From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 05 14:57:40 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2012 19:57:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51044 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVSni-0003G9-VG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:57:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44894) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVSng-0003G2-OX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:57:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVSke-0001gE-SO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:54:29 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:41154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVSke-0001g4-Ne for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:54:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVSka-0001tc-QC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:54:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVSkW-0001Yn-CA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:54:24 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.219.41]:41683) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVSkW-0001YW-7M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:54:20 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id k14so6908211oag.0 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:54:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FgmbAu342gfO6KQRaPlB9fLrv47i0XQw6q5snt3z88c=; b=YyRmeEoMuJ/+FVShP6j2A1W8xb938Z3kH00D0QtuVEVPnwtWVlit177HU7kSM9UFru LGrFuKffLGR9zHbXBbzh2/YY52JKXSYbssEJMBC8QmSMsXuoU8Cfqt2bdiysESLzCzJ3 PepTMJBscU9lMV1cHjYDmUvzTnmrtXEplLbD+AwNyNgBTGfJmcGmLUhZGGtuAmO8BUUm KoOg9crzrUUApS8N4azGRikgMJqyHinxctGmEPVvPWKux8duoGY0PuYdFBmFLBv0CDp1 U1PXVI4w7L3I+kSBq4KNuT34r85u2/HV+QpJLeEI39UixZYrb+IMvCC0X0ei3xtooK8Q /Ncw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.18.110 with SMTP id v14mr8611343oed.135.1352145259636; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:54:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:54:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:54:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled From: Dani Moncayo To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) To reproduce this bug, you'll need a keyboard with "dead keys" (like my spanish keyboard, for example). Recipe from "emacs -Q": 1. Enable scroll-lock (I can't do this while the Emacs frame has the focus - I have to select another application before). 2. Try to write an accented "a" ("=E1") by typing the dead key "=B4" and then the key "a". I observe that: * What gets inserted is a plain "a" (without the accent). * The dead key has no effect over the "a" nor the following letters I type, until I type an : at that moment, an "=B4" is inserted instead. The above misbehavior persists even after exiting Emacs and starting it again (as long as scroll-lock is "on"). This bug has annoyed me for months, but until now I didn't have a reproducible recipe. In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7601) of 2012-11-05 on MS-W7-DANI Bzr revision: 110809 lekktu@gmail.com-20121105172930-a5gn0bwi4lndchhw Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -I../../libs/libXpm-3.5.10/include -I../../libs/libXpm-3.5.10/src -I../../libs/libpng-1.2.37-lib/include -I../../libs/zlib-1.2.5 -I../../libs/giflib-4.1.4-1-lib/include -I../../libs/jpeg-6b-4-lib/include -I../../libs/tiff-3.8.2-1-lib/include -I../../libs/libxml2-2.7.8-w32-bin/include/libxml2 -I../../libs/gnutls-3.0.9-w32-bin/include -I../../libs/libiconv-1.9.2-1-lib/include' Important settings: value of $LANG: ESN locale-coding-system: cp1252 default enable-multibyte-characters: t --=20 Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 05 15:47:00 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2012 20:47:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51077 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVTZT-0004NM-Ry for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:47:00 -0500 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:41410) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVTZR-0004NC-9j for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:46:58 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MD10090081MZN00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:43:17 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MD1009F2884RBB0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:43:17 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:43:12 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled In-reply-to: To: Dani Moncayo Message-id: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il References: X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:54:19 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > > To reproduce this bug, you'll need a keyboard with "dead keys" (like > my spanish keyboard, for example). > > Recipe from "emacs -Q": > > 1. Enable scroll-lock (I can't do this while the Emacs frame has the > focus - I have to select another application before). > 2. Try to write an accented "a" ("á") by typing the dead key "´" and > then the key "a". > > I observe that: > * What gets inserted is a plain "a" (without the accent). > * The dead key has no effect over the "a" nor the following letters I > type, until I type an : at that moment, an "´" is inserted > instead. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:54:19 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > > To reproduce this bug, you'll need a keyboard with "dead keys" (like > my spanish keyboard, for example). > > Recipe from "emacs -Q": > > 1. Enable scroll-lock (I can't do this while the Emacs frame has the > focus - I have to select another application before). > 2. Try to write an accented "a" ("á") by typing the dead key "´" and > then the key "a". > > I observe that: > * What gets inserted is a plain "a" (without the accent). > * The dead key has no effect over the "a" nor the following letters I > type, until I type an : at that moment, an "´" is inserted > instead. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:54:19 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo >=20 > To reproduce this bug, you'll need a keyboard with "dead keys" (lik= e > my spanish keyboard, for example). >=20 > Recipe from "emacs -Q": >=20 > 1. Enable scroll-lock (I can't do this while the Emacs frame has th= e > focus - I have to select another application before). > 2. Try to write an accented "a" ("=E1") by typing the dead key "= =B4" and > then the key "a". >=20 > I observe that: > * What gets inserted is a plain "a" (without the accent). > * The dead key has no effect over the "a" nor the following letters= I > type, until I type an : at that moment, an "=B4" is inserted > instead. What's the evidence that this is an Emacs bug, and not something that keyboard does on Windows? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 05 15:52:00 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2012 20:52:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51086 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVTeJ-0004UU-Ot for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:51:59 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:48545) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVTeI-0004UN-0m for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:51:58 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id v19so5785220obq.3 for <12806@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:48:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2o7BYGMplS+MU8x/AYz5alaHQFXxOVscPOPnFRHvJQo=; b=TcFtBMvfhf7HNn4yn5PVTgrUn2L5RMDkWonyYeoVF+2hF+g92YWOGMFyIqJwbBLvd5 51nM6BYdotUJW9d6C8FrKh++DF2q9hE75I2ZkL+hYfibDxesHARSlVJ3blfIt8c8olkA bDt4YnBKwFvKlShjbCLZPlAzFRS8LHbrqo24Qxdt0CceS/LpRpbFIDaF1i2U67cWZAR9 wPzNKRzO6G0ltoY1jBQ4x5syQC8NxTDxU/6+NJ9E0SXgWU9b9jy/PfOHNuMJ3I9FOYDl S9eMjyYulmHKIf/4r0Kmt3eUc90nUdyIQn6r8yvNaby52CqZE+JoQ/oSVG+2PjDS5Kwy sUDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.116.6 with SMTP id js6mr8744131obb.82.1352148530315; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:48:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 12:48:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:48:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled From: Dani Moncayo To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) > What's the evidence that this is an Emacs bug, and not something that > keyboard does on Windows? The evidence is that Emacs is the only windows application that presents the described misbehavior. IOW: I always can type accented vowels in all windows applications, regardless of whether scroll-lock is "on" or not. The only exception is Emacs. -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 05 16:00:33 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2012 21:00:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51104 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVTmb-0004hF-Af for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:00:33 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:37758) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVTmZ-0004h8-MB for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:00:32 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so5853581oag.3 for <12806@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:57:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gnxbcCTCSzWQPGmthh5wIRdW+8D6qzOeVGY3K1y+ySk=; b=IMEvOCTUWPEsfwEsRTIa9t/mIAFthv4lVAOc297g/55KNTGFjU4sbDDkjC8i1HtPNf vie1GjhJ6e9xibIB8Lq2ftoiuCHpwC2EWn65FgG1nFzKNatbxx5iVuNMrddIU4mi2bQE It4CqHbo5PlCLCfsz108v8DGVXZej8JJU9kujPpGOXX7rTsxFOXyo8Ja/QQ1naXsNFIa YniCoy9DMfF8aWUkthne/Z7BZZ8offLGhGHZODjjCP6WJBdPUbfNMc8qcq68lo7KuerQ h6Q35O4jrNPXvMprR30unjANGxmQLMlrF36h5akSD94vs5bd5ZqqX1+6dx4vtbA5HYKP CNeg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.23.79 with SMTP id k15mr8934081obf.100.1352149043896; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:57:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 12:57:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:57:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled From: Dani Moncayo To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: Juanma Barranquero , 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Dani Moncayo wrote: >> What's the evidence that this is an Emacs bug, and not something that >> keyboard does on Windows? > > The evidence is that Emacs is the only windows application that > presents the described misbehavior. > > IOW: I always can type accented vowels in all windows applications, > regardless of whether scroll-lock is "on" or not. The only exception > is Emacs. And BTW: I've reproduced this bug in two different machines: at work and at home. Juanma, please, could you say if you can also reproduce this bug. TIA. -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 05 18:31:57 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2012 23:31:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51219 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVW96-0000YT-Vp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:31:57 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]:57398) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVW95-0000YL-36 for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:31:55 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id d4so3694540eek.3 for <12806@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:28:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J3nz7rNmrGypy8AotgZBRLAUT3Cl5OCrSY07Y1s7JnY=; b=odMaaZj+jyWPq1sZiC3I6cXiLuvKe9xp37XWAEARnQIGIp8HVsfpQGPhGRYZAe8aX9 Gzfhl7kTtYxFp04S4pC8GSSU7Tv2ZJrWquaZa2OkFAUsAA82R9A+35QHgxhxO3J6LrGP l+v9k+ffkjT4+vfLsgJVOEq2lVPpBQh4w2BSkNWLoRIpIteIS4C/4um/7Nw1kw29vJUk V82laSoVa2YNZ1nxqeCDzFr18H8YRYFvd7hp732miPWzorJQjNDAK26k2osOhZjtZkZm GObbs3CAU3ONf6R5PSsUFF4is4s2SLFfEN7NBOJH1p+/Sb/AQJRPbW7MELDVPN3zdMoh aEzA== Received: by 10.14.1.69 with SMTP id 45mr42013395eec.23.1352158126383; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:28:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.62.204 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:28:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 00:28:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled To: Dani Moncayo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Dani Moncayo wrote: > Juanma, please, could you say if you can also reproduce this bug. TIA. Yes, and I agree that it is a bug, though what I see is very slightly different from what you report, at this point: > * The dead key has no effect over the "a" nor the following letters I > type, until I type an : at that moment, an "=C2=B4" is inserted > instead If I set scroll-lock and enter Emacs -Q (or Emacs -Q, then switch out of Emacs, set scroll-lock, switch back to Emacs), when I press =C2=B4 I get nothing until =C3=8D press "a" (and get "a", not "=C3=A1", or for example s= pace, and then I get =C2=B4 alone). Afterwards, pressing =C2=B4 inserts it, i.e.,= it doesn't work as a dead key, apparently. Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 05 18:55:11 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2012 23:55:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51263 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVWVb-00018B-CI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:55:11 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:48903) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVWVZ-000184-N7 for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:55:10 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so6003588oag.3 for <12806@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:52:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BiZ3nI4+7RWlub5TQzCL7Fg1ys5KDedPgSxXlgFHvTs=; b=XHjFZNaFElCfntdl75cCyNCbI2X6r/lwTfs45Ujp2UQjN63sMV30+VD8DCW9UcMhZu zNdcHKfRDJyQwq7gLfuDo78sfUoUgv/6eXMgICkxxIzQgEhMBI7uhwvulnCBxxsOa5b0 vVb9Dp6018GocZYpWFS5fQ0FJQzVelOtpCZ0AYjYCJ2eFoxOIsVBQr2KGmUBsKqJG36o ANhACPHsLBZb9L/f7E6MOjmxw71aLOJPKSgWut3W+2Hs7lrnFIANNn/GxBtnuKkjUFjr VnOVKydmo17/oYBcrQ7Pca4qoiHwaobcurhq5mAY/9n/8EiJgdE/1cYD7H+qeZUKachN AvOA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.146.107 with SMTP id tb11mr1972994obb.30.1352159520337; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:52:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:52:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 00:52:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled From: Dani Moncayo To: Juanma Barranquero Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) > If I set scroll-lock and enter Emacs -Q (or Emacs -Q, then switch out > of Emacs, set scroll-lock, switch back to Emacs), when I press =B4 I get > nothing until =CD press "a" (and get "a", not "=E1", or for example space= , > and then I get =B4 alone). Afterwards, pressing =B4 inserts it, i.e., it > doesn't work as a dead key, apparently. I think we see the same behavior: After typing the dead key, only a space or another dead key makes the "=B4" to show up. But if you've typed a second dead key, it will be "pending" until you type again a space or a third dead key. Anyway, it is definitely a bug. If you need me to provide more data or make some test, just ask. Thank you. --=20 Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 06 10:46:45 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2012 15:46:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52658 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVlMS-0006SZ-6o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:46:45 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:33003) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVlMR-0006SS-5m for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:46:43 -0500 Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id jc3so290170bkc.3 for <12806@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 07:43:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pIio/nfC8IWIXlL4P7Z+zKJ8HSgQbrc79dUzKnQe1LE=; b=bdjWm0nTySfa8teXeKcbuXZYkeeOX08f8itP7PAeYROKT52yNZF5ioUJ2m38TwZoeW 5nAyvutYdw8/Tt5+MleOWENUqO+auezgLCRNGGr0+YJJQ6Ws49Ud/9FbMooc6HPlqT+k zahp3k4map5DlP8TgcdrWwiHdQL4uvQJVAd4mSWzQTk1FsjNLeTxZt/u6LxVCkl0xq1k VmoAGDNtFTfkCrvGXvwF4SyXxOOeYKiRMQgC6hw6TXdrAwTMHEOzGxBDjaFimBDP2f6q YSmR6wrPMNE9MsOG1r1wDdq+cnmwbA2i+gERZ/NEjZguigVV5sRIiXCXcJHCLbr5u4Kq HSmQ== Received: by 10.204.136.197 with SMTP id s5mr399497bkt.88.1352216610470; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 07:43:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.34.204 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 07:42:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:42:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled To: Dani Moncayo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Dani Moncayo wrote: > 1. Enable scroll-lock (I can't do this while the Emacs frame has the > focus - I have to select another application before). BTW, this is because w32-scroll-lock-modifier defaults to nil, which means that the scroll-lock key is not a modifier (hyper, meta, etc.) and it's passed to Emacs (you could assign an interactive function to ). If you set w32-scroll-lock-modifier to t it will be passed to Windows and it will work as expected. > I observe that: > * What gets inserted is a plain "a" (without the accent). > * The dead key has no effect over the "a" nor the following letters I > type, until I type an : at that moment, an "=C2=B4" is inserted > instead. And BTW(2), this does not happen in emacs -Q -nw. Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 07 11:51:23 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2012 16:51:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54658 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TW8qY-0005m2-KV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:51:23 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:40091) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TW8qW-0005lu-Bz for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:51:21 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MD400A00MSN9D00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:51:22 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MD4009XCMTLWEM0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:51:22 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:51:22 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Dani Moncayo Message-id: <83sj8l1hmd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:48:50 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > What's the evidence that this is an Emacs bug, and not something that > > keyboard does on Windows? > > The evidence is that Emacs is the only windows application that > presents the described misbehavior. > > IOW: I always can type accented vowels in all windows applications, > regardless of whether scroll-lock is "on" or not. The only exception > is Emacs. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:48:50 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > What's the evidence that this is an Emacs bug, and not something that > > keyboard does on Windows? > > The evidence is that Emacs is the only windows application that > presents the described misbehavior. > > IOW: I always can type accented vowels in all windows applications, > regardless of whether scroll-lock is "on" or not. The only exception > is Emacs. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:48:50 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > What's the evidence that this is an Emacs bug, and not something that > > keyboard does on Windows? > > The evidence is that Emacs is the only windows application that > presents the described misbehavior. > > IOW: I always can type accented vowels in all windows applications, > regardless of whether scroll-lock is "on" or not. The only exception > is Emacs. Should be fixed in revision 110822 on the trunk. Please test, as I don't have dead keys on my keyboard to test them myself. (I didn't commit this on the release branch, because this problem existed since about forever, and so doesn't fit the criteria for changes on the branch as set by Chong.) > 1. Enable scroll-lock (I can't do this while the Emacs frame has the > focus - I have to select another application before). That you cannot do this in Emacs is by design: when w32-scroll-lock-modifier is nil, pressing that key when Emacs has focus is handled as a function key, and Emacs forcibly restores the previous state of Scroll Lock when you release the key. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 07 14:45:55 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2012 19:45:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWBZS-0002CS-K4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:45:55 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:45516) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWBZP-0002CJ-ES for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:45:51 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so1896556oag.3 for <12806@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:45:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/LrEahnq5yA5eLN3/M59wcpSreQu5vC/VMhgYF+OWrI=; b=r+55NxjUMaE5nXO2Y2uevm9Fok5o8QL514BS61HSMu0ZySgb4YZ8DUIlTF11Y14QQK qNaI0YijTtmvzo7sxBtZ/5dytqjgoovYZQG8AfWQB1x4yCFf0QnMvpdm0XfmwYassjfl sJTmc5hsNdqL/3jABTzp7FKPv91oPnNMJbiVrvVuhrTS7lfbewKC4VdZRg4zspG9AEVm U8LEfSfj5dNgPpgIUexR2beAq2wIOG3z0Vfu1r/pMsxBjrMNxEYX02/jQWTC+CKQTBcL 4dTGUDrBfT9G79pA5IcmiWEa1nm67a8rwO10AxzHPeu5SMkwpwQqkWx03RCUOvbVdPhY XsQA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.216.69 with SMTP id oo5mr3671028obc.45.1352317551015; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:45:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:45:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83sj8l1hmd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj8l1hmd.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 20:45:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled From: Dani Moncayo To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) > Should be fixed in revision 110822 on the trunk. Please test, as I > don't have dead keys on my keyboard to test them myself. The behavior I see now is the inverse: when scroll-lock is on, Emacs does TRT, but when it is off, Emacs fails to manage well the dead key (like before when scroll-lock was on). -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 07 15:10:05 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2012 20:10:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54814 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWBwq-0002jr-Qj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:10:05 -0500 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:54818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWBwn-0002jL-Gd for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:10:03 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MD400200VYAAN00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:09:30 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MD4002OZVZTA660@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:09:30 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:09:30 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Dani Moncayo Message-id: <83k3tx18g5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj8l1hmd.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 20:45:50 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Should be fixed in revision 110822 on the trunk. Please test, as I > > don't have dead keys on my keyboard to test them myself. > > The behavior I see now is the inverse: when scroll-lock is on, Emacs > does TRT, but when it is off, Emacs fails to manage well the dead key > (like before when scroll-lock was on). [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 20:45:50 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Should be fixed in revision 110822 on the trunk. Please test, as I > > don't have dead keys on my keyboard to test them myself. > > The behavior I see now is the inverse: when scroll-lock is on, Emacs > does TRT, but when it is off, Emacs fails to manage well the dead key > (like before when scroll-lock was on). [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 20:45:50 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Should be fixed in revision 110822 on the trunk. Please test, as I > > don't have dead keys on my keyboard to test them myself. > > The behavior I see now is the inverse: when scroll-lock is on, Emacs > does TRT, but when it is off, Emacs fails to manage well the dead key > (like before when scroll-lock was on). Sorry, you are on your own, then. The only similar problem I saw previously on my system is fixed by the changes I committed. There's something else going on with dead keys, obviously, but without knowing what's wrong, I cannot fix that. Try stepping through the code around lines 2973 to 3047 of w32fns.c, and see what is going on there when you type the dead key and the one after it. If you tell what you see, maybe I can suggest a solution. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 07 15:34:53 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2012 20:34:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54832 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWCKr-0003Sh-41 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:34:53 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:49708) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWCKp-0003Sb-FX for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:34:52 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so1949793oag.3 for <12806@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:34:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hvA8xDOqex4/G1UNb3yVEV+2LGKKEUYKoUEXDXAdCKs=; b=UQOz82IrkhmVujZ8A79yWB/gxRMZeG+D9OM+Snf+OembUXKRb/y9zpte2DBijGcya5 Cc4TEt8XSAlpMiC2nX95ZxqgvJTnFYQij7w+16SQcLPzV3V2YkznudgCX/5MPC6tLGqW TXx4The4i4Ps/Hjj2KUgJFtBj8hz/B5TvVbYKWLWWON1PUIlY+7TyQIGX7yKSRR7iM/N brJO1pOGzfb4vDUkd6x3zRatrtnhNKEIgB015ypSDgyl23NBqoNdjaTe2qT5M5YsNYcp wQEsItr+W5RMmYIvyMi1HKmn076Atjma4IqayCFJb+yiQWMt5mwh9Dqt4J/tqmnUMUzP 3umg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.150.34 with SMTP id uf2mr3833688obb.66.1352320493181; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:34:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83k3tx18g5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj8l1hmd.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3tx18g5.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:34:53 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled From: Dani Moncayo To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) >> The behavior I see now is the inverse: when scroll-lock is on, Emacs >> does TRT, but when it is off, Emacs fails to manage well the dead key >> (like before when scroll-lock was on). > > Sorry, you are on your own, then. The only similar problem I saw > previously on my system is fixed by the changes I committed. There's > something else going on with dead keys, obviously, but without knowing > what's wrong, I cannot fix that. Try stepping through the code around > lines 2973 to 3047 of w32fns.c, and see what is going on there when > you type the dead key and the one after it. If you tell what you see, > maybe I can suggest a solution. I'll see what can I do, but FWIW, the situation now is much worse than before: * Scroll lock is a key that is usually set "off"; that explains why no one noticed this bug until now. * What is more important: I've just seen that typing `C-M-u' does nothing on Emacs. It is as if no key was pressed at all. If I do `C-h c C-M-u' the minibuffer stays as if no key was pressed after `C-h c'. FWIW: * This is with bzr revno 110824. * Your commit at revno 110822 has a typo: the bug number is "12086", but you wrote "1280". -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 07 15:36:57 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2012 20:36:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54836 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWCMq-0003Vd-Ry for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:36:57 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:45217) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWCMp-0003VW-5c for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:36:55 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id v19so1926903obq.3 for <12806@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:36:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cGilU0y9yPPmi6ipHj+l0XReaN8dODGEIzHyJzWoOaU=; b=qqBIvEhyOcGxcFb3t4I+00O8vEti4AqSkslkflMJxnjSsUa+MZY+eHQURLzhASfLi8 KonpIDXzUXO6/AalrS5npvE9XuqQY1WivK90uL8w/YxOY8KLN0jtOqSmHb589DrRbOmV zE4B82STCTqDDZU9Qo8i+lkY7p/LzYzybDzYpDYo79sxB9xx+RnFp9AiKzEHA7eUqf72 BOVWdTt5SRYJdpf0beEOzX4MZGHeLZRtz39tv7z/h6zE9SgM26olk9Aj9Vu9PiDN2pdg xmT/Z3oGNZkNrsU5ClSWvKTytRJfxreUDQhgofgAN9gq6g1qy81nUPQQVefa+G3bNwLo gwFQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.170.233 with SMTP id ap9mr3010927oec.31.1352320616979; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:36:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:36:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj8l1hmd.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3tx18g5.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:36:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled From: Dani Moncayo To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) > * What is more important: I've just seen that typing `C-M-u' does > nothing on Emacs. It is as if no key was pressed at all. If I do > `C-h c C-M-u' the minibuffer stays as if no key was pressed after `C-h > c'. I didn't mention that this anomaly happens only when scroll-lock is "on". -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 07 16:14:10 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2012 21:14:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54878 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWCws-0004Mm-4M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:14:10 -0500 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:60170) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWCwo-0004Mc-PR for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:14:08 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MD400200YXLMR00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:14:06 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MD4002CYYZIJQB0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:14:06 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:14:07 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Dani Moncayo Message-id: <83ip9h15gg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj8l1hmd.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3tx18g5.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:36:56 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > * What is more important: I've just seen that typing `C-M-u' does > > nothing on Emacs. It is as if no key was pressed at all. If I do > > `C-h c C-M-u' the minibuffer stays as if no key was pressed after `C-h > > c'. > > I didn't mention that this anomaly happens only when scroll-lock is "on". [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:36:56 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > * What is more important: I've just seen that typing `C-M-u' does > > nothing on Emacs. It is as if no key was pressed at all. If I do > > `C-h c C-M-u' the minibuffer stays as if no key was pressed after `C-h > > c'. > > I didn't mention that this anomaly happens only when scroll-lock is "on". [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4978] > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:36:56 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > * What is more important: I've just seen that typing `C-M-u' does > > nothing on Emacs. It is as if no key was pressed at all. If I do > > `C-h c C-M-u' the minibuffer stays as if no key was pressed after `C-h > > c'. > > I didn't mention that this anomaly happens only when scroll-lock is "on". I reverted the previous change and committed a different one, please see if it solves the problems. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 07 16:29:58 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2012 21:29:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54891 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWDC9-0004j1-2s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:29:58 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:51913) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWDC6-0004io-VL for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:29:55 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so2004724oag.3 for <12806@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:29:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lMUNhvPPe59zZixK061EZ3GaGlZaBSW9qUtzkDbYk58=; b=XJSh5T8ewWRgfrvsYtKWPqwxA9t5FHWWLVM19oHBWZ+xyye80QcA+4p4dpKZar7Iqw Yy3gp+KkpcV+gtYayPW8ji9PTirtGBH/mbI2GkmnWqelaSFo6nBgr/W44l/9N6HkDGys Za39aOVci8/gv5JshnZZMPiEzr3c7oyFD+P0hECbr239aOOwXGgi+vF/DojysvttGC7u EVmO7YlZc0bWcg+vffAAYoSjBSGTr0D6JVtRg4Nm0CXsIComnNL1fSiomGaAUPBqOI0m AIAx5t9pbarH4ZCTStkGP/6BftgD3Hzg+twiqaHEPTgGucYUj6VUgmhE3J4jrg1kJywD AJ3g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.78.137 with SMTP id b9mr3936480obx.94.1352323796028; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:29:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:29:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83ip9h15gg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj8l1hmd.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3tx18g5.fsf@gnu.org> <83ip9h15gg.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:29:55 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled From: Dani Moncayo To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) > I reverted the previous change and committed a different one, please > see if it solves the problems. Thanks. This is what I see now: * C-M-u works again, regardless of the scroll-lock setting. * The dead keys don't work (same misbehavior already described), also regardless of the scroll-lock setting. * The caps-lock key doesn't work: letters are written in lowercase, regardless of its setting. -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 07 16:50:58 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2012 21:50:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54899 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWDWU-0005Ez-4l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:50:58 -0500 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:40806) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWDWR-0005Eq-9V for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:50:56 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MD500G000HTVI00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:50:05 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MD500GBC0NHR6R0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:50:05 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:50:06 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Dani Moncayo Message-id: <83ehk513sh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj8l1hmd.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3tx18g5.fsf@gnu.org> <83ip9h15gg.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:29:55 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I reverted the previous change and committed a different one, please > > see if it solves the problems. > > Thanks. This is what I see now: > * C-M-u works again, regardless of the scroll-lock setting. > * The dead keys don't work (same misbehavior already described), also > regardless of the scroll-lock setting. > * The caps-lock key doesn't work: letters are written in lowercase, > regardless of its setting. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:29:55 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I reverted the previous change and committed a different one, please > > see if it solves the problems. > > Thanks. This is what I see now: > * C-M-u works again, regardless of the scroll-lock setting. > * The dead keys don't work (same misbehavior already described), also > regardless of the scroll-lock setting. > * The caps-lock key doesn't work: letters are written in lowercase, > regardless of its setting. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:29:55 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I reverted the previous change and committed a different one, please > > see if it solves the problems. > > Thanks. This is what I see now: > * C-M-u works again, regardless of the scroll-lock setting. > * The dead keys don't work (same misbehavior already described), also > regardless of the scroll-lock setting. > * The caps-lock key doesn't work: letters are written in lowercase, > regardless of its setting. The last one works for me just fine. Are you sure caps-lock does not work at all, no matter what the state of the various "lock" keys? If that only happened when Num Lock was on, then I fixed that in revision 110826. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 07 17:12:30 2012 Received: (at 12806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2012 22:12:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54915 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWDrJ-0005j6-Au for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:12:30 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:42039) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWDrH-0005iz-J2 for 12806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:12:28 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id v19so2016920obq.3 for <12806@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:12:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=svq48052ge0mUiB0M3xCJENgxWFlxRFW5ExN8j3YCxE=; b=ExnPxrmk/jWiquFXbm8aiAUgrdigwAX43FbTl4s+gwI3sem0+o1uBqmhvTpgCYHbPK ZoKCqIUdrehmzuz4Z0hPOzvJ4wMQfv103pXnB9w2iz5mZs6t6a3gvZGav9yIlfY7G+HN xkeCsGdJ2obEaRR7SWuBsms+A0NQrtwLIsfu3Yp3K28vb6ww3UbNSGpm3zkV2MnVD9XZ Uopx19mWDHj5pKNv+4MnGOINhNMVkN95FvqG7E6qXOWw4l06hVWJeNQL/R/tRmEw/Rlf oLLS1RVJMtZ+npat22DMq0WGuCM7IHBovusZs7mfl2O3NC7HtaxM91LcDiIUdPTvw+zp WKNg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.18.110 with SMTP id v14mr3246421oed.135.1352326347912; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:12:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:12:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83ehk513sh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj8l1hmd.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3tx18g5.fsf@gnu.org> <83ip9h15gg.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehk513sh.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:12:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled From: Dani Moncayo To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806 Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) > The last one works for me just fine. Are you sure caps-lock does not > work at all, no matter what the state of the various "lock" keys? If > that only happened when Num Lock was on, then I fixed that in revision > 110826. I didn't try to change num-lock. So, with revno 110825 the caps-lock key works only when num-lock is off, because if I set num-lock on, all letters are written in lowercase as I said. Now, with revno 110826 everything seem to work correctly, even the original problem of this bug report. So I think you can close this bug report. Thank you so much! -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 07 22:47:44 2012 Received: (at 12806-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2012 03:47:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55088 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWJ5k-0006kO-0P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:47:44 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:48709) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWJ5h-0006k3-Di for 12806-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:47:41 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MD500G00H489U00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 12806-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 05:47:21 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MD500GVWH6X50O0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 05:47:21 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 05:47:23 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12806: 24.3.50; Dead keys misbehavior when scroll-lock is enabled In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Dani Moncayo Message-id: <83bof821tg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sj8n3hnj.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj8l1hmd.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3tx18g5.fsf@gnu.org> <83ip9h15gg.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehk513sh.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:12:27 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > The last one works for me just fine. Are you sure caps-lock does not > > work at all, no matter what the state of the various "lock" keys? If > > that only happened when Num Lock was on, then I fixed that in revision > > 110826. > > I didn't try to change num-lock. So, with revno 110825 the caps-lock > key works only when num-lock is off, because if I set num-lock on, all > letters are written in lowercase as I said. > > Now, with revno 110826 everything seem to work correctly, even the > original problem of this bug report. > > So I think you can close this bug report. > > Thank you so much! [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12806-done Cc: 12806-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:12:27 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > The last one works for me just fine. Are you sure caps-lock does not > > work at all, no matter what the state of the various "lock" keys? If > > that only happened when Num Lock was on, then I fixed that in revision > > 110826. > > I didn't try to change num-lock. So, with revno 110825 the caps-lock > key works only when num-lock is off, because if I set num-lock on, all > letters are written in lowercase as I said. > > Now, with revno 110826 everything seem to work correctly, even the > original problem of this bug report. > > So I think you can close this bug report. > > Thank you so much! [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:12:27 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12806@debbugs.gnu.org > > > The last one works for me just fine. Are you sure caps-lock does not > > work at all, no matter what the state of the various "lock" keys? If > > that only happened when Num Lock was on, then I fixed that in revision > > 110826. > > I didn't try to change num-lock. So, with revno 110825 the caps-lock > key works only when num-lock is off, because if I set num-lock on, all > letters are written in lowercase as I said. > > Now, with revno 110826 everything seem to work correctly, even the > original problem of this bug report. > > So I think you can close this bug report. > > Thank you so much! Great, closing. From unknown Thu Aug 14 22:24:25 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:24:02 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator