From unknown Fri Sep 12 09:56:18 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#12854 <12854@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#12854 <12854@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.2.50; `display-buffer-alist': conditions are not handled as documented Reply-To: bug#12854 <12854@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 16:56:18 +0000 retitle 12854 24.2.50; `display-buffer-alist': conditions are not handled a= s documented reassign 12854 emacs submitter 12854 michael_heerdegen@web.de severity 12854 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 10 14:18:34 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2012 19:18:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXGZe-0005xS-CJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:18:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55436) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXGZb-0005xF-1i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:18:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXGZJ-0003eI-MP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:18:16 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:52614) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXGZJ-0003eC-JD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:18:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXGZG-0007lz-FR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:18:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXGZD-0003bs-CY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:18:10 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:49294) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXGZD-0003bX-1x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:18:07 -0500 Received: from drachen.dragon ([89.204.137.109]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZDTE-1Tld5M3tZE-00LTwa for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:18:05 +0100 From: Michael Heerdegen To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.2.50; `display-buffer-alist': conditions are not handled as documented Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:18:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9upp8qb.fsf@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:t1ocTk8M9N2H/adhtXSVbwY86WweFY7EohGjIc0eiCw GhRA9IuKxDjQZhpSQhiwQfBFsrae/0hwcz/tGlZLUQZW7Z59H8 hSW0svbQ0npLmHeSJtefn61aLMpobLbiOcHb98OcMMO50rOD1J 9wZqQjwWctpGnyinflosBi+e73iDdF2fE9tXiOhX01YeSEFv/Z a+pb15iOInNxutlqyEbZITDxarYdU+SPacsCznbcNk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: michael_heerdegen@web.de List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) Hi, The doc says: > display-buffer-alist is a variable defined in `window.el'. > [...] > > Alist of conditional actions for `display-buffer'. > This is a list of elements (CONDITION . ACTION), where: > > CONDITION is either a regexp matching buffer names, or a function > that takes a buffer and returns a boolean. But the CONDITION is handled very differently by `display-buffer-assq-regexp': (defun display-buffer-assq-regexp (buffer-name alist) "Retrieve ALIST entry corresponding to BUFFER-NAME." (catch 'match (dolist (entry alist) (let ((key (car entry))) (when (or (and (stringp key) (string-match-p key buffer-name)) (and (symbolp key) (functionp key) (funcall key buffer-name alist))) (throw 'match (cdr entry))))))) Obviously, two things are wrong here: (1) If CONDITION is a function, it currently must be a symbol. I don't see why lambda expressions should be forbidden. The user should not need to use defun only to be able specify an argument. (2) If CONDITION is a function, it takes _two_ arguments: a buffer _name_ (not a buffer) _and_ an alist. That should be clarified in the docstring. Regards, Michael. In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2012-11-01 on dex, modified by Debian (emacs-snapshot package, version 2:20121101-1) Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10707000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux testing (wheezy) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 10 14:42:16 2012 Received: (at 12854) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2012 19:42:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60014 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXGwa-0006Wg-EO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:42:16 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:50623) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXGwX-0006WY-Qu for 12854@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:42:14 -0500 Received: from drachen.dragon ([89.204.137.109]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lpw63-1SsAte2Lot-00fmDb; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:41:58 +0100 From: Michael Heerdegen To: 12854@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#12854: 24.2.50; `display-buffer-alist': conditions are not handled as documented References: <87a9upp8qb.fsf@web.de> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:42:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a9upp8qb.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:18:36 +0100") Message-ID: <87ip9d1byy.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:45juLPiu6abaQsi9kd8S1aWeYRDAcsjjnM8COS5WWuJ zGN7duHc8h5vvMM95J43ueQgTp0o2sBOU/Bz+N6/GS9x/E+HPC B9x8DyGSo12EyX3pr7hS2tcdr1cX4GVNGdxmsHU50Fnch/4UHv RnCamH3GjbgaLbITuR35ti0Mbnqvwf6AWEqaGuTeHRIEUxWK6t O3ctmTit8Ap3906/HxgqpWcLxfk5ztFmcQqWNJos6Y= X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Hi, > > The doc says: > > > display-buffer-alist is a variable defined in `window.el'. > > [...] > > > > Alist of conditional actions for `display-buffer'. > > This is a list of elements (CONDITION . ACTION), where: > > > > CONDITION is either a regexp matching buffer names, or a function > > that takes a buffer and returns a boolean. [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [89.204.137.109 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael_heerdegen[at]web.de) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.15.4 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12854 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Hi, > > The doc says: > > > display-buffer-alist is a variable defined in `window.el'. > > [...] > > > > Alist of conditional actions for `display-buffer'. > > This is a list of elements (CONDITION . ACTION), where: > > > > CONDITION is either a regexp matching buffer names, or a function > > that takes a buffer and returns a boolean. [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [89.204.137.109 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.15.4 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael_heerdegen[at]web.de) -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4992] Michael Heerdegen writes: > Hi, > > The doc says: > > > display-buffer-alist is a variable defined in `window.el'. > > [...] > > > > Alist of conditional actions for `display-buffer'. > > This is a list of elements (CONDITION . ACTION), where: > > > > CONDITION is either a regexp matching buffer names, or a function > > that takes a buffer and returns a boolean. And please, also add to the docstring that the CONDITIONS are tried one after another until one is fulfilled, and that all other entries are ignored, or something like that. Just for completeness. Thanks, Michael. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 13 08:51:38 2012 Received: (at 12854) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2012 13:51:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37964 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TYGtt-0006Fh-Gq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:51:37 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:39115) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TYGtq-0006FX-Dh for 12854@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:51:35 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2012 13:50:48 -0000 Received: from 62-47-46-229.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.46.229]) [62.47.46.229] by mail.gmx.net (mp041) with SMTP; 13 Nov 2012 14:50:48 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18HgNhNd/8HCIPWqYOIly7rMiztT6POag7f3AnQpD vX8KABRtyoSy63 Message-ID: <50A25036.8070008@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:50:46 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: michael_heerdegen@web.de Subject: Re: bug#12854: 24.2.50; `display-buffer-alist': conditions are not handled as documented References: <87a9upp8qb.fsf@web.de> In-Reply-To: <87a9upp8qb.fsf@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12854 Cc: 12854@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) > (defun display-buffer-assq-regexp (buffer-name alist) > "Retrieve ALIST entry corresponding to BUFFER-NAME." > (catch 'match > (dolist (entry alist) > (let ((key (car entry))) > (when (or (and (stringp key) > (string-match-p key buffer-name)) > (and (symbolp key) (functionp key) > (funcall key buffer-name alist))) > (throw 'match (cdr entry))))))) > > > Obviously, two things are wrong here: > > (1) If CONDITION is a function, it currently must be a symbol. I don't > see why lambda expressions should be forbidden. The user should not > need to use defun only to be able specify an argument. I see no problems with removing the (symbolp key) check. > (2) If CONDITION is a function, it takes _two_ arguments: a buffer > _name_ (not a buffer) _and_ an alist. That should be clarified in the > docstring. IIUC the correct solution is to not pass ALIST to the function specified by `key'. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 16 10:33:47 2012 Received: (at 12854-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2012 15:33:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48403 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZNvP-0003fU-MC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:33:47 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:38379) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZNvO-0003fN-4a for 12854-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:33:46 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2012 15:32:58 -0000 Received: from 62-47-58-235.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.58.235]) [62.47.58.235] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 16 Nov 2012 16:32:58 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+yq91IEYSyF+iU0sQtfct0Rv1GTZRGkFsiPLHvA2 dxMizquhePB03+ Message-ID: <50A65CA3.5070701@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:32:51 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 12854-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#12854: 24.2.50; `display-buffer-alist': conditions are not handled as documented References: <87a9upp8qb.fsf@web.de> In-Reply-To: <87a9upp8qb.fsf@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12854-done Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) > Obviously, two things are wrong here: > > (1) If CONDITION is a function, it currently must be a symbol. I don't > see why lambda expressions should be forbidden. The user should not > need to use defun only to be able specify an argument. I lifted this restriction in revision 110885 on the Emacs-24 release branch. > (2) If CONDITION is a function, it takes _two_ arguments: a buffer > _name_ (not a buffer) _and_ an alist. That should be clarified in the > docstring. As a matter of fact, the code called that function with the variable `display-buffer-alist' as second argument which doesn't make any sense. I now pass it the ACTION argument of `display-buffer' instead and tried to document this in the same revision as above. Thanks, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 16 10:34:22 2012 Received: (at 12854) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2012 15:34:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZNvx-0003hE-UB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:34:22 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:37874) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZNvv-0003h7-FM for 12854@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:34:20 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2012 15:33:22 -0000 Received: from 62-47-58-235.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.58.235]) [62.47.58.235] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 16 Nov 2012 16:33:22 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX198o0pyCTV8I3wYgG0obUifAn19RQvciJNaMngFBf HN4C521Rz0pfq8 Message-ID: <50A65CBA.60705@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:33:14 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#12854: 24.2.50; `display-buffer-alist': conditions are not handled as documented References: <87a9upp8qb.fsf@web.de> <87ip9d1byy.fsf@web.de> In-Reply-To: <87ip9d1byy.fsf@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12854 Cc: 12854@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) > And please, also add to the docstring that the CONDITIONS are tried one > after another until one is fulfilled, and that all other entries are > ignored, or something like that. Just for completeness. Hmm... I tried to do that in revision 110885. Please have a look. Thanks again, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 17 20:01:18 2012 Received: (at 12854) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2012 01:01:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51621 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZtG8-0001jv-H9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:01:18 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:60640) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZtG5-0001jn-JS for 12854@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:01:15 -0500 Received: from drachen.dragon ([82.113.121.80]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MZUnl-1TqkF325DZ-00LPdD; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:00:17 +0100 From: Michael Heerdegen To: 12854@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#12854: 24.2.50; `display-buffer-alist': conditions are not handled as documented References: <87a9upp8qb.fsf@web.de> <50A65CA3.5070701@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:00:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <50A65CA3.5070701@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:32:51 +0100") Message-ID: <876253u3ll.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:lnZIlsyDwwQtjPWzM5eNmti6FLUpu8MRMf2WRjEbmmW +2R0kHqSbSx2IjAgBqP61tGaMY4WFKQ+nU4oz30jIQ1+OtUC22 IXpiqg2ms4yudiiUq8Idk61vUE/ITRP1T/RIS6rBTucWT7zKDO vg82hgGi79mYrwnmxXPGVldHVLA5i3PM9VBLo68Z0iBN1Wm937 cR1xRzRShS0mNT8wXhoTQjT86ZQCJS7qstYRXjBjj0= X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12854 Cc: rudalics@gmx.at X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) martin rudalics writes: > > (1) If CONDITION is a function, it currently must be a symbol. I don't > > see why lambda expressions should be forbidden. The user should not > > need to use defun only to be able specify an argument. > > I lifted this restriction in revision 110885 on the Emacs-24 release > branch. Ok, thanks. My stuff works now as it's supposed to. > > (2) If CONDITION is a function, it takes _two_ arguments: a buffer > > _name_ (not a buffer) _and_ an alist. That should be clarified in the > > docstring. > > As a matter of fact, the code called that function with the variable > `display-buffer-alist' as second argument which doesn't make any sense. > I now pass it the ACTION argument of `display-buffer' instead and tried > to document this in the same revision as above. Looks ok to me, the code as well as the doc. Thanks, Michael. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 17 20:02:40 2012 Received: (at 12854) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2012 01:02:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZtHU-0001ls-I6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:02:40 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:60533) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZtHS-0001ll-16 for 12854@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:02:38 -0500 Received: from drachen.dragon ([82.113.121.80]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LqUXd-1T5UG42pv7-00e5wI; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:01:42 +0100 From: Michael Heerdegen To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#12854: 24.2.50; `display-buffer-alist': conditions are not handled as documented References: <87a9upp8qb.fsf@web.de> <87ip9d1byy.fsf@web.de> <50A65CBA.60705@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:02:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <50A65CBA.60705@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:33:14 +0100") Message-ID: <871ufru3j8.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Z7c4PXtS6xDNgnJWe2Nfwmz31L71ONNrKNQsqZWWKmq KUbvr4Vr9KOfTWl3wz30CNlDHijlF2/6rFbz5YSrGRCy7w3Dry cd5h6LtijQN7C1teX9pEvFluGOkY631XB/w8kkCkyP56r5bSQZ WjzsesQPtafJ7KLIdS47PsaLSs+6GxVpdy+Wya2JYWMEpUfQRx m5h+RXjRE+N7xEIlzZD1I2RNG45hlzWwZSXN1k6Oik= X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12854 Cc: 12854@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) martin rudalics writes: > > And please, also add to the docstring that the CONDITIONS are tried one > > after another until one is fulfilled, and that all other entries are > > ignored, or something like that. Just for completeness. > > Hmm... I tried to do that in revision 110885. Please have a look. Looks also ok to me, thanks! Regards, Michael. From unknown Fri Sep 12 09:56:18 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator