From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 07 11:17:18 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2012 16:17:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54631 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TW8JZ-000511-W6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:17:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40271) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TW8JY-00050u-0z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:17:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TW8JV-000205-Bk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:17:19 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, GAPPY_SUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:46075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TW8JV-000201-7t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:17:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40525) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TW8JU-0006Wi-Ap for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:17:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TW8JQ-0001yx-CQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:17:12 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.219.41]:64636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TW8JP-0001yr-Uf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:17:08 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id k14so2051681oag.0 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:17:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EM5KPhZjbLcstUaBmGNFDsMFvSRjLJR28KW+QoM/KAc=; b=BnTIumMlIJjLFucX2TliULEkKy/8qCg6s4HVsY8JXisKtNq47c6Kts2XWMuTm26ypM IsUMH90x6yHv19LEyoeL2dXsoVGwF72EAxwlTPpo1odsNqpoE/KFQx4bf/xhw97gadKs Fsthzy+dv0CIrb3xid2zc/E+g5Wz/4TZM/Pc/l6WfjKwLm++jVaLgbatGU0K+EJjxSU8 oDyxdxnxoU7+wQ4LXS0bo9SAyJrm8qPx/caofjpfNCMwImpUewmJ1/hKtx9Ge1OhMY42 yBMal9i6fNzfVd5Da+ZWF93UwmTQvi/7E5kUvh3XbbeNUukaBG/PECtZ9KZXllU6npuW bAFQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.170.233 with SMTP id ap9mr2409612oec.31.1352305027324; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:17:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:17:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:17:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: 24.2.50; Strange default string brought by M-n after `C-x C-v' From: Dani Moncayo To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Recipe from "emacs -Q": C-x b h i / * h e l l o C-x C-v M-n I observe that `M-n' writes in the minibuffer a default argument "c:/*hello". If I repeat the experiment changing "/*hello" with, for example, "hello" or "/*hello/", no default argument is brought by `M-n'. Is this a bug no? If not, what is the rule here for getting a default argument? TIA. In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7601) of 2012-10-29 on DANI-PC Bzr revision: 110729 dancol@dancol.org-20121029172429-z2gio8grvel4rzrv Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -I../../libs/libxpm-3.5.8/include -I../../libs/libxpm-3.5.8/src -I../../libs/libpng-1.4.10 -I../../libs/zlib-1.2.6 -I../../libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include -I../../libs/jpeg-6b-4/include -I../../libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include -I../../libs/libxml2-2.7.8-w32-bin/include/libxml2 -I../../libs/gnutls-3.0.16/include -I../../libs/libiconv-1.14-2-mingw32-dev/include' Important settings: value of $LANG: ESN locale-coding-system: cp1252 default enable-multibyte-characters: t -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 08 02:43:12 2012 Received: (at 12824) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2012 07:43:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55294 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWMlb-0003lr-VK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 02:43:12 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33571) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWMlZ-0003lk-0J for 12824@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 02:43:09 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWMlW-0002vl-UB; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 02:43:06 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#12824: 24.2.50; Strange default string brought by M-n after `C-x C-v' References: X-Spook: ammunition airframe assassinate basement USDOJ Rand X-Ran: h_4$qszx-xEjze).)N@Yf\A!A#>/uY,pUQq(Y;:H5B9kE/.d@XAiDt@9h),2;"A-{rE9bG X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 02:43:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:17:07 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12824 Cc: 12824@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Dani Moncayo wrote: > Is this a bug no? If not, what is the rule here for getting a default > argument? It's just a guess, supplied by ffap-file-at-point. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 08 03:07:23 2012 Received: (at 12824) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2012 08:07:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55321 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWN91-0004KG-Dj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 03:07:23 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:50379) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWN8z-0004K9-E6 for 12824@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 03:07:22 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id v19so2387897obq.3 for <12824@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:07:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LJfNmD6M9RwLxLNzTZKd1w108D9gMwCBGpQ9KJ+1GwE=; b=MHp09DhozG4ZyZLucgRNjKBLWcX61R+6brpIvOd/bxyOrEq7N2MEgdqynWnUlwgHuK OtYkwhI3buYHCJ7P+R6p4BLpz+sOxjpjxxPlE4hmMdgCSj/xsNk8jiqK7Hdj99WPJIgj gc2VUBqT8KhraYr62F8BpX67CsDjFvQ2XvoXpeHAb6wGb/fL4GSxksceG4GrZVxrrZAm yMV3emEBROA+VXuPJCvnKEdAFU3O0mcrYHXB8YY/71J/JFCy+yKSLakHPaRpRj2wN75M uJk8JifqCHloCAvgKT+3jMgnRipFC+Zz7Z7gLsT3HvAFpsgbFaZlnVJvOmv4scZvYxz+ DGxQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.170.233 with SMTP id ap9mr4165503oec.31.1352362039417; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:07:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:07:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 09:07:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12824: 24.2.50; Strange default string brought by M-n after `C-x C-v' From: Dani Moncayo To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> Is this a bug no? If not, what is the rule here for getting a default >> argument? > > It's just a guess, supplied by ffap-file-at-point. Well, I don't know how that function works, but I find the current behavior annoying. [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dmoncayo[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.214.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 2.0 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12824 Cc: 12824@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> Is this a bug no? If not, what is the rule here for getting a default >> argument? > > It's just a guess, supplied by ffap-file-at-point. Well, I don't know how that function works, but I find the current behavior annoying. [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dmoncayo[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.214.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 2.0 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid >> Is this a bug no? If not, what is the rule here for getting a default >> argument? > > It's just a guess, supplied by ffap-file-at-point. Well, I don't know how that function works, but I find the current behavior annoying. This is how I hit this bug: sometimes I open a C file, which begins with a comment header at the very beginning of the file, like this: /******************* * blah blah blah... **********************/ and when I open the file, I realize that that is not the file I want to visit, and then intuitively I do "C-x C-v M-n". Then I found quite strange the "X:/*******************" I see in the minibuffer. -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 08 03:18:26 2012 Received: (at 12824) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2012 08:18:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55329 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWNJi-0004Zw-G2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 03:18:26 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:35125) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWNJg-0004Zo-7i for 12824@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 03:18:24 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWNJe-0002o0-TX; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 03:18:22 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#12824: 24.2.50; Strange default string brought by M-n after `C-x C-v' References: X-Spook: eavesdropping number key UMTS crypto anarchy constitution X-Ran: pN@d`&:[l\,VD^Xc3tCihAK5q&SBf[tgRZ8y5&7w,([XJaTG({GA2=`R4L$29l=s7df (Dani Moncayo's message of "Thu, 8 Nov 2012 09:07:19 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12824 Cc: 12824@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Dani Moncayo wrote: > Well, I don't know how that function works, but I find the current > behavior annoying. Probably you can set file-name-at-point-functions to nil to disable it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 08 11:50:28 2012 Received: (at 12824-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2012 16:50:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56319 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWVJE-0000IX-5L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:50:28 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:33810) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWVJB-0000IM-UH for 12824-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:50:26 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so2846626oag.3 for <12824-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:50:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wExDXbiOzcfjbX4q2EKy48g09xGGiRyDT0XdXy0bbAA=; b=vE8fBP0jcgfNfVsg+b6Tx4QAov72v2CZ8hmvUlRpWVoUw14QeESH8JKYFX8DMEVTmr mphoD4BU++IeuvkHS3FzzcGGG5QP3Krwv1Z2v/RLeZn/l8lWnKANgyroveWyGawywSkZ W/QRsjT8F0W6jk+aqzqqyEMafuQoSMQGk0rhR/HNYmHiT3UoyKHoLaxQUwwZTJuilPzO DEG06EQ/0QobUjx4kbtHC/2u1AVjlArxr3roe40UdHvYUBdyqXMymvJyaQc3qJ4tSgrU w17VOcdkrbqn8aV23OyGu1NsJokQsstND6RVGTCSX3a+eNKtszARQs2HKuwJ1V0wIMAv /95w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.21.142 with SMTP id v14mr6212980obe.46.1352393422984; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:50:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 08:50:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 17:50:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12824: 24.2.50; Strange default string brought by M-n after `C-x C-v' From: Dani Moncayo To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> Well, I don't know how that function works, but I find the current >> behavior annoying. > > Probably you can set file-name-at-point-functions to nil to disable it. Ok, so my case is is a false positive. [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dmoncayo[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.219.44 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 2.0 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12824-done Cc: 12824-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> Well, I don't know how that function works, but I find the current >> behavior annoying. > > Probably you can set file-name-at-point-functions to nil to disable it. Ok, so my case is is a false positive. [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.219.44 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dmoncayo[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 2.0 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid >> Well, I don't know how that function works, but I find the current >> behavior annoying. > > Probably you can set file-name-at-point-functions to nil to disable it. Ok, so my case is is a false positive. Let's close this bug, then. Thank you. -- Dani Moncayo From unknown Tue Aug 19 21:02:06 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator