From unknown Tue Jun 24 20:52:02 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#12885 <12885@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#12885 <12885@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Highlighting of selected article broken Reply-To: bug#12885 <12885@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 03:52:02 +0000 retitle 12885 Highlighting of selected article broken reassign 12885 gnus submitter 12885 Romain Francoise severity 12885 important thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 14 12:45:34 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2012 17:45:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42485 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TYh1q-00012j-F5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:45:34 -0500 Received: from stringer.orebokech.com ([88.190.240.207]:32987) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TYh1n-00012Z-Ud for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:45:32 -0500 Received: from silenus.orebokech.com (silenus [192.168.1.4]) by stringer.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA546188064D for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:44:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by silenus.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 80B91A053F; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:44:54 +0100 (CET) From: Romain Francoise To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org (The Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys) Subject: Highlighting of selected article broken X-Debbugs-Version: 5.13 X-Debbugs-Package: gnus Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:44:54 +0100 Message-ID: <877gpo13l5.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Going from the version of Gnus included in Emacs 24.2 to the version currently in the emacs-24 branch exposes the following regression: selected articles are sometimes not highlighted properly, the `gnus-summary-selected' face gets applied to the wrong line in the summary, which is confusing. [...] Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.5 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Going from the version of Gnus included in Emacs 24.2 to the version currently in the emacs-24 branch exposes the following regression: selected articles are sometimes not highlighted properly, the `gnus-summary-selected' face gets applied to the wrong line in the summary, which is confusing. [...] Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.5 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] Going from the version of Gnus included in Emacs 24.2 to the version currently in the emacs-24 branch exposes the following regression: selected articles are sometimes not highlighted properly, the `gnus-summary-selected' face gets applied to the wrong line in the summary, which is confusing. This seems to happen only on articles which are part of a thread; standalone articles get highlighted properly. Also, on an article which hasn't been highlighted, doing `g' brings back the highlighting. Let me know if you need more info, it's kinda hard to describe. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 17 06:04:45 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2012 11:04:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50399 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZgCb-0004es-1C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 06:04:45 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:52253) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZgCZ-0004el-Qn for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 06:04:44 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id hz11so504933pad.3 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 03:03:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=nMAHhsEaxnx/9O7UhL0NkdrLhawZ0U/hrbwPhtckXbI=; b=zht97oYRJtEiVE3uZHR9tuq7RuvBMZcy5cYjW/EubhtpKdK/1L9vRL5JV+JrBfFPNB +9WVl0LkWTqUj7oUHnxV1x7qXRErPGjqWej2XHO4pq+Z3uNnoyvne0NIcE57Dmf40Tcn 9c1nwDg8/TnEO+vlkMMKf51jfpCb0yw4kPuS3JEh64YMUkuQ5OXjPk/CARth8tIjd+L5 tdpSR5Za7JmQgTwvTyqj8qOtUqE7v7DYhKp1G9Jd4MIj6YLb14Howp0a+yq51qbPiO2t cCfZrUaAne1DeK1RHJKMA9ItqdWnYHXzAElWdEBjFYK0/vWonQ8H2StL5TVcDZnmrZI3 /cTw== Received: by 10.68.218.97 with SMTP id pf1mr23128568pbc.96.1353150229268; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 03:03:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ulysses (cm198.gamma83.maxonline.com.sg. [202.156.83.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ay5sm2676726pab.1.2012.11.17.03.03.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 17 Nov 2012 03:03:48 -0800 (PST) From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: severity 12885 important Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 19:03:44 +0800 Message-ID: <877gpkmqy7.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) severity 12885 important thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 25 11:18:17 2012 Received: (at 12885) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2012 16:18:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TceuP-0002n3-Oy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:18:17 -0500 Received: from stringer.orebokech.com ([88.190.240.207]:58734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TceuN-0002mv-CQ for 12885@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:18:16 -0500 Received: from silenus.orebokech.com (silenus [192.168.1.4]) by stringer.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D20D1880399 for <12885@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:16:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by silenus.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 17E8AA021B; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:16:36 +0100 (CET) From: Romain Francoise To: 12885@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: More info Organization: orebokech dot com References: <877gpo13l5.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:16:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: (GNU bug Tracking System's message of "Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:46:01 +0000") Message-ID: <874nkd4pzv.fsf_-_@silenus.orebokech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12885 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) I tracked this down to `gnus-use-trees' being set: if I set it back to nil (the default), the highlighting problem goes away. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 25 08:37:11 2012 Received: (at 12885) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2012 13:37:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58814 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnUgt-0006D3-92 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 08:37:11 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:39365) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnUgm-0006Ca-6b for 12885@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 08:37:05 -0500 Received: from ip-90-20-179-93.dialup.ice.net ([93.179.20.90] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnUg1-0000Zd-El; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 14:36:14 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Romain Francoise Subject: Re: bug#12885: More info References: <877gpo13l5.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> <874nkd4pzv.fsf_-_@silenus.orebokech.com> X-Now-Playing: Winston Tong's _Theoretically Chinese_ Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 14:36:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874nkd4pzv.fsf_-_@silenus.orebokech.com> (Romain Francoise's message of "Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:16:36 +0100") Message-ID: <87obhib6et.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1TnUg1-0000Zd-El X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357047374.31817@xk8bXTAE3CumiP1ULVq51Q X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12885 Cc: 12885@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Romain Francoise writes: > I tracked this down to `gnus-use-trees' being set: if I set it back to nil > (the default), the highlighting problem goes away. I'm unable to reproduce this. I have `gnus-use-trees' set, but I can't see any difference in what's being highlighted. Do you have any other customisations in effect that may influence Gnus highlighting? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 28 10:17:19 2012 Received: (at 12885) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2012 15:17:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34935 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TobgV-0003O0-Bm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:17:19 -0500 Received: from stringer.orebokech.com ([88.190.240.207]:51404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TobgP-0003Nm-NW for 12885@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:17:18 -0500 Received: from silenus.orebokech.com (silenus [192.168.1.4]) by stringer.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43ACC188021B; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:16:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by silenus.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 22748A0699; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:16:19 +0100 (CET) From: Romain Francoise To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#12885: More info Organization: orebokech dot com References: <877gpo13l5.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> <874nkd4pzv.fsf_-_@silenus.orebokech.com> <87obhib6et.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:16:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87obhib6et.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 25 Dec 2012 14:36:10 +0100") Message-ID: <87a9synr5o.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12885 Cc: 12885@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Do you have any other customisations in effect that may influence Gnus > highlighting? I don't think so, but my configuration is huge and has accumulated some cruft over the last 12 years or so. So who knows... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 31 09:57:01 2012 Received: (at 12885) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2012 14:57:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38093 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpgnE-0000sf-Js for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:56:57 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:57208) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpgn0-0000sU-GW for 12885@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:56:33 -0500 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpgll-000515-Ps; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:55:13 +0100 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Romain Francoise Subject: Re: bug#12885: More info References: <877gpo13l5.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> <874nkd4pzv.fsf_-_@silenus.orebokech.com> <87obhib6et.fsf@gnus.org> <87a9synr5o.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> X-Now-Playing: Franklin Bruno's _A Bedroom Community_: "Great Fool" Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:55:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a9synr5o.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> (Romain Francoise's message of "Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:16:19 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1Tpgll-000515-Ps X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357570514.02714@z+L2MeMyNXaTgPuaEDsp5A X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12885 Cc: 12885@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Romain Francoise writes: > I don't think so, but my configuration is huge and has accumulated some > cruft over the last 12 years or so. So who knows... Could you include a screenshot of what it looks like when it highlights the wrong thing? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 06 12:01:07 2013 Received: (at 12885) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jul 2013 16:01:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34778 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UvUv4-0005NT-FW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:01:06 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:38422) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UvUux-0005JT-Nr for 12885@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:01:03 -0400 Received: from 46.157.223.218.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.157.223.218] helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UvUuk-0002Ey-Fc; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 18:00:46 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Romain Francoise Subject: Re: bug#12885: More info References: <877gpo13l5.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> <874nkd4pzv.fsf_-_@silenus.orebokech.com> <87obhib6et.fsf@gnus.org> <87a9synr5o.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 18:00:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:55:13 +0100") Message-ID: <87ehbby8yl.fsf@building.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1UvUuk-0002Ey-Fc X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1373731246.65755@R9ED+S8r3B9cc710Ms1mEQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12885 Cc: 12885@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Could you include a screenshot of what it looks like when it highlights > the wrong thing? I'm closing this bug report due to inactivity for a few months. Please reopen if you have more information. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 06 12:01:06 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jul 2013 16:01:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34776 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UvUv3-0005ND-Hz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:01:05 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:38428) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UvUv0-0005LL-EJ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:01:02 -0400 Received: from 46.157.223.218.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.157.223.218] helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UvUup-0002FE-Lc for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 18:00:51 +0200 Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 18:00:42 +0200 Message-Id: <87d2qvy8yd.fsf@building.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #12885 X-MailScanner-ID: 1UvUup-0002FE-Lc X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1373731252.24672@wocW0OTQhNo2hRrSITTfDQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) close 12885 From unknown Tue Jun 24 20:52:02 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator