From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:12:39 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#12694 <12694@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#12694 <12694@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.2.50; `file-cache-add-file(-list)' commands Reply-To: bug#12694 <12694@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:12:39 +0000 retitle 12694 24.2.50; `file-cache-add-file(-list)' commands reassign 12694 emacs submitter 12694 "Drew Adams" severity 12694 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 20 18:46:52 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2012 22:46:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53550 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPhoh-0006RX-DN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:46:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48877) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPhoe-0006RK-FL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:46:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPhmy-0000R5-L9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:45:05 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:58493) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPhmy-0000Qn-IM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:45:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPhmx-0000bl-Il for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:45:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPhmw-0000OA-6x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:45:03 -0400 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]:42928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPhmv-0000Lt-WB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:45:02 -0400 Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q9KMixr7026005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:44:59 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9KMiw3l025183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:44:59 GMT Received: from abhmt112.oracle.com (abhmt112.oracle.com [141.146.116.64]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q9KMiw8R006451 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 17:44:58 -0500 Received: from dradamslap1 (/71.202.147.44) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:44:58 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: Subject: 24.2.50; `file-cache-add-file(-list)' commands Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:44:26 -0700 Message-ID: <5D93535BCDA54EA9BF30475E92222D4C@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Thread-Index: Ac2vFHVrBMKsRSn8TM+K+dWobhr/kQ== X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) 1. These two commands are not documented along with the others, in the Emacs manual. Fair enough, if they are not deemed useful enough. Just mentioning this here in case it was overlooked. 2. Doc string of `file-cache-add-file-list': a. Typo: "files names" -> "file names". b. The doc string should say that the input you provide is read as a Lisp sexp and evaluated to produce a list of (absolute?) file names. Otherwise users of the command will have no idea what to type! IOW, users do not see the `X' `interactive' spec, and the implementation of that spec provides no runtime help to users (AFAIK). 3. A cursory scan of the code suggests that the behavior might not be correct if you input a relative file name to `file-cache-add-file-list'. If you do that, directory of nil is recorded for the file, and I'm guessing that is incorrect (?). If so, then `file-cache-add-file-list' should, for example, expand the name relative to the default directory. If it is not incorrect, then #2 above should mention that your input can be an absolute or a relative file name, and it should explain what the interpretation of a relative file name is. IOW, how does the code use an element of `file-cache-alist' that looks like this: ("foo.el" nil)? Does it interpret the nil at runtime (i.e., during completion) as the default directory? Just what does it do? If a user doesn't know what form the input must take then s?he cannot use the command. To know that means to know something about the _treatment_ of an entry like ("foo.el" nil) (even if it does not imply that that form need be known to users), which form is allowed today (but whose behavior doesn't seem to be described anywhere). 4. `file-cache-add-file': Why does the file need to exist for interactive use? Why not let users add names of files that do not yet exist? In any case we provide a message for such a case. That message is used currently only when NOT interactive, which seems wrong in itself. Code executed non-interactively has little use for messages. (Of course, if the function is called from a command that is itself invoked interactively then showing the message might make sense.) In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2012-10-15 on DANI-PC Bzr revision: 110553 monnier@iro.umontreal.ca-20121015164957-6zms5w2js1xkldtg Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -I../../libs/libxpm-3.5.8/include -I../../libs/libxpm-3.5.8/src -I../../libs/libpng-1.4.10 -I../../libs/zlib-1.2.6 -I../../libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include -I../../libs/jpeg-6b-4/include -I../../libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include -I../../libs/libxml2-2.7.8-w32-bin/include/libxml2 -I../../libs/gnutls-3.0.16/include -I../../libs/libiconv-1.14-2-mingw32-dev/include' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 17 01:23:58 2012 Received: (at 12694) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2012 06:23:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50008 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZbor-0000Ti-U4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:23:58 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:40827) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZbop-0000TY-P5 for 12694@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:23:56 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id uo1so2312933pbc.3 for <12694@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:23:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=e7yu02wJLZ5QIY2vFrKNcEeT+j6mS6amiNpLNZt/nq0=; b=JXWuiYPvkW43cdYD4HRmZV62xu34wMC9gKU35s22qXknLueI/dwArino5fyidfmuYx J+t4r1odbs3QXY9SbENO35H0n7pboaIMyqsDqJxeSiQHws9/TCrsylRWUV7BjKavqDl7 I0zzYleG1gKs7TavxWIYRBVW2LRYgEBm+mwc5It+mIzkTwBzjm8X47lAwp0G9FbDYkTL y4x94ts+QbdWj2tV2v0MjjhfSy5cqU6zR6vyHJOvfoIWO5ktQzRge9AvNEzyXTTWpbq9 fyNhX25glsZ5GOfLK6Qt2WB1iycYE3wwlIOg+8G/wdbSEEaCzcyLtRKnYTlrAqPTDiXa eN/w== Received: by 10.68.252.40 with SMTP id zp8mr22106020pbc.66.1353133383234; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:23:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ulysses (cm198.gamma83.maxonline.com.sg. [202.156.83.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pv8sm2445190pbc.26.2012.11.16.22.23.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:23:01 -0800 (PST) From: Chong Yidong To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#12694: 24.2.50; `file-cache-add-file(-list)' commands References: <5D93535BCDA54EA9BF30475E92222D4C@us.oracle.com> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:22:57 +0800 In-Reply-To: <5D93535BCDA54EA9BF30475E92222D4C@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:44:26 -0700") Message-ID: <878va07npa.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12694 Cc: 12694@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) "Drew Adams" writes: > 2. Doc string of `file-cache-add-file-list': > > a. Typo: "files names" -> "file names". > > b. The doc string should say that the input you provide is read as a > Lisp sexp and evaluated to produce a list of (absolute?) file names. Fixed in the branch, thanks. > 3. A cursory scan of the code suggests that the behavior might not be > correct if you input a relative file name to `file-cache-add-file-list'. Fixed in trunk. > 4. `file-cache-add-file': Why does the file need to exist for > interactive use? I believe that's somewhat inherent in the design of filecache.el. The package assumes that the cached file names have unique non-directory parts. If `file-cache-add-file' lets you enter a non-existent file name, and that inadvertently has the same non-directory part as an existing cache entry, the result would be to wipe out the cache entry for the existing file in favor of a non-existent entry, which would be annoying. That said, I don't personally use filecache.el; this is only from my reading of the code. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 17 01:24:08 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2012 06:24:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50012 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZbp2-0000UO-BV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:24:08 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:40827) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZbp0-0000TY-9G for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:24:06 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id uo1so2312933pbc.3 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:23:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=etpaxJ/l9hOiVbYY1qxBlzQSbMTCUtMlvor1lDom/9Q=; b=zwDh7xVqZS036Dg7LCdpIOqHpikVDNoUhwtDtFG24ESz8AuZNq1pmKDjW+Y2fUzb4N 632nZLCBLEF56z/JrH93lnP2Ur+0+rNbDhBLiXNTZb9qohvAHdfrOUynha21XsFzHDlY RW1smHfcybIlXxPEl9HLSScSmE4GvF+4+eV3p48E7uS2UrFdVMQRD4GIeoVgUWYAtRrn Sile78g+nBgHxJctJ9idh7LJbsogbIWzVTucQkXbAj9jNd9DAWTCvaKlijswLy8mT5Ql znVorUwCdpTZNZ3rAI7+B4QSVoduoWnG3tKEIGu/Ope2AhjyE89tC+qCGN2LlIrLpcK/ Wzog== Received: by 10.69.0.40 with SMTP id av8mr16109017pbd.117.1353133395397; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:23:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ulysses (cm198.gamma83.maxonline.com.sg. [202.156.83.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hc4sm2444760pbc.30.2012.11.16.22.23.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:23:14 -0800 (PST) From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close 12694 Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:23:10 +0800 Message-ID: <87haoou4s1.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) close 12694 thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 17 01:48:33 2012 Received: (at 12694) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2012 06:48:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50052 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZcCc-0002pC-D1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:48:31 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:44267) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZcCZ-0002p5-QW for 12694@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:48:29 -0500 Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qAH6lXS2023898 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 17 Nov 2012 06:47:35 GMT Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAH6lXMa004403 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 17 Nov 2012 06:47:33 GMT Received: from abhmt115.oracle.com (abhmt115.oracle.com [141.146.116.67]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qAH6lV02026492; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 00:47:31 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.229.77) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:47:31 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Chong Yidong'" References: <5D93535BCDA54EA9BF30475E92222D4C@us.oracle.com> <878va07npa.fsf@gnu.org> Subject: RE: bug#12694: 24.2.50; `file-cache-add-file(-list)' commands Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:47:26 -0800 Message-ID: <1F4DC9A9489C4EF49088BCDA11F2E033@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <878va07npa.fsf@gnu.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Thread-Index: Ac3EjAC1MtByQU0MQoOGPY7h/xsvYAAA0nJA X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12694 Cc: 12694@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) > > 4. `file-cache-add-file': Why does the file need to exist for > > interactive use? > > I believe that's somewhat inherent in the design of filecache.el. The > package assumes that the cached file names have unique non-directory > parts. If `file-cache-add-file' lets you enter a non-existent file > name, and that inadvertently has the same non-directory part as an > existing cache entry, the result would be to wipe out the cache entry > for the existing file in favor of a non-existent entry, which would be > annoying. That said, I don't personally use filecache.el; > this is only from my reading of the code. Thanks. But what about the call to `message' for non-interactive use? That's pretty uncommon. What's the rationale for that here? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 17 01:51:58 2012 Received: (at 12694) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2012 06:51:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50074 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZcFx-0002ux-OY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:51:58 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:60996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZcFw-0002up-HY for 12694@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:51:57 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id hz11so434454pad.3 for <12694@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:51:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=aquQdmC2mkQ0Css3s/4MkVz+XPfgCnH6bO0KpsN5a+U=; b=byxQB0SdzuOIDADbByyYfY+jKeErY5s2Lxffq5vHj3FNuJ+Bzs0Zc4gVccVRxFe3mf 167nz7K2dJMUaiwFg3jtzPHHTlyrCmVItsJ/P7FpmduH7BR8oHzhkO4eFwZPnYE0fpxE TUBGJzIIgPdfqjkmNX5rYKoU8ztxC+yISFZA9LpLwVIkU6gQ5JjrcjSzaOkgnXSsaDmc j6OjysSUsn6PkUG8ysJX33yAbDkdFjrKS1qdERgc+Sd6hcSITS8iEvSsqPIyho9Fwe5K 5dq7pmUxrkOHP9czDSh1yui5A3iUVy67OAT+STZsGLCjtsJA40aNQhaRmJsuc/nGIUBs ehiw== Received: by 10.68.230.10 with SMTP id su10mr15967077pbc.47.1353135064992; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:51:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ulysses (cm198.gamma83.maxonline.com.sg. [202.156.83.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vs3sm2474910pbc.61.2012.11.16.22.51.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:51:03 -0800 (PST) From: Chong Yidong To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#12694: 24.2.50; `file-cache-add-file(-list)' commands References: <5D93535BCDA54EA9BF30475E92222D4C@us.oracle.com> <878va07npa.fsf@gnu.org> <1F4DC9A9489C4EF49088BCDA11F2E033@us.oracle.com> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:51:00 +0800 In-Reply-To: <1F4DC9A9489C4EF49088BCDA11F2E033@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:47:26 -0800") Message-ID: <87ip94zprf.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12694 Cc: 12694@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) "Drew Adams" writes: > Thanks. But what about the call to `message' for non-interactive use? > That's pretty uncommon. What's the rationale for that here? I've converted it into an error. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 17 01:53:51 2012 Received: (at 12694) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2012 06:53:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZcHm-0002y7-7J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:53:51 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:47925) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZcHi-0002xx-Ti for 12694@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:53:48 -0500 Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qAH6qsIT032401 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 17 Nov 2012 06:52:55 GMT Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAH6qruZ008005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 17 Nov 2012 06:52:54 GMT Received: from abhmt114.oracle.com (abhmt114.oracle.com [141.146.116.66]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qAH6qrXE028614; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 00:52:53 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.229.77) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:52:53 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Chong Yidong'" References: <5D93535BCDA54EA9BF30475E92222D4C@us.oracle.com><878va07npa.fsf@gnu.org><1F4DC9A9489C4EF49088BCDA11F2E033@us.oracle.com> <87ip94zprf.fsf@gnu.org> Subject: RE: bug#12694: 24.2.50; `file-cache-add-file(-list)' commands Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:52:47 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <87ip94zprf.fsf@gnu.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Thread-Index: Ac3Ej+vbrxidou/OQCOhbsKY1crUpwAADATg X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12694 Cc: 12694@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) > > Thanks. But what about the call to `message' for > > non-interactive use? That's pretty uncommon. What's > > the rationale for that here? > > I've converted it into an error. Thanks. From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:12:39 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator