GNU bug report logs - #1264
"obsolete" are too early in load-path

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> ics.uci.edu>

Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:45:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System)
To: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
Subject: bug#1264: marked as done ("obsolete" are too early in load-path)
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:00:19 -0400
with message-id <87bpx19ad8.fsf <at> cyd.mit.edu>
and subject line Re: "obsolete" are too early in load-path
has caused the Emacs bug report #1264,
regarding "obsolete" are too early in load-path
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don <at> donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
1264: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=1264
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> ics.uci.edu>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: "obsolete" are too early in load-path
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
"obsolete" should be just about at the end of the list, it's not exactly
where popular files reside...




[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> ics.uci.edu>
Cc: 1264-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: "obsolete" are too early in load-path
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:00:19 -0400
Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> ics.uci.edu> writes:

> Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com> writes:
>
>   > > "obsolete" should be just about at the end of the list, it's not
>   > > exactly where popular files reside...
>   > 
>   > startup.el sets the load patch in reverse alphabetical order.  Does it
>   > matter in practice?
>
> For each file loaded there might be 6 extra stat system calls.

OK, I changed update-subdirs to put the obsolete/ directory last.


This bug report was last modified 16 years and 301 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.