From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 22 15:04:19 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2012 19:04:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56243 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQNIQ-0002xe-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:04:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39313) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQNIN-0002xR-Re for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:04:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQNGW-0008WR-K1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:02:22 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:52610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQNGW-0008WN-HC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:02:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQNGV-0000qj-Ht for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:02:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQNGU-0008W3-DU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:02:19 -0400 Received: from sanddollar.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.167]:14919) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQNGU-0008Vv-8f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:02:18 -0400 Received: (qmail 12481 invoked by uid 1003); 22 Oct 2012 19:02:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.geekisp.com [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.geekisp.com (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:02:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:02:28 +0200 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.2.50; Outdated timestamp documentation in Elisp manual Message-ID: <20121022190228.GA21564@c3po> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: http://www.dr-qubit.org/gpg-toby.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.11 (Ladyburn) From: Toby Cubitt X-Primary-Address: toby@dr-qubit.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Toby Cubitt List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline The documentation in the Elisp manual for `file-attributes' and for file-modification undo-list elements hasn't been updated to match the new high-precision timestamp format. Patch attached. Toby -- Dr T. S. Cubitt Mathematics and Quantum Information group Department of Mathematics Complutense University Madrid, Spain email: tsc25@cantab.net web: www.dr-qubit.org --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="elisp_timestamp_doc.patch" === modified file 'doc/lispref/files.texi' --- doc/lispref/files.texi 2012-10-01 02:07:14 +0000 +++ doc/lispref/files.texi 2012-10-22 18:53:24 +0000 @@ -1220,12 +1220,13 @@ The file's @acronym{GID}, likewise. @item -The time of last access, as a list of two integers. -The first integer has the high-order 16 bits of time, -the second has the low 16 bits. (This is similar to the -value of @code{current-time}; see @ref{Time of Day}.) Note that on -some FAT-based filesystems, only the date of last access is recorded, -so this time will always hold the midnight of the day of last access. +The time of last access, as a list of four integers. The first +integer has the high-order 16 bits of the seconds, the second integer +the low 16 bits, the third the microseconds, and the fourth the +picoseconds. (This is similar to the value of @code{current-time}; +see @ref{Time of Day}.) Note that on some FAT-based filesystems, only +the date of last access is recorded, so this time will always hold the +midnight of the day of last access. @cindex modification time of file @item === modified file 'doc/lispref/text.texi' --- doc/lispref/text.texi 2012-09-18 05:14:42 +0000 +++ doc/lispref/text.texi 2012-10-22 18:49:39 +0000 @@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ positive, point was at the beginning of the deleted text, otherwise it was at the end. -@item (t @var{high} . @var{low}) +@item (t @var{sec-high} @var{sec-low} @var{msec} @var{usec}) This kind of element indicates that an unmodified buffer became modified. The elements @var{high} and @var{low} are two integers, each recording 16 bits of the visited file's modification time as of when it --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 22 16:00:53 2012 Received: (at 12706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2012 20:00:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56266 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQOBB-0004QB-ET for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:00:53 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:38113) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQOB9-0004Pq-F2 for 12706@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:00:52 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MCB00K008RQ2V00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 12706@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:58:56 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MCB00J978U7SU50@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:58:56 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:58:52 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12706: 24.2.50; Outdated timestamp documentation in Elisp manual In-reply-to: <20121022190228.GA21564@c3po> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Toby Cubitt Message-id: <83ehkqcm83.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20121022190228.GA21564@c3po> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:02:28 +0200 > From: Toby Cubitt > > The documentation in the Elisp manual for `file-attributes' and for > file-modification undo-list elements hasn't been updated to match the new > high-precision timestamp format. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12706 Cc: 12706@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:02:28 +0200 > From: Toby Cubitt > > The documentation in the Elisp manual for `file-attributes' and for > file-modification undo-list elements hasn't been updated to match the new > high-precision timestamp format. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:02:28 +0200 > From: Toby Cubitt > > The documentation in the Elisp manual for `file-attributes' and for > file-modification undo-list elements hasn't been updated to match the new > high-precision timestamp format. That's normal at this stage: documentation usually gets updated only late in the release process, which didn't start yet. There are markings in etc/NEWS that tell which changes are not documented yet. > Patch attached. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 22 16:10:20 2012 Received: (at 12706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2012 20:10:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56274 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQOKK-0004kY-ES for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:10:20 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:48324 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQOKI-0004kO-Pw for 12706@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:10:19 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQOIX-0001S6-FS; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:08:29 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12706: 24.2.50; Outdated timestamp documentation in Elisp manual References: <20121022190228.GA21564@c3po> <83ehkqcm83.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: Gazprom Belknap CDMA eavesdropping assassinate Albright X-Ran: [wys[joR2[.?J;4b%!['QS7AZWUE0_G2|I)oAzK"9mQms$oeHG_+\YA-5H/Fe>_D3Y$rhf X-Hue: yellow X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:08:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83ehkqcm83.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:58:52 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12706 Cc: Toby Cubitt , 12706@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> The documentation in the Elisp manual for `file-attributes' and for >> file-modification undo-list elements hasn't been updated to match the new >> high-precision timestamp format. > > That's normal at this stage: documentation usually gets updated only > late in the release process, which didn't start yet. There are > markings in etc/NEWS that tell which changes are not documented yet. The file-attributes entry is marked with "---", so it's good that we have this report. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 22 16:25:52 2012 Received: (at 12706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2012 20:25:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56292 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQOZM-0005C7-CR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:25:52 -0400 Received: from starfish.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.166]:34928) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQOZK-0005Bv-PZ for 12706@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:25:51 -0400 Received: (qmail 2611 invoked by uid 1003); 22 Oct 2012 20:23:56 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.geekisp.com [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.geekisp.com (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:23:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:24:07 +0200 To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#12706: 24.2.50; Outdated timestamp documentation in Elisp manual Message-ID: <20121022202407.GA31923@c3po> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://www.dr-qubit.org/gpg-toby.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.11 (Ladyburn) From: Toby Cubitt X-Primary-Address: toby@dr-qubit.org X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:08:29PM -0400, Glenn Morris wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> The documentation in the Elisp manual for `file-attributes' and for > >> file-modification undo-list elements hasn't been updated to match the new > >> high-precision timestamp format. > > > > That's normal at this stage: documentation usually gets updated only > > late in the release process, which didn't start yet. There are > > markings in etc/NEWS that tell which changes are not documented yet. [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 1.5 FAKE_REPLY_C FAKE_REPLY_C X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12706 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 12706@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:08:29PM -0400, Glenn Morris wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> The documentation in the Elisp manual for `file-attributes' and for > >> file-modification undo-list elements hasn't been updated to match the new > >> high-precision timestamp format. > > > > That's normal at this stage: documentation usually gets updated only > > late in the release process, which didn't start yet. There are > > markings in etc/NEWS that tell which changes are not documented yet. [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 1.5 FAKE_REPLY_C FAKE_REPLY_C On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:08:29PM -0400, Glenn Morris wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> The documentation in the Elisp manual for `file-attributes' and for > >> file-modification undo-list elements hasn't been updated to match the new > >> high-precision timestamp format. > > > > That's normal at this stage: documentation usually gets updated only > > late in the release process, which didn't start yet. There are > > markings in etc/NEWS that tell which changes are not documented yet. Ah, I didn't realise that's how things worked. I'll know for next time. Thanks! > The file-attributes entry is marked with "---", so it's good that we > have this report. Glad it's still useful for something. I suspect the changes to the undo entry format also risked being overlooked too, since they aren't mentioned explicitly in that etc/NEWS entry. Toby -- Dr T. S. Cubitt Mathematics and Quantum Information group Department of Mathematics Complutense University Madrid, Spain email: tsc25@cantab.net web: www.dr-qubit.org From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 22 16:28:20 2012 Received: (at 12706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2012 20:28:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56298 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQObj-0005Fs-S3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:28:20 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:35706) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQObi-0005Fe-45 for 12706@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:28:18 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MCB00J00A2RVI00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 12706@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:25:58 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MCB00J7PA3A2OF0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:25:58 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:25:54 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#12706: 24.2.50; Outdated timestamp documentation in Elisp manual In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Glenn Morris Message-id: <83a9veckz1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20121022190228.GA21564@c3po> <83ehkqcm83.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Toby Cubitt , 12706@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:08:29 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> The documentation in the Elisp manual for `file-attributes' and for > >> file-modification undo-list elements hasn't been updated to match the new > >> high-precision timestamp format. > > > > That's normal at this stage: documentation usually gets updated only > > late in the release process, which didn't start yet. There are > > markings in etc/NEWS that tell which changes are not documented yet. > > The file-attributes entry is marked with "---" [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12706 Cc: toby-dated-1352142136.ff38c0@dr-qubit.org, 12706@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Toby Cubitt , 12706@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:08:29 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> The documentation in the Elisp manual for `file-attributes' and for > >> file-modification undo-list elements hasn't been updated to match the new > >> high-precision timestamp format. > > > > That's normal at this stage: documentation usually gets updated only > > late in the release process, which didn't start yet. There are > > markings in etc/NEWS that tell which changes are not documented yet. > > The file-attributes entry is marked with "---" [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Toby Cubitt , 12706@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:08:29 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> The documentation in the Elisp manual for `file-attributes' and for > >> file-modification undo-list elements hasn't been updated to match the new > >> high-precision timestamp format. > > > > That's normal at this stage: documentation usually gets updated only > > late in the release process, which didn't start yet. There are > > markings in etc/NEWS that tell which changes are not documented yet. > > The file-attributes entry is marked with "---" Then _that_ is a bug. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 23 04:04:11 2012 Received: (at 12706-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2012 08:04:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56908 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQZT8-0000O9-T4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:04:11 -0400 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:42191) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQZT6-0000Nx-E2 for 12706-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:04:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AC4A6000E; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:02:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FfOVvQNJeqFj; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-108-23-119-2.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [108.23.119.2]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F3D5A60009; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50864F05.2040109@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:02:13 -0700 From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Toby Cubitt Subject: 24.2.50; Outdated timestamp documentation in Elisp manual Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12706-done Cc: 12706-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) Thanks for the bug report. I installed a fix for it in trunk bzr 110628, which you can see here: http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/emacs/trunk/revision/110628 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 23 11:59:11 2012 Received: (at 12706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2012 15:59:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQgso-0003dM-N5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:59:11 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:43499 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQgsl-0003dE-Qf for 12706@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:59:08 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TQgqv-0005WX-Ce; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:57:13 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 12706@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#12706: 24.2.50; Outdated timestamp documentation in Elisp manual References: <20121022190228.GA21564@c3po> <50864F05.2040109@cs.ucla.edu> X-Spook: Leitrim fraud Aldergrove New World Order virus dictionary X-Ran: D}|GN"H*,(\%R{4))f<*dIdzYBiL9/0&@?zFSlB)k3qp)X8PK49(I&]fY}YWoyn`;aNA]b X-Hue: cyan X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:57:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <50864F05.2040109@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:02:13 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12706 Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Paul Eggert wrote: > Thanks for the bug report. I installed a fix for it in > trunk bzr 110628, which you can see here: > > http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/emacs/trunk/revision/110628 There's still more to do. You can use @code{file-attributes} to get a file's last modification time as a list of two numbers. @xref{File Attributes}. @cindex modification time of file @item The time of last modification as a list of two integers (as above). @item The time of last status change as a list of two integers (as above). For example, here are the file attributes for @file{files.texi}: [...] @item (19145 42977) was last accessed on Oct 5 2009, at 10:01:37. etc. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 24 01:15:44 2012 Received: (at 12706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2012 05:15:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58538 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQtJf-0000EA-Vq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:15:44 -0400 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:44373) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQtJd-0000Dx-Q4 for 12706@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:15:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2498AA60007; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:13:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PdzSk6oBM5UC; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-108-23-119-2.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [108.23.119.2]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF405A60003; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50877908.9090609@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:13:44 -0700 From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#12706: 24.2.50; Outdated timestamp documentation in Elisp manual References: <20121022190228.GA21564@c3po> <50864F05.2040109@cs.ucla.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12706 Cc: 12706@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) On 10/23/2012 08:57 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > There's still more to do. Thanks, I fixed the documentation problems you mentioned (and a few others that I found after looking again) in trunk bzr 110646. From unknown Tue Jun 24 13:59:08 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator