Subject: bug#13000: 24.2.90; underwave doesn't look as good as other IDEs

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:19:20 +0200

> From: Juri Linkov <[email-masked]>
> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 01:54:28 +0200
> Cc: [email-masked]
> 
> One problem is how to handle the tty case.  On a tty frame
> underwave underlines and doesn't use the color attribute.
> So the question is what face condition to use to filter out
> displays where underwave is not supported.
> 
> The already supported condition ((supports :underline t))
> doesn't take into account the underwave attribute,
> and a similar condition ((supports :underline wave))
> is not implemented.

Implementing the missing condition should be easy.

> Thus the patch uses the condition ((class color) (min-colors 88))
> to find the displays that should use the old face definitions
> without underwave:

This will do the wrong thing on 256-color xterm, I think.