GNU bug report logs - #12797
24.3.50; mml-atttach-file (C-c C-a) and ido

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 07:30:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.3.50

Done: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 12797 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 12797 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#12797: 24.3.50; mml-atttach-file (C-c C-a) and ido
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 22:19:19 -0500
>>> When I am attaching files to mails via C-c C-a, I am fooled in to
>>> thinking that the intereface for reading file is not that of ido but the
>>> default one (Emacs + icomplete).
>> I do not know why you feel this way.  Can you be more precise?
> Try it out.  (May be you don't rely ido much? May be this is the reason
> my "experience" seems a bit "out of place" to you?)
> I gave example of BACKSPACE (which you have stripped).

To clarify: I have not stated any opinion on what you suggest, for the
simple reason that I do not know/understand what it is.
Are you reporting a bug in ido, a bug in icomplete, requesting new
features in icomplete?

>>> Can someone install the needful, so that I don't keep tripping over
>>> differences in the implementation.
>> Your bug report did not make it clear what are "the needful",
>> I'm afraid.
> I have indicated two needfuls - defalias (which needs to be undefaliased
> if ido is turned off) or the (put .. 'ido ..) stuff.  Unfortunately, you
> have deemed it as insubstantial.

No, I just don't understand what they're about.
E.g. why/when do you need them?  Why are they a problem?  Would you want
them to be included in Emacs?  If not, are you saying that it should
be easier to do it in one's .emacs?

> ps: I am arguing for consistency of file-reading/completion experience.
> A user cannot be concerned with who provides the interface - ido,
> iswitchb or anything else.

AFAIK, the default completion is fairly consistent.
The iswitchb completion is inconsistent by nature: it's specific to
buffer completion.
So, this is requesting a change in ido?


        Stefan




This bug report was last modified 12 years and 15 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.