GNU bug report logs - #12675
find RFE test verb "-inodes"

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Linda Walsh <coreutils <at> tlinx.org>

Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:43:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Linda Walsh <coreutils <at> tlinx.org>
Subject: bug#12675: closed (Re: bug#12675: find RFE test verb "-inodes")
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:25:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#12675: find RFE test verb "-inodes"

which was filed against the coreutils package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 12675 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
12675: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12675
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: Linda Walsh <coreutils <at> tlinx.org>
Cc: 12675-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#12675: find RFE test verb "-inodes"
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:23:03 -0600
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
tag 12675 notabug
thanks

On 10/18/2012 10:41 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> A useful thing to be a test on the number of non-structural entries in a
> directory.
> 
> By non structural, it would work like ls -A, and not include entries
> that are
> part of the directory structure like "." and ".." -- with the idea of being
> able to quickly determine if a directory is empty.

So which do you really want - to know how many directory entries exist,
or to just know if a directory is (non-)empty?  The former would be a
new feature, while the latter already exists as a GNU find extension.

> 
> Maybe 'inodes' with standard +/- adjectives
> 
> So "find . -type d -inodes 0" would find all the empty dirs.
> 
> Unless, of course this is already in there and I've missed it... but
> didn't see anything that would provide this w/o calling an external func
> on each dir...which really slows things down...

Sorry, but you've reached the wrong list.  GNU coreutils does not
maintain find(1); for that, you'd need to write to the findutils list.
But while you are correct that POSIX does not provide this capability,
GNU find already does what you want:

find -type d -empty

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake <at> redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Linda Walsh <coreutils <at> tlinx.org>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: find RFE test verb "-inodes"
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:41:17 -0700


A useful thing to be a test on the number of non-structural entries in a 
directory.

By non structural, it would work like ls -A, and not include entries 
that are
part of the directory structure like "." and ".." -- with the idea of being
able to quickly determine if a directory is empty.

Maybe 'inodes' with standard +/- adjectives

So "find . -type d -inodes 0" would find all the empty dirs.

Unless, of course this is already in there and I've missed it... but
didn't see anything that would provide this w/o calling an external func
on each dir...which really slows things down...






This bug report was last modified 12 years and 277 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.