Subject: Re: bug#13021: 24.2.90; compile eval-after-load form

From: Juanma Barranquero <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:31:44 +0100

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Stefan Monnier
<[email-masked]> wrote:

> I think it should be a macro so you don't
> need to wrap the code in '(progn ...).
[...]
> IOW, I'm open to introducing a replacement for eval-after-load which
> would be a macro, but under another name.

That would be really nice.