Subject: Re: bug#12760: letf doc is not very helpful

From: Glenn Morris <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:40:44 -0400

Stefan Monnier wrote:

>> -> Like `cl-letf', but with some extra backward compatibility.
>> This is so vague as to not be useful.
>
> The only difference (handling of funbound symbols for symbol-function)
> is one I'd rather not document because it's deprecated.

Maybe you want to mark letf obsolete (as labels and flet are).