GNU bug report logs - #12648
24.2.50; display-buffer switches to another frame

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 12648 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#12648: 24.2.50; display-buffer switches to another frame
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:52:44 +0200

>>  >  M-: (display-buffer "foo" nil 'visible) RET
[...]
>>  > But
>>  > display-buffer is not supposed to select the window where it displays
>>  > the buffer.
>>
>> Unless it appears on another frame.
>
> Isn't that difference confusing?

I think so.

>> If with emacs -Q you do
>>
>> (let ((pop-up-frames t))
>>    (display-buffer (get-buffer-create "baz")))
>>
>> that buffer is shown on a new frame and its window is selected.
>
> I think this is different: setting pop-up-frames non-nil expresses a
> wish to see certain behavior that the default shouldn't have.

Well, if you call `display-buffer' with the FRAME argument 'visible
you're explicitly asking for such behavior.

>> Maybe we should provide an alist entry like select-frame for this.  If
>> the buffer already appears in another frame, we would select the frame
>> only if the entry is set.  If a new frame is created, we could try to
>> not select it if the entry is not set and the window manager supports
>> creating a frame and not selecting it.
>
> Yes, but is the current behavior useful as it is?

We have a choice between Scylla and Charybdis.  People complained that
making a new frame select the window and reusing an existing frame not
select the window would break their typing habits ...

> If gud.el should call display-buffer in some different way to avoid
> selecting the frame with the source, that, too, could be a good
> solution.

IIUC that's what Chong's `inhibit-switch-frame' alist entry is meant
for.  I haven't tried it yet, though.

martin

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.