From unknown Tue Aug 19 01:59:17 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#12791 <12791@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#12791 <12791@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.2; An option to load user init file with -batch Reply-To: bug#12791 <12791@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:59:17 +0000 retitle 12791 24.2; An option to load user init file with -batch reassign 12791 emacs submitter 12791 Leo severity 12791 wishlist tag 12791 wontfix thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 03 03:57:52 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2012 07:57:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46619 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUYc4-0004rZ-4L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 03:57:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48712) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUYc2-0004rS-1G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 03:57:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUYZE-0007Nk-9e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 03:54:57 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:42097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUYZE-0007Ng-5t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 03:54:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUYZD-0001Of-Az for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 03:54:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUYZC-0007NB-EL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 03:54:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:35968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUYZC-0007Mz-7Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 03:54:54 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id rq2so3095737pbb.0 for ; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 00:54:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=worM9F0IJxcoI7YSyHJh4UU94v4cnRTj84fAQuYn6OU=; b=AkOgm1jf3lDCVfUjQhiA6whEkOIW7UO+6efNz1hzzbNzldMOjif0eKTf3OnEkWSCLn EDNzllPPeIN+tplVVl595qv2cIE4AcBRXsE6BGX8IqOFLfJRsCoeKIxxY2DEJAq3HboZ y5kNF/jUEjHp0CcLmWFOm4tyZ2htgSOt/LfYeogcoR1FpweGXeG12BZRJ7JOsiksNyhc tqUTzICRSV4EiC1Ir2y1/scK791lYSqVa91cAA/HDGl5Q2KCcThO27oN1a+OaQqT7tfg Y3lToMewnHs9dY8okbrDUGqFyPKKxUIIUxtADVxMLKMbVTQow0Co7/QDusnAlRJPw7ss mOjg== Received: by 10.66.77.105 with SMTP id r9mr11965484paw.76.1351929293272; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 00:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([119.255.41.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wo9sm7037112pbc.53.2012.11.03.00.54.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Nov 2012 00:54:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Leo To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.2; An option to load user init file with -batch Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:54:44 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) -batch implies -q and I cannot find an option to negate it. For example, I want to add some tests to my emacs init files and be able to run `ert-run-tests-batch' in batch mode. Any objection if I add an option such as '--load-init-file'? Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 03 06:06:02 2012 Received: (at 12791) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2012 10:06:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46684 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUac6-0007lE-0v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 06:06:02 -0400 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:65502) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUac4-0007ko-It for 12791@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 06:06:01 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MCW00D00OXHZN00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 12791@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:02:45 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MCW00DKUP8LZP10@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:02:45 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:02:34 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12791: 24.2; An option to load user init file with -batch In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Leo Message-id: <83a9uz57id.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Leo > Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:54:44 +0800 > > -batch implies -q and I cannot find an option to negate it. For example, > I want to add some tests to my emacs init files and be able to run > `ert-run-tests-batch' in batch mode. > > Any objection if I add an option such as '--load-init-file'? [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12791 Cc: 12791@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Leo > Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:54:44 +0800 > > -batch implies -q and I cannot find an option to negate it. For example, > I want to add some tests to my emacs init files and be able to run > `ert-run-tests-batch' in batch mode. > > Any objection if I add an option such as '--load-init-file'? [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > From: Leo > Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:54:44 +0800 > > -batch implies -q and I cannot find an option to negate it. For example, > I want to add some tests to my emacs init files and be able to run > `ert-run-tests-batch' in batch mode. > > Any objection if I add an option such as '--load-init-file'? What's wrong with "-l ~/.emacs"? The difference in the loading order is a non-issue in batch mode anyway. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 03 10:44:58 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2012 14:44:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47247 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUey2-0007Ux-5Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:44:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57711) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUey0-0007Uq-5o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:44:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUevA-0000Cy-C5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:42:01 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:44026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUevA-0000Ct-96 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:42:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37547) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUev9-0003To-HG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:42:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUev8-0000CR-IV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:41:59 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUev8-0000C2-Bi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:41:58 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TUevA-0005XA-2U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:42:00 +0100 Received: from 182.48.109.8 ([182.48.109.8]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:42:00 +0100 Received: from sdl.web by 182.48.109.8 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:42:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Leo Subject: Re: bug#12791: 24.2; An option to load user init file with -batch Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:41:41 +0800 Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <83a9uz57id.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 182.48.109.8 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAElBMVEUAAAAAAP+LRRP0pGC+ vr7///+7mT1iAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMO DhglKe4AAAEsSURBVCjPbZNBboQwDEV/Cd4X9QJRThApmn0XYW+Jyf2v0m+HhqDBgiAe9rcTG7QH w/1Vn2Ar8gBb/ocywSN3qK9T3z4eFDB4eApocBpeBs1RSykoJd8gQcm8pGmHXFso3ajnmsqV0TnY DQkOfXUfN5NwaI7AWTVOyEhcu1aHmdWItHddUVUcUgUBCkitu8V6ditHVOVdqzl2EQ1ZVGTbdK0V 7cqn8vWzoU5Q/bF9Y/Y0cRU1xwkys5dJ+Dt6pBDWifcNQml8Gh2JVmPSoQzo7en0grswkxrUGYJ7 0hSxxAGr7ZMwYcHIzprpi7TENEE1xtiYxixRlCfPBsUUrwHD7uGIwATrbnODJcVrPpVn3hxiGloe m/S+z3CtuzUSMo83N4DPH+F0evwR3P4A2k+75838OKQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (OS X 10.8.2) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7gg9d3Oos1eXDuU2pmEbY7wb7Yk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) On 2012-11-03 18:02 +0800, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > What's wrong with "-l ~/.emacs"? The difference in the loading order > is a non-issue in batch mode anyway. not portable. Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 03 11:36:21 2012 Received: (at 12791) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2012 15:36:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUfll-00016f-KY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:36:21 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:61280) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUfli-00016W-0S for 12791@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:36:19 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MCX00I004E98600@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 12791@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:33:14 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MCX00IE14J82C40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:33:08 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:32:58 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12791: 24.2; An option to load user init file with -batch In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Leo Message-id: <83390q66s5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a9uz57id.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Leo > Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:41:41 +0800 > > On 2012-11-03 18:02 +0800, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > What's wrong with "-l ~/.emacs"? The difference in the loading order > > is a non-issue in batch mode anyway. > > not portable. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12791 Cc: 12791@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Leo > Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:41:41 +0800 > > On 2012-11-03 18:02 +0800, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > What's wrong with "-l ~/.emacs"? The difference in the loading order > > is a non-issue in batch mode anyway. > > not portable. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > From: Leo > Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:41:41 +0800 > > On 2012-11-03 18:02 +0800, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > What's wrong with "-l ~/.emacs"? The difference in the loading order > > is a non-issue in batch mode anyway. > > not portable. Sorry, I don't understand. Please elaborate: when does it not work and why? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 03 15:05:00 2012 Received: (at 12791) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2012 19:05:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47513 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUj1f-0000pA-HB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:05:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:40974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUj1d-0000p2-5a for 12791@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:04:57 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUiyl-0002jW-EU; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:01:59 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12791: 24.2; An option to load user init file with -batch References: <83a9uz57id.fsf@gnu.org> <83390q66s5.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: csystems Honduras NATO CDC Mossad sweep Roswell ANDVT X-Ran: w4*>j=O`dZg"ru>O\QS$w(GDdO>NodgDu+fhO(X#Ji#y]"qi=3$bkJ6b~Het"h=]H]k~*| X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:01:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83390q66s5.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:32:58 +0200") Message-ID: <8hmwyyjys8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12791 Cc: 12791@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > What's wrong with "-l ~/.emacs"? The difference in the loading >> > order is a non-issue in batch mode anyway. >> >> not portable. > > Sorry, I don't understand. Please elaborate: when does it not work > and why? One possibility: maybe the init file is actually ~/.emacs.el, or ~/.emacs.d/init.el, etc. So the caller would have to do (a small amount of) actual work to locate it, rather than just letting Emacs handle it transparently as normal. (It sure would waste less time if reports were less vague, particularly when asking for new features to be implemented.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 04 12:21:29 2012 Received: (at 12791) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2012 17:21:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49216 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TV3t2-0001bA-U6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 12:21:29 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]:47619) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TV3t1-0001b3-2S for 12791@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 12:21:27 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id d4so2921051eek.3 for <12791@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 09:18:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=hBm98sVBYwcNQLCqsIf0AOuuwO4OBQKuzDQvPoD/9us=; b=UbEJOP9EQechfsFz7Vkr7wgdAsa1XBTS4AQHf7gKbJlsdebJ9XgxUKF4KmA3aCoOc5 e0WAPq74f3278y3LpVf2rWerhjzDHukwUm5v+0acP4rA1ntWru11ngzmapM28ISLCACu VmTftwSiqjhd7vTgkFKPIKskXhhFPczvSFjJQhAd7kSR5lq1A6YkoGbIcVQ9acHaV02d C40yd7lfQqJSKMiLACy0waUxg4bEaCO+AYytt9xvrFoULtUtB6E6X1JxQ9tvukXVpIqN KF9luia277I0kR/f6DpQZS2j/qGY27w7/Ehz7KgR0CH5Rwx6KcLUjj036EU1RUdnkLL9 zUyQ== Received: by 10.14.193.136 with SMTP id k8mr27860121een.30.1352049505691; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 09:18:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.62.204 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 09:17:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 18:17:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#12791: 24.2; An option to load user init file with -batch To: Leo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12791 Cc: 12791@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Leo wrote: > -batch implies -q and I cannot find an option to negate it. For example, > I want to add some tests to my emacs init files and be able to run > `ert-run-tests-batch' in batch mode. Another small difference between runing an interactive emacs and doing "emacs -batch" and loading your .emacs is that under "emacs -batch" it is possible that the directory pointed out by user-emacs-directory does not exist, and locate-user-emacs-file quite deliberately takes steps not to create it (because otherwise you'll end with .emacs.d/ directories at unexpected places, while bootstrapping,etc.) Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 03 23:50:00 2021 Received: (at 12791) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2021 04:50:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mtMzn-0000ql-W3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 23:50:00 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60654) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mtMzm-0000qX-J7 for 12791@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 23:49:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7Swg9bCgSFaxkjnkZhbc+hQ6g2+yhANnNkLLh17qWz0=; b=Edex5xn51IS/nRZukG74HZEEd+ /qxtO8Q6UAxMb1B312oea4BEQFZY7k06ENJsgAcSDSIh8IkxOR/8Z0Ci4kLXSPSN6S43KSf+Rhmbu 3zQ7rX38W+2oASfXWZEgzJCxIY9hTXcaUf+7rl2ZA3IoDEmKIEdlg+niSBxTtz51Rjm8=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mtMze-0002Zp-Mk; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 05:49:53 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Leo Subject: Re: bug#12791: 24.2; An option to load user init file with -batch References: <83a9uz57id.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Neil Young's _Harvest_: "Harvest" Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2021 05:49:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:41:41 +0800") Message-ID: <87h7bpotxt.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Leo writes: > On 2012-11-03 18:02 +0800, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> What's wrong with "-l ~/.emacs"? The difference in the loading order >> is a non-issue in batch mode anyway. > > not portable. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12791 Cc: 12791@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Leo writes: > On 2012-11-03 18:02 +0800, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> What's wrong with "-l ~/.emacs"? The difference in the loading order >> is a non-issue in batch mode anyway. > > not portable. (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) I think people know where their ~/.emacs files are, so "-Q -l ~/.emacs" covers virtually all use cases. I don't think adding a --load-init-file option would be sufficiently useful as a feature (and it's ambiguous what init file we're referring to), so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 03 23:50:05 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2021 04:50:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mtMzt-0000rU-6f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 23:50:05 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60668) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mtMzs-0000qe-43 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 23:50:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PZYPnac6Jfi1UpgiqAbF43BCLFzk3bSRfoXle4t+Mt8=; b=UaB6iRdY2Ux9Ne/NKnQHmPjPVB /rlpBRjD2wABev6cmQ7cn1Dr1NCvndzXRyIIWEOjfqrJTU66QtEVivSn83STUevixW2RpX0o9w0z7 ebWwu9ZlA27wrzXWV7F0tbhQvZGQ7NXzkH64r9+poq2Es3fcnDGUK8yNmffNXPNyDSUY=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mtMzk-0002Zz-Ig for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 05:49:58 +0100 Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2021 05:49:56 +0100 Message-Id: <87fsr9otxn.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #12791 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 12791 wontfix close 12791 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 12791 wontfix close 12791 quit From unknown Tue Aug 19 01:59:17 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2022 12:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator