Subject: Re: bug#13041: 24.2; diacritic-fold-search

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 19:48:47 +0200

> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:31:31 +0100
> From: martin rudalics <[email-masked]>
> CC: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], 
>  [email-masked]
> 
>  > My reading of the table in
>  >
>  >   http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr44/#Character_Decomposition_Mappings
>  >
>  > you should ignore any car of the list returned by
>  > get-char-code-property if it does not pass the characterp test (or
>  > those that do pass the symbolp test).  That is, the character #xff59
>  > should sort exactly like lower-case y.
> 
> That is, `wide' and `compat' are completely equivalent in this regard?

Yes.  They are all different forms of the same character, which should
all compare equal in this context.