Subject: Re: bug#13008: Invalid oct number convertion in string

From: [email-masked] (Ludovic Courtès)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:41:42 +0100

nalaginrut <[email-masked]> skribis:

> Now my question is, should we have octal-escapes? Is is impossible or
> not implemented yet?

Nothing’s impossible, but there are already several kinds of escapes,
most of which are standardized, so I don’t think we need another one.

Closing this as not-a-bug.

Thanks,
Ludo’.