't before. At least it looks to me like > the end of rmail-maybe-display-summary is changing buffer when in 24.2 > it seems not to. [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.23 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.5 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I think it's probably something to do with select-window selecting a > buffer when it didn't before. At least it looks to me like > the end of rmail-maybe-display-summary is changing buffer when in 24.2 > it seems not to. [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.23 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) 1.5 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > I think it's probably something to do with select-window selecting a > buffer when it didn't before. At least it looks to me like > the end of rmail-maybe-display-summary is changing buffer when in 24.2 > it seems not to. `select-window' now always makes its window's buffer current. Earlier it didn't when the window was already selected. Maybe we should put this into NEWS as an incompatible change. > I think this makes the problem go away. Other uses are unaffected AFAICS. Please install this on the branch. I neither use rmail nor understand its treatment of windows. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 04 13:11:07 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2012 18:11:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53518 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TfwxX-0007yu-C6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:11:07 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:44896) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TfwxV-0007yn-Qq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:11:06 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfwv6-0001kg-2v for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:08:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:08:36 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 13066 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) close 13066 24.2.91 From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error References: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kenichi Handa Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.135479333413059 (code B ref 13066); Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:29:01 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2012 11:28:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56080 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgZdN-0003Oa-Sz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 06:28:54 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42948) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgZdM-0003OQ-6f for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 06:28:53 -0500 Received: from 253.240.accsnet.ne.jp ([202.220.240.253]:51381 helo=mongkok) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgZd8-0001O2-8T; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 06:28:38 -0500 From: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: <87y5he0woa.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Kenichi Handa on Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:33:09 +0900) Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:26:46 +0900 Message-ID: <87fw3jjua1.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) In article <87y5he0woa.fsf@gnu.org>, Kenichi Handa writes: > In article , Glenn Morris writes: > > I think it's probably something to do with select-window selecting a > > buffer when it didn't before. At least it looks to me like > > the end of rmail-maybe-display-summary is changing buffer when in 24.2 > > it seems not to. > > I think this makes the problem go away. Other uses are unaffected AFAICS. > Thank you. That patch surely solved the problem. Unfortunately, I found another similar problem. % emacs -Q M-x rmail RET M-x customize-variable RET rmail-summary-window-size ;; Then set it to 10, click [apply], type q, then type h, ;; and then type g (rmail-summary-get-new-mail). This causes the same error. The backtrace is this: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument numberp nil) zerop(nil) (or (zerop msg) (rmail-summary-goto-msg msg)) (let (msg) (save-current-buffer (set-buffer rmail-buffer) (rmail-get-new-mail file-name) (setq msg rmail-current-message)) (or (zerop msg) (rmail-summary-goto-msg msg))) rmail-summary-get-new-mail(nil) call-interactively(rmail-summary-get-new-mail nil nil) --- Kenichi Handa handa@gnu.org From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kenichi Handa Cc: martin rudalics , 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.13548273314169 (code B ref 13066); Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:56:02 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2012 20:55:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57312 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgiTf-000159-Kf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:55:28 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:52140) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgiTd-000152-4p for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:55:26 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgiTL-0006er-UL; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:55:07 -0500 From: Glenn Morris References: <87fw3jjua1.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: NWO SWAT embassy basement number key pipeline FBI Al-Qaeda X-Ran: zW8;qZ):/A;0k)+r^i]LOO%mZN_,*~7;=k*K?1dX06d (Kenichi Handa's message of "Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:26:46 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Kenichi Handa wrote: > % emacs -Q > M-x rmail RET > M-x customize-variable RET rmail-summary-window-size > ;; Then set it to 10, click [apply], type q, then type h, > ;; and then type g (rmail-summary-get-new-mail). > > This causes the same error. The backtrace is this: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument numberp nil) > zerop(nil) > (or (zerop msg) (rmail-summary-goto-msg msg)) > (let (msg) (save-current-buffer (set-buffer rmail-buffer) (rmail-get-new-mail file-name) (setq msg rmail-current-message)) (or (zerop msg) (rmail-summary-goto-msg msg))) > rmail-summary-get-new-mail(nil) > call-interactively(rmail-summary-get-new-mail nil nil) This is also because rmail-maybe-display-summary behaves differently to how it used to. When we enter rmail-maybe-display-summary: current-buffer = RMAIL selected-window = RMAIL summary When we get to the end of this function: (unwind-protect (progn ;; current-buffer = RMAIL (select-window window) ; -> RMAIL summary ;; In 24.2, RMAIL buffer still current. ;; In 24.2.90, RMAIL summary buffer is now current. (enlarge-window (- rmail-summary-window-size (window-height)))) (select-window selected))))) I think we could summarize the difference between 24.2 and 24.2.90 by using emacs -Q, then evaluating the following in scratch: (progn (message "1 : %s : %s" (current-buffer) (selected-window)) (set-buffer "*Messages*") (message "2 : %s : %s" (current-buffer) (setq window (selected-window))) (select-window window) (message "3 : %s : %s" (current-buffer) (setq window (selected-window)))) With 24.2, the result is: 1 : *scratch* : # 2 : *Messages* : # 3 : *Messages* : # With 24.2.90, it is: 1 : *scratch* : # 2 : *Messages* : # 3 : *scratch* : # From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kenichi Handa Cc: 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.13548303618771 (code B ref 13066); Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:46:01 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2012 21:46:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57396 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgjGa-0002HP-Qu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:46:01 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53005) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgjGY-0002HI-Fw for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:45:59 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgjGI-0005TK-I7; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:45:42 -0500 From: Glenn Morris References: <87fw3jjua1.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: AUTODIN MD4 basement freedom president BLU-114/B top X-Ran: D'm6UqAr.UBEeG&;ff|@f\h3wAkEg2c8o!z@SjM3e`:%qoc"'ADc_4KSyc;7~b/8f7;#H( X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:45:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:55:07 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Glenn Morris wrote: > This is also because rmail-maybe-display-summary behaves differently to > how it used to. I installed a fix for that to emacs-24. > (progn > (message "1 : %s : %s" (current-buffer) (selected-window)) > (set-buffer "*Messages*") > (message "2 : %s : %s" (current-buffer) (setq window > (selected-window))) > (select-window window) > (message "3 : %s : %s" (current-buffer) (setq window (selected-window)))) > > With 24.2, the result is: > > 1 : *scratch* : # > 2 : *Messages* : # > 3 : *Messages* : # > > With 24.2.90, it is: > > 1 : *scratch* : # > 2 : *Messages* : # > 3 : *scratch* : # I know select-window has always been documented to "make WINDOW's buffer current", but I wouldn't be surprised if this change causes issues in other places. So yes, maybe a NEWS entry might help a bit. From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: Kenichi Handa , 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.135487657818209 (code B ref 13066); Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:37:01 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2012 10:36:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57963 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgvI2-0004jc-BM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 05:36:18 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:32899) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgvI0-0004jV-G6 for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 05:36:17 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Dec 2012 10:35:56 -0000 Received: from 62-47-58-231.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.58.231]) [62.47.58.231] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 07 Dec 2012 11:35:56 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18weIUU21gwADWkQkb8BXs7rGDCTyV+YSp75MDI6j A8yvfjW0lOleFM Message-ID: <50C1C687.6030606@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 11:35:51 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87fw3jjua1.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I know select-window has always been documented to "make WINDOW's buffer > current", but I wouldn't be surprised if this change causes issues in > other places. I hoped any such issues would turn up earlier. [...] Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.2 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy [62.47.58.231 listed in combined.njabl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I know select-window has always been documented to "make WINDOW's buffer > current", but I wouldn't be surprised if this change causes issues in > other places. I hoped any such issues would turn up earlier. [...] Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) 2.2 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy [62.47.58.231 listed in combined.njabl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4999] > I know select-window has always been documented to "make WINDOW's buffer > current", but I wouldn't be surprised if this change causes issues in > other places. I hoped any such issues would turn up earlier. > So yes, maybe a NEWS entry might help a bit. I added one. martin From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error References: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.135488392832377 (code B ref 13066); Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:39:02 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2012 12:38:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58087 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgxCZ-0008Q9-TL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 07:38:48 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:40726) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgxCX-0008Q1-0J for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 07:38:46 -0500 Received: from 253.240.accsnet.ne.jp ([202.220.240.253]:64277 helo=mongkok) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgxCC-0004N9-Vy; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 07:38:25 -0500 From: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: (message from Glenn Morris on Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:45:42 -0500) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:36:26 +0900 Message-ID: <87hanyxcmt.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) In article , Glenn Morris writes: > > This is also because rmail-maybe-display-summary behaves differently to > > how it used to. > I installed a fix for that to emacs-24. Thank you. I confirmed the fix. By the way, it seems that rmail-maybe-display-summary should use window-resize instead of enlarge-window. Then we don't need the extra code for changing and restoring window and buffer. --- Kenichi Handa handa@gnu.org From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 11:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kenichi Handa Cc: Glenn Morris , 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.135496568318655 (code B ref 13066); Sat, 08 Dec 2012 11:22:01 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2012 11:21:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59901 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThITC-0004qq-VD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:21:23 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:53802) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThITA-0004qi-M6 for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:21:21 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Dec 2012 11:20:55 -0000 Received: from 62-47-55-242.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.55.242]) [62.47.55.242] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 08 Dec 2012 12:20:55 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18dCpF2ooAdcsCNDuWm3dWiGDoWcv2e9gsgPumOQk eAUJjZcRmeI1eS Message-ID: <50C32290.9040409@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 12:20:48 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> <87hanyxcmt.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87hanyxcmt.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) > By the way, it seems that rmail-maybe-display-summary should > use window-resize instead of enlarge-window. Then we don't > need the extra code for changing and restoring window and > buffer. Indeed. `enlarge-window' should be used only interactively. martin From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kenichi Handa Cc: Glenn Morris , 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.135669042112314 (code B ref 13066); Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:27:02 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2012 10:27:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ToX9Y-0003CY-CG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 05:27:00 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:59965) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ToX9U-0003CP-GO for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 05:26:58 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.34]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MgJFg-1TRtwj0ihy-00NiIl for <13066@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:26:03 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2012 10:26:03 -0000 Received: from 62-47-49-151.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.49.151]) [62.47.49.151] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 28 Dec 2012 11:26:03 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/jlvJSFk/jdmoR8gB5LScqTWk1DztEXz8tlBuobl 0lEqlx/WN2atfz Message-ID: <50DD73B5.2000602@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:25:57 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> <87hanyxcmt.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87hanyxcmt.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) > By the way, it seems that rmail-maybe-display-summary should > use window-resize instead of enlarge-window. Then we don't > need the extra code for changing and restoring window and > buffer. Done in revision#111359 on trunk. Please have a look. Thanks, martin From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error References: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: martin rudalics Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.13568568779548 (code B ref 13066); Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:42:02 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2012 08:41:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36621 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpESJ-0002Tw-J3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:41:16 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:39925) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpESG-0002To-VD for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:41:14 -0500 Received: from 253.240.accsnet.ne.jp ([202.220.240.253]:64959 helo=mongkok) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TpERE-0002N0-BB; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:40:08 -0500 From: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: <50DD73B5.2000602@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:25:57 +0100) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:37:52 +0900 Message-ID: <87mwww9bq7.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) In article <50DD73B5.2000602@gmx.at>, martin rudalics writes: > > By the way, it seems that rmail-maybe-display-summary should > > use window-resize instead of enlarge-window. Then we don't > > need the extra code for changing and restoring window and > > buffer. > Done in revision#111359 on trunk. Please have a look. It seems that the new code changed the logic. Now rmail-summary-window-size doesn't take effect. As I didn't customize rmail-redisplay-summary, its value is nil. And the new code handles rmail-summary-window-size only if its value is non-nil. (and rmail-summary-buffer (buffer-name rmail-summary-buffer) rmail-redisplay-summary ;; <--- !!! (setq window (display-buffer rmail-summary-buffer '(nil (reusable-frames . visible)))) rmail-summary-window-size (setq size (- rmail-summary-window-size (window-height window))) (window--resizable-p window size) (window-resize window size)))) --- Kenichi Handa handa@gnu.org From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 09:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kenichi Handa Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.135685979713787 (code B ref 13066); Sun, 30 Dec 2012 09:30:02 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2012 09:29:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36649 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpFDQ-0003aK-WB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:29:57 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:62355) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpFDO-0003aB-Po for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:29:55 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.28]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M3xZE-1SzCqG2Sck-00ragX for <13066@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 10:28:50 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Dec 2012 09:28:50 -0000 Received: from 62-47-61-197.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.61.197]) [62.47.61.197] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 30 Dec 2012 10:28:50 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19M/Xwa2fZM6aE0DEVRiYiWUCg6KLPAuLspmPWT5N P4fpS9qIeo3L0Q Message-ID: <50E0094A.1010500@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 10:28:42 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87mwww9bq7.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87mwww9bq7.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) > It seems that the new code changed the logic. Now > rmail-summary-window-size doesn't take effect. As I didn't > customize rmail-redisplay-summary, its value is nil. And > the new code handles rmail-summary-window-size only if its > value is non-nil. > > (and rmail-summary-buffer (buffer-name rmail-summary-buffer) > rmail-redisplay-summary ;; <--- !!! > (setq window > (display-buffer > rmail-summary-buffer '(nil (reusable-frames . visible)))) > rmail-summary-window-size > (setq size (- rmail-summary-window-size (window-height window))) > (window--resizable-p window size) > (window-resize window size)))) I obviously have no idea how this is supposed to work :-( We could replace the condition (when (and rmail-summary-buffer (buffer-name rmail-summary-buffer) rmail-redisplay-summary) in `rmail-maybe-display-summary' either by (when (and rmail-summary-buffer (buffer-name rmail-summary-buffer) (or rmail-redisplay-summary (get-buffer-window rmail-summary-buffer 0))) or by (when (and rmail-summary-buffer (buffer-name rmail-summary-buffer) (or rmail-redisplay-summary rmail-summary-window-size)) Both should work if the summary window was specially created for the summary. They won't work when the window got merely reused - but in that case resizing the window doesn't strike me as a good idea in the first place. Can you try them? If this doesn't help, can you please tell me when and why you want to resize the summary window and why you want to do that with `rmail-redisplay-summary' set to nil? I can obviously restore the old logic but would like to understand it first. Thanks, martin From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kenichi Handa Cc: 13066@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.135695389513789 (code B ref 13066); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:39:02 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2012 11:38:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37754 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpdh4-0003ZZ-3h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 06:38:14 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:49442) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpdgw-0003ZM-RL for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 06:38:07 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.10]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LnEix-1TNyxN1ZGv-00hNRp for <13066@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:36:52 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2012 11:36:52 -0000 Received: from 62-47-58-255.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.58.255]) [62.47.58.255] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 31 Dec 2012 12:36:52 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+uupQsw0WuahpIHDrQK4/xHWe28+f6qrCtLQmhWQ /XEVJ/CprxcpUP Message-ID: <50E178C9.7030800@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:36:41 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87mwww9bq7.fsf@gnu.org> <50E0094A.1010500@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <50E0094A.1010500@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) > I can obviously restore the old > logic but would like to understand it first. I hopefully restored the old logic now. Please have another try. Thanks, martin From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error References: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:47:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: rudalics@gmx.at Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 13066@debbugs.gnu.org, handa@gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.13571523819742 (code B ref 13066); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:47:03 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2013 18:46:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqTKW-0002X4-J0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:46:21 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]:35805) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqP20-0004CY-PA for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:10:58 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hq7so7123723wib.5 for <13066@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 06:09:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=O2JGIehqPKMV+K5Yp8L/XtD/2aqEIq/x3b6vk062/hY=; b=O/sC9Br2h43/3EtsKFQHLPl8CpRcTUqqdJCicfvBjvXMejYU4zGfxqJA9GEehOKcNL FSZiWuAPJZzLoOFFR0RtUHQuUvodm79SwIVZFjlxrOUysV12j/3juvDIcyxH/26jRIpW wNsO8/e0aphT6vyLmLLx/IvTIfjJuYHw9+LeqVg/NYPPaQj+WV78VNIkZJL+OUS+uii0 lY9Y+5eaqDnsZsBN/PooUkuzCmN8Di8WBfrj5qv5GkIy0JnCtJ+cLU+f9iCIg4QLNK+z gUZjzTQ4UaPz6kNpHmBdQIv4UBkGYc6rfdi1QoWBX1EctFJ8ve12lMq54YoM89LEhfTs ZtfA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.174.196 with SMTP id bu4mr72645881wjc.35.1357135774952; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 06:09:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.74.81 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 06:09:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:09:34 +0900 Message-ID: From: Kenichi Handa Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149331ac72afc04d24ecb39 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:46:20 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) --089e0149331ac72afc04d24ecb39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In article <50E0094A.1010500@gmx.at>, martin rudalics writes: > I obviously have no idea how this is supposed to work :-( > We could replace the condition > (when (and rmail-summary-buffer (buffer-name rmail-summary-buffer) > rmail-redisplay-summary) > in `rmail-maybe-display-summary' either by > (when (and rmail-summary-buffer (buffer-name rmail-summary-buffer) > (or rmail-redisplay-summary > (get-buffer-window rmail-summary-buffer 0))) > or by > (when (and rmail-summary-buffer (buffer-name rmail-summary-buffer) > (or rmail-redisplay-summary rmail-summary-window-size)) > Both should work if the summary window was specially created for the > summary. They won't work when the window got merely reused - but in > that case resizing the window doesn't strike me as a good idea in the > first place. Can you try them? I've just updated my working tree of Emacs from trunk and found that you have already committed a new patch. So, I tried it and confirmed that it worked well. Thank you!! > If this doesn't help, can you please tell me when and why you want to > resize the summary window and why you want to do that with > `rmail-redisplay-summary' set to nil? I can obviously restore the old > logic but would like to understand it first. My understanding of rmail-redisplay-summary is that when it is non-nil, rmail-summary-buffer is forced to be shown. For instance, when rmail-summary-buffer is buried and I change the current message in RMAIL buffer by typing p, rmail-summary-buffer pops up. As I don't want that behavior, I haven't customized rmail-redisplay-summary to t. What I want is that rmail-summary-buffer is shown in some window of the specified height when I type h in RMAIL buffer. --- Kenichi Handa handa@gnu.org --089e0149331ac72afc04d24ecb39 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In article <50E0094A.1010500@= gmx.at>, martin rudalics <ruda= lics@gmx.at> writes:

> I obviously have no idea how this i= s supposed to work :-(

> We could replace the condition

>=A0=A0=A0 (when (and rma= il-summary-buffer (buffer-name rmail-summary-buffer)
> =A0=A0=A0 =A0= =A0=A0=A0 rmail-redisplay-summary)

> in `rmail-maybe-display-summ= ary' either by

>=A0=A0=A0 (when (and rmail-summary-buffer (buffer-name rmail-summar= y-buffer)
> =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0=A0 (or rmail-redisplay-summary
>= ; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0(get-buffer-window rmail-summary-buffer 0)))
> or by

>=A0=A0=A0 (when (and rmail-summary-buffer (buffer-n= ame rmail-summary-buffer)
> =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0=A0 (or rmail-redisplay-summary rmail-summary-windo= w-size))

> Both should work if the summary window was specially c= reated for the
> summary.=A0 They won't work when the window got = merely reused - but in
> that case resizing the window doesn't strike me as a good idea in = the
> first place.=A0 Can you try them?

I've just updated = my working tree of Emacs from trunk and
found that you have already comm= itted a new patch.=A0 So, I
tried it and confirmed that it worked well.=A0 Thank you!!

> If t= his doesn't help, can you please tell me when and why you want to
&g= t; resize the summary window and why you want to do that with
> `rmai= l-redisplay-summary' set to nil?=A0 I can obviously restore the old
> logic but would like to understand it first.

My understanding o= f rmail-redisplay-summary is that when it
is non-nil, rmail-summary-buff= er is forced to be shown.=A0 For
instance, when rmail-summary-buffer is = buried and I change
the current message in RMAIL buffer by typing p,
rmail-summary-buffer po= ps up.=A0 As I don't want that
behavior, I haven't customized rm= ail-redisplay-summary to t.

What I want is that rmail-summary-buffer= is shown in some
window of the specified height when I type h in RMAIL
buffer.

---=
Kenichi Handa
handa@gnu.org
=
--089e0149331ac72afc04d24ecb39-- From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 07:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kenichi Handa Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 13066@debbugs.gnu.org, handa@gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.13572833079985 (code B ref 13066); Fri, 04 Jan 2013 07:09:01 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2013 07:08:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42541 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr1OD-0002az-CI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:08:26 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:49204) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr1O6-0002am-OJ for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:08:23 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.17]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M4lZj-1T62IT32C5-00z2Qt for <13066@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 08:08:12 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jan 2013 07:08:12 -0000 Received: from 62-47-57-118.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.57.118]) [62.47.57.118] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 04 Jan 2013 08:08:12 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19OIhJUax5Oju0RAddw1wMwuVX3+QAhKHDR1gUDi8 TBAAH5GmqinymB Message-ID: <50E67FD6.7060802@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 08:08:06 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) > My understanding of rmail-redisplay-summary is that when it > is non-nil, rmail-summary-buffer is forced to be shown. For > instance, when rmail-summary-buffer is buried and I change > the current message in RMAIL buffer by typing p, > rmail-summary-buffer pops up. As I don't want that > behavior, I haven't customized rmail-redisplay-summary to t. > > What I want is that rmail-summary-buffer is shown in some > window of the specified height when I type h in RMAIL > buffer. Do you sometimes type h to make sure that an already displayed summary buffer's window has the "right" size? Or do you use h always to make the summary buffer reappear on screen? martin From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error References: <87624js134.fsf@gnu.org> Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 06:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: martin rudalics Cc: ken1handa@gmail.com, 13066@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.13574524198254 (code B ref 13066); Sun, 06 Jan 2013 06:07:02 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2013 06:06:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46961 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrjNq-000295-Ll for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:06:59 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:43144) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrjNn-000290-Ow for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:06:56 -0500 Received: from 253.240.accsnet.ne.jp ([202.220.240.253]:52875 helo=mongkok) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrjNW-0003qp-02; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:06:38 -0500 From: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: <50E67FD6.7060802@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Fri, 04 Jan 2013 08:08:06 +0100) Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 15:04:30 +0900 Message-ID: <87bod26e4x.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) In article <50E67FD6.7060802@gmx.at>, martin rudalics writes: >> What I want is that rmail-summary-buffer is shown in some >> window of the specified height when I type h in RMAIL >> buffer. > Do you sometimes type h to make sure that an already displayed summary > buffer's window has the "right" size? I'm not sure. I usually do not change the height of summary buffer once shown. > Or do you use h always to make the summary buffer reappear > on screen? Yes, that's my usual case of typing h. --- Kenichi Handa handa@gnu.org From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:28:41 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 07:44:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kenichi Handa Cc: ken1handa@gmail.com, 13066@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.13575446311910 (code B ref 13066); Mon, 07 Jan 2013 07:44:03 +0000 Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2013 07:43:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33569 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ts7N8-0000Uk-EQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 02:43:51 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:60357) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ts7N1-0000UN-Mr for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 02:43:44 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.1]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Ltl5H-1StvYx3FRt-011BAP for <13066@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:43:34 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Jan 2013 07:43:34 -0000 Received: from 62-47-39-143.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.39.143]) [62.47.39.143] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 07 Jan 2013 08:43:34 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19mRVBDPTFm7c5Oc/XFo/213H0vmChCH9/Fp6QQAP o+Kv6sqPntKMdi Message-ID: <50EA7C9C.1090402@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:43:24 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87bod26e4x.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87bod26e4x.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) >> Or do you use h always to make the summary buffer reappear >> on screen? > > Yes, that's my usual case of typing h. Just in case you (or someone else) has an idea what `rmail-new-summary' in rmailsum.el is about: Could you please try to fix its doc-string? It's completely incomprehensible to me. Thanks, martin