From unknown Sun Jun 22 03:57:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13035: 24.2.90; Gnus nnmaildir no longer save marks Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 13035 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13035@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13542391645960 (code B ref -1); Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:33:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2012 01:32:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45796 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TeFTA-0001Y4-1Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:32:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58983) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TeFT8-0001Xy-PI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:32:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeFR9-0000HK-0a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:30:39 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:42578) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeFR8-0000HE-U0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:30:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeFR7-0003DV-OM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:30:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeFR5-0000Gq-Aq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:30:37 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:41833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeFR5-0000Gb-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:30:35 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id xa7so62084pbc.0 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:30:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=Q5cwE4ZAfVoyRfx4okQPkH43K6uaclVoML3FVDLiZoc=; b=Jl82yrdkMyz5lg3OJImrEUW8MbZQ5wVGDgrmeZjDmt6GbMP0kgdLTSfykc7ifaP8cC HWS+sQ1hrCBP4pQQbdAvsI5C2PUSe4o7Jw+91PGy/tfY1XMZypb+sTaMLH1ofWvE3BQY M824lxC3lM41I7yhqMaU8GAJi1zDprcPm6nvQXlBC7pBdv1lLKhZsRDbyjOXjYXqcc5X 8r5ZSyYrqKEJbiE2T9ANsJy+n3sa44NVtsjYHo3W77p9+Nw0oxAW4BrpFl2W/5ZV+alg Jq8cY1kZJfVhAVI+3vCubbqqA4LJ1Y2DqbXl3eAvo1wlWqARyO2qyzCthpM2KHzpppis NTiQ== Received: by 10.68.232.71 with SMTP id tm7mr969364pbc.118.1354239034110; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:30:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([119.255.41.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ni3sm2096386pbc.2.2012.11.29.17.30.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:30:32 -0800 (PST) From: Leo Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:30:22 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) I have also reported this here to gnus: http://debbugs.gnu.org/12999. Since upgraded to 24.2.90 I have found my previous working setup for maildirs stops working properly. It seems the nnmaildir backend no longer saves marks. Hope someone get around to fix it before releasing 24.3. BTW, I think gnus's versioning is more confusing than useful. It's been very difficult to discuss problems in Gnus by mentioning version 5.13. Maybe the one bundled in emacs should have the same version as emacs. Leo From unknown Sun Jun 22 03:57:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13035: 24.2.90; Gnus nnmaildir no longer save marks Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13035 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Cc: 13035@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13035-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13035.13542395776676 (code B ref 13035); Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 13035) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2012 01:39:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45801 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TeFZo-0001ja-Q7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:39:37 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:51896) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TeFZl-0001jP-8o; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:39:35 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TeFXi-0004Em-5P; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:37:26 -0500 From: Glenn Morris References: X-Spook: pre-emptive gamma JUWTF RSA BLU-114/B enigma mindwar X-Ran: W@Ym2HR6De)`o06uXM8$b^i>?5R>ox't&r]gBV<:w$Dln (Leo's message of "Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:30:22 +0800") Message-ID: <38vccnna5m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) reassign 12999 emacs,gnus reassign 13035 emacs,gnus merge 12999 13035 stop Leo wrote: > I have also reported this here to gnus: http://debbugs.gnu.org/12999. I don't see the point of reporting it again. From unknown Sun Jun 22 03:57:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13035: bug#12999: nnmaildir broken Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13035 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Cc: 12999@debbugs.gnu.org, 13035@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13035-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13035.135655342030930 (code B ref 13035); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:24:02 +0000 Received: (at 13035) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2012 20:23:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32834 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnxVs-00082o-44 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:23:40 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:37730) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnxVp-00082a-17; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:23:37 -0500 Received: from ip-90-20-179-93.dialup.ice.net ([93.179.20.90] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnxUz-00070k-Rx; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:22:46 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: X-Now-Playing: Winston Tong's _Theoretically Chinese_ Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:22:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:25:28 +0800") Message-ID: <8738yso965.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1TnxUz-00070k-Rx X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357158166.94058@EfRgokfUU4coJFlG0yvaVA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Leo writes: > I have just upgraded to emacs 24.2.90 and noticed that anything I do to > my nnmaildir groups is not saved. For example, if I mark all messages in > that group read and restart gnus, they re-appear as unread. I don't have nnmaildir installed, so I can't test this. Could you check whether nnmaildir-request-set-mark is called, and if so, what goes wrong? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen From unknown Sun Jun 22 03:57:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13035: bug#12999: nnmaildir broken Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 01:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13035 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 12999@debbugs.gnu.org, 13035@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13035-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13035.135657036924840 (code B ref 13035); Thu, 27 Dec 2012 01:07:02 +0000 Received: (at 13035) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2012 01:06:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32965 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1To1vF-0006Sb-AX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:06:09 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:35587) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1To1vC-0006SQ-IW; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:06:07 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id rp2so5065523pbb.29 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:05:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=uzH9OZqYdUxdvxqLfHWYqcLy92vr/IxMZ9AZcNWxjiQ=; b=qWKmbjZDBqGzq/G13soKBT+GVlqSNjFfFEtHMxAboGAgbTqkcjzU6q+6fdk2yeYsnb Tv4qbmNZt86xcYx27hK4tx4NciEMnULvXgEOhDf3CQnqeHr0piB7g91C7x3IDlaHnkkB wU1hl8omlPwa/rin9cwFE9VcZcCGhj85HapCD+n4RKtc4RH8wnQftOxPaovuTXbj/Nl5 Mnw4/96yEs6y7dIXaUMP2al3aRSA+Z0yHKQ9sMZnRfzb8pGChKlrlvaZLWHkmZtWweo9 AqsnyBlv203VYj/VuXJ77tsWGqJKOg4E1810GWu+F3EGak0NjF1wh75fUroljOtC/hYr bk7A== X-Received: by 10.68.236.2 with SMTP id uq2mr89658880pbc.55.1356570321108; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:05:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([119.255.41.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wh8sm16743009pbc.75.2012.12.26.17.05.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:05:20 -0800 (PST) From: Leo References: <8738yso965.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUKDAg1NjRWV1V9fnyg op/DxcLk5uP8/voi63ReAAAACXBIWXMAAAWJAAAFiQFtaJ36AAAAB3RJTUUH1goZAgAz00bgXgAA AeVJREFUKM9lk0Fz2jAQhQXJD3CCO70CmcC1YMtcWyTZ14Bl69xats4N9r6/3zWQBlodNKNPu/s0 b1cCQFuZGpfVVh3vAvBJolIXRkapSuoRUtIdFyo1Y5xSdlAj7OtvD1XnXxmWRi+eWgcxyCed1lVV B1CrKyujMoi+eLA5kU1SsjoHlW+nQjTtFxk4MXgrOxvIqzoTZR8XgPaLl419zgsMaSGFPiUOZCIh thsx5Xy9NsK8Kwf/JoQgMxcVJ301HKkcSWaT0O7FY056J4U9xcYfnmVXG4801lW6lqwu2nKFZoHC HuzvaTVndZ+LaRQgZdthXw1cpynEkLEwyFHXk/aIxNQ6QeooJuzPMB+wn+D7JJNsiCcVA13/A3h/ xE9J+WidpAwoYNmRFwyvSRhNVtsdaAewzZZP5uw82QL9+tyNfocyP0McAzICUr5Mk9RdIjWasUNx aIIt6NK4ZtXIMdfMQt3nuMAyWbLI4DqZ4xPq/ag8jPond4XU/cLuOgw6XCFX/YCUfcDAMMH58fD4 G9kDchwfqVefkBwup2uZM+Q4WhJt5jN3AxXCsaS2yXEDuWgS8VOzW0gFjhEPmLyFMKBFaLb1HRwc DiaKwx0EeTMRYnYPQRW3PP4HApvlMv0PttX5v/D6Aws3IOSEwzmLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:00:53 +0800 In-Reply-To: <8738yso965.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:22:42 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (OS X 10.8.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 2012-12-27 04:22 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > I don't have nnmaildir installed, so I can't test this. > > Could you check whether nnmaildir-request-set-mark is called, and if so, > what goes wrong? I have rebuilt my MAILDIRs (a bit of hassle but I need to get it done quickly) and the problem is gone. So I cannot reproduce it anymore. Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 27 09:06:51 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2012 14:06:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33389 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ToE6j-0002mr-TZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:06:50 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:52179) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ToE6f-0002mf-N3 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:06:47 -0500 Received: from ip-90-20-179-93.dialup.ice.net ([93.179.20.90] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ToE5m-0004Qe-TE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:05:51 +0100 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:05:47 +0100 Message-Id: <87y5gjegjo.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #12999 X-MailScanner-ID: 1ToE5m-0004Qe-TE X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357221951.8201@R440jXKdTnnkxHtCTTaJ2w X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) tags 12999 unreproducible close 12999