From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 16 16:26:43 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2012 20:26:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47177 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TODit-0002Hf-7u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:26:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50356) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TODir-0002HU-HD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:26:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TODhZ-0007ie-3l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:25:21 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:40877) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TODhZ-0007iY-0g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:25:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TODhY-0007Op-59 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:25:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TODhX-0007i2-9D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:25:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:52563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TODhX-0007hu-2w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:25:19 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fa10so6974363pad.0 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:25:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=dpv/cWsAaR81sxDHhACHghrQa0kJENBiUD/gvHU5CvM=; b=EC70p5d+TdMirDEpmifTRyEvpl5HZkI12hJSfLVDOIvh6zXXdDD2QEyOchM2kOhXRz 3QgV+PodaUAwL2bY7g/WKEVhidJtq4kAzaWQtfJ8uRiuiPo+glPvEfVu/nacWK57lncQ qxR3cX5Y5fVBXkdXemn92o4h3NCZkuNmJNeOvuHr8i7FNy3aT998c/YQc7rv5hhn7SXi odQ6wK/M5CnuiWNF6QsSivd+SyzfDJzA19spib720QscJvnD7wGAMV/XDL6Y9mrXfIQ9 YUR7PMP0isRpqMt4fy04spckNRj4KzEsC9atp66LA67IThLfvGeXjCjHswlYGnHQGRPy /yzA== Received: by 10.68.234.36 with SMTP id ub4mr50342422pbc.68.1350419117961; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian-6.05 ([115.184.83.76]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7sm11329598pav.26.2012.10.16.13.25.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:25:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Jambunathan K To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.2.50; Completion not showing all candidates Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:56:56 +0530 Message-ID: <871ugyuprj.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) 0. Emacs from bzr. revno: 11057 1. emacs -Q 2. M-: (add-to-list 'load-path "~/src/org-mode/contrib/lisp") 3. M-x load-library RET org-e-odt RET For this to work, copy org-export.el and org-e-odt.el locally. 4. M-x o-e-o TAB TAB ,---- M-x o-e-o TAB TAB | | org-e-o => org-e-odt- | `---- ,---- M-x o-e-o TAB TAB TAB | Click on a completion to select it. | In this buffer, type RET to select the completion near point. | | Possible completions are: | org-e-odt-convert org-e-odt-export-as-odf | org-e-odt-export-as-odf-and-open org-e-odt-export-to-odt `---- 5. M-x o-e-o-l TAB ,---- M-x o-e-o-l TAB | | org-end-of-li | `---- I am wondering why `org-end-of-line' is getting missed in step 4? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 16 17:48:36 2012 Received: (at 12660) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2012 21:48:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47331 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TOF08-0004CA-6i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:48:36 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:16961) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TOF06-0004Bx-VI; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:48:35 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0FAG6Zu09MCoeh/2dsb2JhbABEsEiDSYEIghUBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHAW6CZBEA6MzgViDBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="201833798" Received: from 76-10-135-161.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.135.161]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 16 Oct 2012 17:47:14 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5A15F59520; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:47:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: bug#12660: 24.2.50; Completion not showing all candidates Message-ID: References: <871ugyuprj.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:47:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871ugyuprj.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:56:56 +0530") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 12660 Cc: 12660@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) tags 12660 notabug thanks > 4. M-x o-e-o TAB TAB > ,---- M-x o-e-o TAB TAB > | > | org-e-o => org-e-odt- > | > `---- If you hit ? before each of the TABs you'll understand better. On the second TAB the `partial-completion' style is not involved because simple prefix matching gives you an answer. If you don't like that, then just remove `basic' from your completion-styles. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 20 22:02:01 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2012 02:02:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPkrY-0002QR-Mx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:02:01 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:46158 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPkrX-0002QJ-2k for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:01:59 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPkpw-0002sR-KV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:00:20 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:00:20 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 12660 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) close 12660 From unknown Sun Aug 17 04:17:54 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator