Subject: bug#12823: Invalid font name

From: Kenichi Handa <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:21:00 +0900

In article <[email-masked]>, Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]> writes:

> > If we don't have that name first in the list, we must have another
> > index specifying which name is a valid face attribute value, or must
> > have another tables that map numeric values of font spec to face
> > attribute values.

> My understanding is that this issue is only related to whether or not
> `semi-condensed' is in the list, but is unrelated to whether it comes
> before or after `semicondensed' in the list.

And, what is your opinion on "whether or not
`semi-condensed' is in the list"?

---
Kenichi Handa
[email-masked]