From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:28:49 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#12733 <12733@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#12733 <12733@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif Reply-To: bug#12733 <12733@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 01:28:49 +0000 retitle 12733 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --= with-x-toolkit=3Dmotif reassign 12733 emacs submitter 12733 Ulrich Mueller severity 12733 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 25 11:18:38 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2012 15:18:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33357 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPCg-0006y5-8Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:18:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47867) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPCe-0006xy-FO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:18:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPAa-0004aa-BX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:16:32 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:53136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPAa-0004aW-8K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:16:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47059) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPAV-0000qt-GK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:16:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPAR-0004YH-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:16:23 -0400 Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.134.1]:59570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPAQ-0004WJ-PL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:16:18 -0400 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q9PFG5vG017256 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:16:05 +0200 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q9PFG56m014194; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:16:05 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9PFG5Y1014190; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:16:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:16:05 +0200 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 23.4.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) With Emacs from BZR (revision 110662) linked against the Motif toolkit (version 2.3.4), I observe that after disabling the menu bar, the frame doesn't have the correct height. The result is that the modeline and the minibuffer are no longer visible. Steps to reproduce: $ emacs -Q ;; Lisp Interaction Mode: (frame-pixel-height) 608 (frame-height) 38 (menu-bar-mode -1) nil ;; At this point, the X window shrinks by the height of the menu bar. ;; However, the bottom of the frame contents (containing modeline and ;; minibuffer) are no longer visible. (frame-pixel-height) 608 ;; Number of lines is _larger_ than before: (frame-height) 40 In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, Motif Version 2.3.4) of 2012-10-25 on juno Bzr revision: eggert@cs.ucla.edu-20121025043539-ywusszr9cgklw9p7 Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11300000 System Description: Gentoo Base System release 2.2 Configured using: `configure '--prefix=/usr' '--build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu' '--host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--datadir=/usr/share' '--sysconfdir=/etc' '--localstatedir=/var/lib' '--libdir=/usr/lib64' '--disable-dependency-tracking' '--program-suffix=-emacs-24-vcs' '--program-transform-name=s/emacs-[0-9].*/emacs-24-vcs/' '--infodir=/usr/share/info/emacs-24-vcs' '--enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp' '--with-crt-dir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.3/../../../../lib64' '--with-gameuser=games' '--without-compress-info' '--without-hesiod' '--without-kerberos' '--without-kerberos5' '--with-gpm' '--with-dbus' '--without-gnutls' '--without-xml2' '--without-selinux' '--without-wide-int' '--with-sound' '--with-x' '--without-ns' '--without-gconf' '--without-gsettings' '--without-toolkit-scroll-bars' '--with-gif' '--with-jpeg' '--with-png' '--with-rsvg' '--with-tiff' '--with-xpm' '--with-imagemagick' '--with-xft' '--without-libotf' '--without-m17n-flt' '--with-x-toolkit=motif' 'GENTOO_PACKAGE=app-editors/emacs-vcs-24.2.9999' 'EBZR_BRANCH=trunk' 'EBZR_REVNO=110662' 'build_alias=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu' 'host_alias=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-march=core2 -ggdb -O2 -pipe -O2' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed' 'CPPFLAGS='' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 29 07:55:33 2012 Received: (at 12733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2012 11:55:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37552 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TSnwL-0000Uy-Fd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 07:55:33 -0400 Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.134.1]:43288) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TSnwI-0000Uq-PW for 12733@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 07:55:32 -0400 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q9TBr3jW021491 for <12733@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:53:03 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q9TBr3Z5021951; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:53:03 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9TBr2aY021949; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:53:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20622.28190.808960.297381@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:53:02 +0100 To: 12733@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif In-Reply-To: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 23.4.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12733 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) >>>>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > With Emacs from BZR (revision 110662) linked against the Motif toolkit > (version 2.3.4), I observe that after disabling the menu bar, the > frame doesn't have the correct height. The result is that the modeline > and the minibuffer are no longer visible. > Steps to reproduce: > $ emacs -Q > ;; Lisp Interaction Mode: > (frame-pixel-height) > 608 In fact, there's already an inconsistency here. The documentation of frame-pixel-height says: With the Motif or Lucid toolkits, it also includes the tool bar (but not the menu bar). However, if I measure the height on my screen, it is 608 pixels in total, i.e. including _both_ the tool bar and the menu bar. (I see the same inconsistency if configured --with-x-toolkit=lucid, BTW.) Is it an error in the code or in the documentation? > (frame-height) > 38 > (menu-bar-mode -1) > nil > ;; At this point, the X window shrinks by the height of the menu bar. > ;; However, the bottom of the frame contents (containing modeline and > ;; minibuffer) are no longer visible. > (frame-pixel-height) > 608 This value is definitely wrong. Measured height is only 572 pixels. > ;; Number of lines is _larger_ than before: > (frame-height) > 40 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 30 14:45:39 2012 Received: (at 12733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2012 18:45:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40047 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTGok-0007HI-V5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:45:39 -0400 Received: from mailout.melmac.se ([62.20.26.67]:61187) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTGof-0007H7-Rg for 12733@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:45:36 -0400 Received: from mail01.melmac.se (mail01.melmac.se [62.20.26.80]) by mailout.melmac.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FC492CF for <12733@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:42:58 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 23926 invoked by uid 89); 30 Oct 2012 18:42:58 -0000 Received: from h-46-59-42-18.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.18) by mail01.melmac.se with ESMTPA; 30 Oct 2012 18:42:58 -0000 Received: from anon-171-204.vpn.ipredator.se (anon-171-204.vpn.ipredator.se [93.182.171.204]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EA567FA05E; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:42:58 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: bug#12733: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= In-Reply-To: <20622.28190.808960.297381@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:42:57 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0D00FAF3-BE3C-4BFD-9481-FE6702CF8F37@swipnet.se> References: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20622.28190.808960.297381@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> To: Ulrich Mueller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello. 29 okt 2012 kl. 12:53 skrev Ulrich Mueller : >>>>>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> With Emacs from BZR (revision 110662) linked against the Motif toolkit >> (version 2.3.4), I observe that after disabling the menu bar, the >> frame doesn't have the correct height. The result is that the modeline >> and the minibuffer are no longer visible. > >> Steps to reproduce: > >> $ emacs -Q > >> ; ; Lisp Interaction Mode: >> (frame-pixel-height) >> 608 > > In fact, there's already an inconsistency here. The documentation of > frame-pixel-height says: > > With the Motif or Lucid toolkits, it also includes the tool bar > (but not the menu bar). > > However, if I measure the height on my screen, it is 608 pixels in > total, i.e. including _both_ the tool bar and the menu bar. (I see the > same inconsistency if configured --with-x-toolkit=lucid, BTW.) > > Is it an error in the code or in the documentation? [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12733 Cc: 12733@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello. 29 okt 2012 kl. 12:53 skrev Ulrich Mueller : >>>>>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> With Emacs from BZR (revision 110662) linked against the Motif toolkit >> (version 2.3.4), I observe that after disabling the menu bar, the >> frame doesn't have the correct height. The result is that the modeline >> and the minibuffer are no longer visible. > >> Steps to reproduce: > >> $ emacs -Q > >> ;; Lisp Interaction Mode: >> (frame-pixel-height) >> 608 > > In fact, there's already an inconsistency here. The documentation of > frame-pixel-height says: > > With the Motif or Lucid toolkits, it also includes the tool bar > (but not the menu bar). > > However, if I measure the height on my screen, it is 608 pixels in > total, i.e. including _both_ the tool bar and the menu bar. (I see the > same inconsistency if configured --with-x-toolkit=lucid, BTW.) > > Is it an error in the code or in the documentation? [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] Hello. 29 okt 2012 kl. 12:53 skrev Ulrich Mueller : >>>>>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >=20 >> With Emacs from BZR (revision 110662) linked against the Motif = toolkit >> (version 2.3.4), I observe that after disabling the menu bar, the >> frame doesn't have the correct height. The result is that the = modeline >> and the minibuffer are no longer visible. >=20 >> Steps to reproduce: >=20 >> $ emacs -Q >=20 >> ;; Lisp Interaction Mode: >> (frame-pixel-height) >> 608 >=20 > In fact, there's already an inconsistency here. The documentation of > frame-pixel-height says: >=20 > With the Motif or Lucid toolkits, it also includes the tool bar > (but not the menu bar). >=20 > However, if I measure the height on my screen, it is 608 pixels in > total, i.e. including _both_ the tool bar and the menu bar. (I see the > same inconsistency if configured --with-x-toolkit=3Dlucid, BTW.) >=20 > Is it an error in the code or in the documentation? I've fixed the documentation. >=20 >> (frame-height) >> 38 >> (menu-bar-mode -1) >> nil >> ;; At this point, the X window shrinks by the height of the menu = bar. >> ;; However, the bottom of the frame contents (containing modeline = and >> ;; minibuffer) are no longer visible. Do they appear if you resize the frame a bit? >=20 >> (frame-pixel-height) >> 608 >=20 > This value is definitely wrong. Measured height is only 572 pixels. >=20 >> ;; Number of lines is _larger_ than before: >> (frame-height) >> 40 I can't reproduce the problem. It sounds as Emacs does not get the = resize event from your window manager. Can you try with another window = manager? What are you using now? Jan D. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 30 16:13:22 2012 Received: (at 12733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2012 20:13:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40161 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTIBd-0000ov-RK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:13:22 -0400 Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.134.1]:52195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTIBc-0000oo-0g for 12733@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:13:20 -0400 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q9UKAjBi018256; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:10:45 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q9UKAjDe019327; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:10:45 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9UKAja4019325; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:10:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-ID: <20624.13381.267925.16346@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:10:45 +0100 To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= Subject: Re: bug#12733: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif In-Reply-To: <0D00FAF3-BE3C-4BFD-9481-FE6702CF8F37@swipnet.se> References: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20622.28190.808960.297381@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <0D00FAF3-BE3C-4BFD-9481-FE6702CF8F37@swipnet.se> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 23.4.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de id q9UKAjBi018256 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12733 Cc: 12733@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) >>>>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Jan Dj=E4rv wrote: >>> With Emacs from BZR (revision 110662) linked against the Motif toolki= t >>> (version 2.3.4), I observe that after disabling the menu bar, the >>> frame doesn't have the correct height. The result is that the modelin= e >>> and the minibuffer are no longer visible. >>> (menu-bar-mode -1) >>> nil >>> ;; At this point, the X window shrinks by the height of the menu bar. >>> ;; However, the bottom of the frame contents (containing modeline and >>> ;; minibuffer) are no longer visible. > Do they appear if you resize the frame a bit? Yes, they do appear. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 30 17:11:12 2012 Received: (at 12733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2012 21:11:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40208 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTJ5c-0002Ly-6N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:11:12 -0400 Received: from mailout.melmac.se ([62.20.26.67]:53314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTJ5Z-0002Lq-QV for 12733@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:11:10 -0400 Received: from mail01.melmac.se (mail01.melmac.se [62.20.26.80]) by mailout.melmac.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2F09A07 for <12733@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:08:35 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 7590 invoked by uid 89); 30 Oct 2012 21:08:35 -0000 Received: from h-46-59-42-18.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.18) by mail01.melmac.se with ESMTPA; 30 Oct 2012 21:08:35 -0000 Received: from [172.20.199.13] (zeplin [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0C317FA05E; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:08:35 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: bug#12733: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= In-Reply-To: <20624.13381.267925.16346@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:08:35 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <16C299CC-895B-42C7-93FD-483C63DFC74D@swipnet.se> References: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20622.28190.808960.297381@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <0D00FAF3-BE3C-4BFD-9481-FE6702CF8F37@swipnet.se> <20624.13381.267925.16346@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> To: Ulrich Mueller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello. 30 okt 2012 kl. 21:10 skrev Ulrich Mueller : >>>>>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Jan Djärv wrote: > >>>> With Emacs from BZR (revision 110662) linked against the Motif toolkit >>>> (version 2.3.4), I observe that after disabling the menu bar, the >>>> frame doesn't have the correct height. The result is that the modeline >>>> and the minibuffer are no longer visible. > >>>> (menu-bar-mode -1) >>>> nil >>>> ;; At this point, the X window shrinks by the height of the menu bar. >>>> ;; However, the bottom of the frame contents (containing modeline and >>>> ;; minibuffer) are no longer visible. > >> Do they appear if you resize the frame a bit? > > Yes, they do appear. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12733 Cc: 12733@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello. 30 okt 2012 kl. 21:10 skrev Ulrich Mueller : >>>>>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Jan Djärv wrote: > >>>> With Emacs from BZR (revision 110662) linked against the Motif toolkit >>>> (version 2.3.4), I observe that after disabling the menu bar, the >>>> frame doesn't have the correct height. The result is that the modeline >>>> and the minibuffer are no longer visible. > >>>> (menu-bar-mode -1) >>>> nil >>>> ;; At this point, the X window shrinks by the height of the menu bar. >>>> ;; However, the bottom of the frame contents (containing modeline and >>>> ;; minibuffer) are no longer visible. > >> Do they appear if you resize the frame a bit? > > Yes, they do appear. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] Hello. 30 okt 2012 kl. 21:10 skrev Ulrich Mueller : >>>>>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Jan Dj=E4rv wrote: >=20 >>>> With Emacs from BZR (revision 110662) linked against the Motif = toolkit >>>> (version 2.3.4), I observe that after disabling the menu bar, the >>>> frame doesn't have the correct height. The result is that the = modeline >>>> and the minibuffer are no longer visible. >=20 >>>> (menu-bar-mode -1) >>>> nil >>>> ;; At this point, the X window shrinks by the height of the menu = bar. >>>> ;; However, the bottom of the frame contents (containing modeline = and >>>> ;; minibuffer) are no longer visible. >=20 >> Do they appear if you resize the frame a bit? >=20 > Yes, they do appear. So the size calculation is sound, Emacs is either not getting resize = events or does not understand them. This is usually window manager = related. Jan D. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 31 06:29:31 2012 Received: (at 12733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2012 10:29:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40840 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTVYB-0005BE-7Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 06:29:31 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:41708) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTVY8-0005B6-38 for 12733@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 06:29:29 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2012 10:26:50 -0000 Received: from 62-47-46-176.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.46.176]) [62.47.46.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 31 Oct 2012 11:26:50 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+EMX4cUdGElXpAinvpHL9spj7wNjOIrBnxXpKocC mWhe20FcfBfndI Message-ID: <5090FCE5.3020803@gmx.at> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:26:45 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Subject: Re: bug#12733: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif References: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20622.28190.808960.297381@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <0D00FAF3-BE3C-4BFD-9481-FE6702CF8F37@swipnet.se> <20624.13381.267925.16346@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <16C299CC-895B-42C7-93FD-483C63DFC74D@swipnet.se> In-Reply-To: <16C299CC-895B-42C7-93FD-483C63DFC74D@swipnet.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12733 Cc: 12733@debbugs.gnu.org, Ulrich Mueller X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) > So the size calculation is sound, Emacs is either not getting resize > events or does not understand them. This is usually window manager > related. Are you sure that we don't miss calling the display engine here after updating the frame parameters? martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 01 03:24:58 2012 Received: (at 12733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2012 07:24:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42423 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTp98-0002XO-8L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 03:24:58 -0400 Received: from mailout.melmac.se ([62.20.26.67]:59659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTp95-0002XE-DN for 12733@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 03:24:57 -0400 Received: from mail01.melmac.se (mail01.melmac.se [62.20.26.80]) by mailout.melmac.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDC3C9F5 for <12733@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:22:10 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 23693 invoked by uid 89); 1 Nov 2012 07:22:10 -0000 Received: from h-46-59-42-18.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.18) by mail01.melmac.se with ESMTPA; 1 Nov 2012 07:22:10 -0000 Received: from [172.20.199.13] (zeplin [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E5787FA05E; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:22:10 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: bug#12733: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= In-Reply-To: <5090FCE5.3020803@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:22:13 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20622.28190.808960.297381@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <0D00FAF3-BE3C-4BFD-9481-FE6702CF8F37@swipnet.se> <20624.13381.267925.16346@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <16C299CC-895B-42C7-93FD-483C63DFC74D@swipnet.se> <5090FCE5.3020803@gmx.at> To: martin rudalics X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello. 31 okt 2012 kl. 11:26 skrev martin rudalics : > > So the size calculation is sound, Emacs is either not getting resize > > events or does not understand them. This is usually window manager > > related. > > Are you sure that we don't miss calling the display engine here after > updating the frame parameters? [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12733 Cc: 12733@debbugs.gnu.org, Ulrich Mueller X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello. 31 okt 2012 kl. 11:26 skrev martin rudalics : > > So the size calculation is sound, Emacs is either not getting resize > > events or does not understand them. This is usually window manager > > related. > > Are you sure that we don't miss calling the display engine here after > updating the frame parameters? [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] Hello. 31 okt 2012 kl. 11:26 skrev martin rudalics : > > So the size calculation is sound, Emacs is either not getting resize > > events or does not understand them. This is usually window manager > > related. >=20 > Are you sure that we don't miss calling the display engine here after > updating the frame parameters? There is no calling the display engine in this case, there is just = setting the frame garbaged and adjusting the frame size. Given the fact that I can't reproduce it suggests it is working for some = cases at least. But the exact environment of the reporter is not known, = we don't know which window manager he uses. So we probably can't = reproduce this util we know that. Jan D. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 01 05:15:09 2012 Received: (at 12733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2012 09:15:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42550 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTqrk-00051e-JG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 05:15:09 -0400 Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.134.1]:34117) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTqri-00051X-Hz for 12733@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 05:15:07 -0400 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id qA19CMRb013717; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 10:12:22 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qA19CMEV013660; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 10:12:22 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA19CL2t013656; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 10:12:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-ID: <20626.15605.788110.196948@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 10:12:21 +0100 To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= Subject: Re: bug#12733: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif In-Reply-To: References: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20622.28190.808960.297381@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <0D00FAF3-BE3C-4BFD-9481-FE6702CF8F37@swipnet.se> <20624.13381.267925.16346@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <16C299CC-895B-42C7-93FD-483C63DFC74D@swipnet.se> <5090FCE5.3020803@gmx.at> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 23.4.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de id qA19CMRb013717 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12733 Cc: martin rudalics , 12733@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) >>>>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Dj=E4rv wrote: > There is no calling the display engine in this case, there is just > setting the frame garbaged and adjusting the frame size. > Given the fact that I can't reproduce it suggests it is working for > some cases at least. But the exact environment of the reporter is > not known, we don't know which window manager he uses. So we > probably can't reproduce this util we know that. Window manager here is xfwm4 version 4.10.0. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 01 09:53:26 2012 Received: (at 12733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2012 13:53:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42793 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTvD3-0003dh-TG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:53:26 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:60044) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTvD1-0003dZ-Uj for 12733@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:53:25 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MCT00900A57IK00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 12733@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:50:18 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MCT00970AFI1S80@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:50:07 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:50:25 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12733: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif In-reply-to: To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= Message-id: <83bofh77q6.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il References: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20622.28190.808960.297381@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <0D00FAF3-BE3C-4BFD-9481-FE6702CF8F37@swipnet.se> <20624.13381.267925.16346@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <16C299CC-895B-42C7-93FD-483C63DFC74D@swipnet.se> <5090FCE5.3020803@gmx.at> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Jan Djärv > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:22:13 +0100 > Cc: 12733@debbugs.gnu.org, Ulrich Mueller > > > Are you sure that we don't miss calling the display engine here after > > updating the frame parameters? > > There is no calling the display engine in this case, there is just setting the frame garbaged and adjusting the frame size. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12733 Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, ulm@gentoo.org, 12733@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Jan Djärv > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:22:13 +0100 > Cc: 12733@debbugs.gnu.org, Ulrich Mueller > > > Are you sure that we don't miss calling the display engine here after > > updating the frame parameters? > > There is no calling the display engine in this case, there is just setting the frame garbaged and adjusting the frame size. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4560] > From: Jan Dj=E4rv > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:22:13 +0100 > Cc: 12733@debbugs.gnu.org, Ulrich Mueller >=20 > > Are you sure that we don't miss calling the display engine here a= fter > > updating the frame parameters? >=20 > There is no calling the display engine in this case, there is just = setting the frame garbaged and adjusting the frame size. Which will cause the display engine reallocate the glyph matrices and redraw everything at the next redisplay opportunity. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 02 13:28:59 2012 Received: (at 12733-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2012 17:28:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUL3C-0004Oa-W6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:28:59 -0400 Received: from mailout.melmac.se ([62.20.26.67]:47786) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUL3A-0004OL-2s for 12733-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:28:56 -0400 Received: from mail01.melmac.se (mail01.melmac.se [62.20.26.80]) by mailout.melmac.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BC09E2F for <12733-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 18:26:04 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 27712 invoked by uid 89); 2 Nov 2012 17:26:04 -0000 Received: from h-46-59-42-18.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.18) by mail01.melmac.se with ESMTPA; 2 Nov 2012 17:26:04 -0000 Received: from [172.20.199.13] (zeplin [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B2F37FA05E; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 18:26:04 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: bug#12733: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= In-Reply-To: <20626.15605.788110.196948@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 18:26:09 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0FDB8A85-1BD3-4468-AECE-0FE8D97F2587@swipnet.se> References: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20622.28190.808960.297381@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <0D00FAF3-BE3C-4BFD-9481-FE6702CF8F37@swipnet.se> <20624.13381.267925.16346@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <16C299CC-895B-42C7-93FD-483C63DFC74D@swipnet.se> <5090FCE5.3020803@gmx.at> <20626.15605.788110.196948@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> To: Ulrich Mueller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello. 1 nov 2012 kl. 10:12 skrev Ulrich Mueller : >>>>>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Djärv wrote: > >> There is no calling the display engine in this case, there is just >> setting the frame garbaged and adjusting the frame size. > >> Given the fact that I can't reproduce it suggests it is working for >> some cases at least. But the exact environment of the reporter is >> not known, we don't know which window manager he uses. So we >> probably can't reproduce this util we know that. > > Window manager here is xfwm4 version 4.10.0. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12733-done Cc: martin rudalics , 12733-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello. 1 nov 2012 kl. 10:12 skrev Ulrich Mueller : >>>>>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Djärv wrote: > >> There is no calling the display engine in this case, there is just >> setting the frame garbaged and adjusting the frame size. > >> Given the fact that I can't reproduce it suggests it is working for >> some cases at least. But the exact environment of the reporter is >> not known, we don't know which window manager he uses. So we >> probably can't reproduce this util we know that. > > Window manager here is xfwm4 version 4.10.0. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4976] Hello. 1 nov 2012 kl. 10:12 skrev Ulrich Mueller : >>>>>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Dj=E4rv wrote: >=20 >> There is no calling the display engine in this case, there is just >> setting the frame garbaged and adjusting the frame size. >=20 >> Given the fact that I can't reproduce it suggests it is working for >> some cases at least. But the exact environment of the reporter is >> not known, we don't know which window manager he uses. So we >> probably can't reproduce this util we know that. >=20 > Window manager here is xfwm4 version 4.10.0. It is reproducible with that WM. My guess is that Xt filters out the = ConfigureNotify from xfwm4 because of a bad timestamp or serial. I have checked in a fix in the trunk. Jan D. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 02 14:47:31 2012 Received: (at 12733-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2012 18:47:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45981 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUMHD-0006EJ-4M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:47:31 -0400 Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.134.1]:43148) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUMHB-0006EB-Eg for 12733-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:47:30 -0400 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id qA2IicFF027956; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 19:44:38 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qA2IicBW004503; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 19:44:38 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA2IicQ3004494; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 19:44:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-ID: <20628.5264.999800.168470@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 19:44:32 +0100 To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= Subject: Re: bug#12733: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif In-Reply-To: <0FDB8A85-1BD3-4468-AECE-0FE8D97F2587@swipnet.se> References: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20622.28190.808960.297381@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <0D00FAF3-BE3C-4BFD-9481-FE6702CF8F37@swipnet.se> <20624.13381.267925.16346@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <16C299CC-895B-42C7-93FD-483C63DFC74D@swipnet.se> <5090FCE5.3020803@gmx.at> <20626.15605.788110.196948@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <0FDB8A85-1BD3-4468-AECE-0FE8D97F2587@swipnet.se> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 23.4.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de id qA2IicFF027956 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12733-done Cc: martin rudalics , 12733-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) >>>>> On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Jan Dj=E4rv wrote: >> Window manager here is xfwm4 version 4.10.0. > It is reproducible with that WM. My guess is that Xt filters out > the ConfigureNotify from xfwm4 because of a bad timestamp or serial. > I have checked in a fix in the trunk. Thank you. I can confirm that I don't see the problem in the trunk (revno 110771) any more. Since this was a regression from Emacs 23, I wonder if the fix wouldn't qualify for the emacs-24 branch? Ulrich From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 03 07:41:20 2012 Received: (at 12733-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2012 11:41:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46757 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUc6K-0003Fo-Ky for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 07:41:20 -0400 Received: from mailout.melmac.se ([62.20.26.67]:47028) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUc6I-0003Ff-Vu for 12733-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 07:41:20 -0400 Received: from mail01.melmac.se (mail01.melmac.se [62.20.26.80]) by mailout.melmac.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D609188 for <12733-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:38:23 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 12160 invoked by uid 89); 3 Nov 2012 11:38:23 -0000 Received: from h-46-59-42-18.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.18) by mail01.melmac.se with ESMTPA; 3 Nov 2012 11:38:23 -0000 Received: from [172.20.199.13] (zeplin [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 729C17FA05E; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:38:22 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: bug#12733: 24.2.50; Disabling menu bar doesn't resize frame correctly --with-x-toolkit=motif From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= In-Reply-To: <20628.5264.999800.168470@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:38:21 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20617.22453.530059.496403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20622.28190.808960.297381@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <0D00FAF3-BE3C-4BFD-9481-FE6702CF8F37@swipnet.se> <20624.13381.267925.16346@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <16C299CC-895B-42C7-93FD-483C63DFC74D@swipnet.se> <5090FCE5.3020803@gmx.at> <20626.15605.788110.196948@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <0FDB8A85-1BD3-4468-AECE-0FE8D97F2587@swipnet.se> <20628.5264.999800.168470@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> To: Ulrich Mueller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello. 2 nov 2012 kl. 19:44 skrev Ulrich Mueller : >>>>>> On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Jan Djärv wrote: > >>> Window manager here is xfwm4 version 4.10.0. > >> It is reproducible with that WM. My guess is that Xt filters out >> the ConfigureNotify from xfwm4 because of a bad timestamp or serial. > >> I have checked in a fix in the trunk. > > Thank you. I can confirm that I don't see the problem in the trunk > (revno 110771) any more. > > Since this was a regression from Emacs 23, I wonder if the fix > wouldn't qualify for the emacs-24 branch? [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4999] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12733-done Cc: martin rudalics , 12733-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello. 2 nov 2012 kl. 19:44 skrev Ulrich Mueller : >>>>>> On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Jan Djärv wrote: > >>> Window manager here is xfwm4 version 4.10.0. > >> It is reproducible with that WM. My guess is that Xt filters out >> the ConfigureNotify from xfwm4 because of a bad timestamp or serial. > >> I have checked in a fix in the trunk. > > Thank you. I can confirm that I don't see the problem in the trunk > (revno 110771) any more. > > Since this was a regression from Emacs 23, I wonder if the fix > wouldn't qualify for the emacs-24 branch? [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4604] Hello. 2 nov 2012 kl. 19:44 skrev Ulrich Mueller : >>>>>> On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Jan Dj=E4rv wrote: >=20 >>> Window manager here is xfwm4 version 4.10.0. >=20 >> It is reproducible with that WM. My guess is that Xt filters out >> the ConfigureNotify from xfwm4 because of a bad timestamp or serial. >=20 >> I have checked in a fix in the trunk. >=20 > Thank you. I can confirm that I don't see the problem in the trunk > (revno 110771) any more. >=20 > Since this was a regression from Emacs 23, I wonder if the fix > wouldn't qualify for the emacs-24 branch? I put it there. Jan D. From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:28:49 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator